Thursday, March 01, 2007

Taliban official says bin Laden is alive - Focus on Afghanistan - MSNBC.com

Taliban official says bin Laden is alive - Focus on Afghanistan - MSNBC.com

Taliban official says bin Laden is alive

‘He’s not yet martyred,’ says senior commander; NATO expect offensive

The Associated Press
Updated: 11:51 a.m. ET March 1, 2007
LONDON - A senior Taliban commander says Osama bin Laden is alive and in contact with leaders of Afghanistan’s Taliban insurgents, according to an interview aired on British television.

Mullah Dadullah said he had not met bin Laden since the fall of the Taliban regime after the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, but said “we know he’s still alive.”

“He’s not yet martyred. Such information would be easy to get — his comrades stand shoulder to shoulder with us. They keep us informed,” Dadullah said in an interview broadcast Wednesday by Channel 4 News.

The authenticity of the information could not be confirmed. Channel 4 did not say how it had obtained the footage, and it was not known when or where Dadullah made the comments, which were translated into English.

Dadullah, commander of Taliban operations in eastern and southeastern Afghanistan and a trusted associate of Taliban leader Mullah Omar, said bin Laden met outsiders rarely. Dadullah did not comment on bin Laden’s whereabouts.

“Only his comrades see him; we exchange messages with each other to share plans,” Dadullah said. “We also go to the battlefield together. We actually meet very rarely, just for important consultations. It’s hard for anyone to meet bin Laden himself now, but we know he’s still alive.”

Dadullah said the Taliban had “hundreds more” suicide bombers ready to attack NATO forces in Afghanistan.

NATO commanders have said they believe the Taliban plans a spring offensive against alliance troops in the country.

© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10624157/from/RS.1/

Silicon 'found in contaminated fuel tanks'

telegraph
The petrol contamination scare which has caused hundreds of cars in the South East to break down may be caused by silicon, it emerged today.

It is understood that the element - which should not be in petrol - has been detected in the fuel tanks of some of the affected vehicles. This may explain why they have been juddering and misfiring.

Testing agencies have not yet revealed in how many cars silicon has been found, or in what amounts. It is just one possible explanation for the contamination, the AA told Telegraph.co.uk.

Silicon has many industrial uses. In its basic form it is used in semi-conductors, and its compounds including silica are used to form glasses, cements, ceramics and lubricants.

Given the spread of petrol stations affected by the contaminated fuel, silicon would have to have entered the petrol at some point in the supply chain.

Motorists were today told to consider replacing the petrol in their tanks, even if they are unaffected by the contaminated fuel scare.

Ray Holloway, the director of the Peter Retailers’ Association, said drivers should think about getting fresh fuel even if their vehicle is not suffering any problems.

Trading standards officials are investigating complaints from hundreds of drivers who claim they have been sold contaminated fuel.

Many complain that their cars have juddered, misfired and suffered loss of power in the last week. Most complaints come from the south east of England.

Petrol retailers say they are baffled by the complaints. Levels of ethanol, the chemical added to petrol to make it less environmentally harmful, have been normal.

"Motorists who have not been affected could save themselves a bill by changing the petrol in their tanks. That would be my recommendation," Mr Holloway said.

The spotlight is on oxygen sensors in car exhausts that have failed in some vehicles, probably as a result of faulty petrol. As a result, engine management systems cut power to prevent further damage to the engine, allowing drivers to only "limp home".

Manufacturers are working flat out to provide replacement parts after garages ran out of stock as they struggle to cope with demand.

Many of the drivers who have complained said they bought petrol from Tesco and Morrisons. Both supermarkets said they had tested their stocks of unleaded fuel and not found any contamination or abnormalities.

Independent oil company Greenergy - which is part owned by Tesco - has tested fuel supplied to the supermarkets to see if it was faulty. A spokesman said "extensive" tests showed that it met industry standards.

The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders advised motorists to keep all their fuel receipts. If their vehicle is affected, they should contact their car dealer for advice.

The Association of British Insurers (ABI) said motorists affected by contaminated petrol may be able to claim for accidental damage if they have comprehensive cover. A spokesman urged all motorists to keep any evidence that they have purchased the allegedly contaminated petrol, such as receipts or other paperwork.

He said: "At the moment, it is still not clear where liability for this problem lies.

"Nevertheless, the insurance industry can provide this important reassurance to customers in the meantime that, provided they have comprehensive insurance, they need not lose out."

Adam Cracknell, of the RAC, warned drivers not to attempt siphoning petrol from their tanks. He said many modern engines hold the fuel under pressure and removing it should only be done by a mechanic.

"If you have a bucket full of contaminated fuel and it causes a fire then you may be in breach of your insurance and lose your house as well as your car," he said.

Tesco said the problems all appear to be linked to forecourts in the south east of the country served by a refinery in Essex. Asda, which does not get petrol from Greenergy, said it has received about 80 complaints from customers. A spokeswoman said checks have shown no problems with fuel on sale.

War-Weary Dems Face Heat From Left and Right

(CNSNews.com) - Don't go wobbly on us, liberal activists are telling "nervous" Democrats in Congress, as those Democrats mull the best way to stop what many of them describe as President Bush's war.

"Congress has the power to stop the war, but some representatives are afraid to use it," MoveOn.org said in a message to its supporters. "As the [Democratic] caucus meets and debates, we need to remind them that stopping the escalation and ending the war is what they were elected to do."

The only sure way for Congress to stop the war is to cut off funding for it, an idea that many lawmakers don't like because it would put them in the position of failing to support the troops.

Liberal activists say "politics" is clouding the issue for some Democrats who want to cast the war as "Bush's problem."

MoveOn.org called it a "failure of leadership" for Democrats to refuse to take steps that would block the troop surge and begin to end the war. "The truth is, Democrats will be responsible for the war only if they do nothing to stop it," the group said.

MoveOn.org is trying to mobilize public support for measures aimed at stopping the "escalation" in Iraq. "Some Democrats are pushing to water down those measures -- essentially letting the president off the hook," the group said.

"Voters elected Democrats in November to end the war. Right now, it's clear that they're not doing enough. There are no compromises on stopping the escalation."

'Slow bleed'

House Democrats are said to be divided on the best way to force a change in President Bush's war strategy.

As Cybercast News Service reported earlier, anti-war Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) wants to "limit the options of the president" by requiring troops to spend a year at home before returning to battle. He also wants to set training and equipment requirements for troops and prevent combat tours from being extended.

"Now, if they can't extend people, if they can't send people back that don't have equipment and so forth, they can't continue the surge," Murtha was quoted as saying in mid-February.

Several weeks ago, House Democrats did pass a nonbinding resolution opposing the troop buildup. But since then, they've been unable to agree on binding measures.

On Wednesday, House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) said House Democrats should stop "undermining our troops" and stop trying to "micro-manage" the global war on terror.

"Congress has a responsibility to provide America's troops with the resources and flexibility necessary to complete their mission. Our focus must be on supporting our troops in harm's way -- without strings attached -- not on using a military spending bill as an excuse to fund pork-barrel projects and other unrelated projects."

Boehner said Republicans will fight efforts by Democrats to attach conditions to the military spending bill that would make it more difficult for U.S. troops to successfully complete their mission and return home safely.

"In the seven weeks following the announcement of a new strategy for victory in Iraq, Democrats have failed to articulate a coherent vision for either victory or withdrawal; they've offered only a 'slow bleed' strategy that would slowly choke off the funding and reinforcements our troops need to successfully complete their mission," Boehner said.

"Placing arbitrary and punitive political hurdles before any commander-in-chief during a time of war -- especially under the guise of supporting our troops -- is wrong, and it is reckless," Boehner added.

McCain To Letterman: "I Will Be A Candidate For President"

all headline news
New York, NY (AHN) - Arizona Sen. John McCain announced Wednesday that he will seek the Republican nomination for president in 2008.

Given that McCain's candidacy has been an open secret for months; yesterday's announcement was a formality, the kind of anti-climax typical of the early stage of a long campaign. So, as if to give his candidacy some born-again urgency, McCain made his declaration in the comparatively edgy environment of late night television.

"I am announcing that I will be a candidate for president of the United States," said McCain during an appearance on CBS's "Late Show With David Letterman".

McCain went on to say that he would formally announce his candidacy in April, and, in a small, but telling bit of candor, admitted that his on-air declaration was merely a part of an ongoing process of in which he would gradually unveil his campaign - effectively stretching out the announcement to maximize media coverage.

"You know you drag this out as long as you can.," said McCain. "You don't just have one rendition - you've got to do it over and over."

It's a technique that has become popular with presidential candidates trying to get as much free exposure as possible before the primary season goes into full swing and the costs of ad purchases start to mount.

McCain's appearance with Letterman - a late night icon who gleefully skewers the Bush administration and once dismissed comments by Fox commentator Bill O'Reilly as "crap" - also provided McCain the chance to continue his revival as the GOP's angriest man.

That outsider role served the former Navy pilot and Vietnam War prisoner well during his vibrant but futile attempt to gain the Republican nomination in 2000. McCain was finally vanquished by George W. Bush. And even though he has emerged as one of the Senate's most consistent supporters of the Iraq war, McCain, on the stump, has already begun reasserting himself as the go-to-guy for party dissidents and for Democrats who might be enticed by the candidate's reputation for straight talk.

Campaigning in South Carolina last week, McCain called former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, "one of the worst secretaries of defense in history," and he has railed against the management of the war if not the conflict itself.

McCain has also irked the GOP's social conservative base by refusing to back a constitutional amendment barring gay marriage saying the issue is a matter for the states.

In most polls, McCain trails former New York Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani among Republican voters. However Giuliani, a moderate, is also facing an uphill run against the party's religious right wing.

What Giuliani doesn't have, are the questions about age that may dog McCain. On "Letterman" the talk show host noted that the Arizona senator just turned 70. If elected, McCain would be the second oldest person ever to take the oath, after Ronald Reagan who was 73 at the time of his inauguration.

McCain laughed off Letterman's age talk, and said he was undaunted by the polls.

"We keep doing the best we can," McCain said. "We're very happy with the way things are going."

Iran blames U.S., Israel for world’s problems - Focus on Iran - MSNBC.com

Iran blames U.S., Israel for world’s problems - MSNBC.com

Iran blames U.S., Israel for world’s problems

Ahmadinejad makes remarks during show of support for Sudan government

The Associated Press
Updated: 6:41 a.m. ET March 1, 2007

KHARTOUM, Sudan - Iran’s president blamed the United States and Israel for the world’s problems Thursday in a lecture to Sudanese officials and intellectuals during his visit to Sudan.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s comments came as Iran and Sudan face mounting international criticism — Iran over its nuclear activities and Sudan over the conflict in Darfur.

Earlier, Iranian and Saudi media reported that the hardline president was planning a trip to Saudi Arabia in coming days. The rival countries have been holding talks for weeks in an effort to defuse conflicts in the region, including the sectarian strife in Lebanon and Iraq.

In his lecture Thursday titled “Iran and the World,” the hardline president reiterated arguments that he has made repeatedly throughout the standoff with the United States and its Western allies over Iran’s nuclear activities.

“There is no place in the world that suffers from divisions and wars unless America or the Zionists’ fingerprints are seen there,” Ahmadinejad told his audience in Farsi translated into Arabic.

‘We have to pay attention to the devils’
He urged Muslims to rally behind Iran and accused detractors of Iran’s nuclear program of trying to prevent a developing country from making scientific advances.

“Our strength and the cornerstone of the victory is in our (Muslims’) unity ... we have to pay attention to the devils who want to cause divisions among us,” the Iranian president said.

“They want to keep science in their hands only ... they don’t want the rest of the world to progress,” he said referring Iran’s nuclear program.

Show of solidarity
Ahmadinejad arrived in Khartoum, the Sudanese capital, Wednesday in a show of solidarity with Sudan.

Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir declared support for Iran’s nuclear ambitions while Ahmadinejad said Iran viewed Sudan’s progress as important as its own.

Permanent members of the United Nations Security Council and Germany have begun discussing a new round of sanctions on Iran for failing to halt uranium enrichment by late February.

Meanwhile, the International Criminal Court’s chief prosecutor accused a junior member of al-Bashir’s Cabinet and another suspect of committing war crimes and crimes against humanity in Darfur.

The Sudanese government has rejected the allegations and said it would not hand the men over for trial.
© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17396804/
© 2007 MSNBC.com

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Market Is Stable After Tuesday’s Steep Decline

NEW YORK TIMES
After suffering its steepest drop in nearly four years, the stock market showed some tentative signs of recovery today, rising slightly in early trading.

Investors watched stocks on computer and TV screens at Tianyuan Securities Co.
Markets in Tokyo and elsewhere across Asia declined again on Wednesday.

At the opening bell of the New York Stock Exchange at 9:30, share prices advanced enough to push both the Dow Jones industrial average and the Standard and Poor’s 500-stock index above Tuesday’s closing levels. The gains were small, however, and sometimes fleeting as both indexes fluctuated in and out of positive territory.

The broad global sell-off of stocks on Tuesday wiped out the gains the Dow and the S.& P. made for the year. At the end of the trading day, both indexes had values about equal to where they stood at the end of November. The Dow lost 416 points, or about 3.3 percent. The broader S.& P. lost about 3.5 percent of its value.

The Nasdaq composite index, heavy with technology stocks, fell 3.9 percent on Tuesday and continued to slump in early trading today.

Across the world, stock markets continued to feel the fallout from Tuesday’s global dive. Stock markets fell sharply across most of Asia again and continued to decline in Europe.

But share prices rebounded in Shanghai and Shenzhen, the mainland Chinese stock markets that had been the first to tumble in Tuesday’s global sell-off, when they each fell nearly 9 percent.

Both mainland Chinese markets rose nearly 4 percent today after state-controlled media reported that the government might allow greater foreign investment in Chinese stocks and would not impose capital gains taxes on stocks soon.

Stock markets elsewhere fared much worse today.

In Tokyo, the benchmark Nikkei 225 index fell 4.1 percent in early trading, before recovering a bit to end the day down 2.9 percent.

In Hong Kong, the Hang Seng index fell 2.5 percent. It, too, showed a slight recovery from heavier losses in morning trading.

Practically every other stock index in Asia outside of mainland China also fell.

Major European markets opened with swift, steep falls, but soon began to retrace some of losses, and by early afternoon had pared their losses to around 1 percent. Investors in Asia and Europe appeared to pay less attention to the Chinese markets than to the drop on Tuesday in American stock indices, and to a Commerce Department report on Tuesday that manufacturing in the United States is ailing more than had previously been realized.

Given the rebound today in mainland Chinese stocks, “this morning’s price reaction in Europe shows it is not just China,” Nigel Richardson, the Hong Kong-based chief investment officer in Asia for AXA Investment Managers, said.

The managing director general of the Asian Development Bank, Rajat M. Nag, said in an interview in Hong Kong this morning that the economic fundamentals of most Asian economies were strong. But the region remains dependent on exports, especially to the United States, Mr. Nag said. China is among the most dependent of all, he said, with international trade in goods equal to 65 percent of its economic output last year.

“We are still fairly bullish on the Chinese economy’s growth potential,” Mr. Nag said, but he added that its dependence on exports “is a vulnerability.”

China’s current difficulties are partly a case of the Beijing government getting what it wished for, only to regret it.

The Chinese government has limited the appreciation of the country’s currency, the yuan, by buying dollars on a massive scale. As a result, it has accumulated more than $1 trillion in foreign exchange reserves.

To pay for the dollars, the Chinese central bank has issued hundreds of billions of yuan.

The central bank has been able to absorb some of these extra yuan by selling more government bonds to Chinese banks and the public. But part of the extra cash issued to pay for currency market intervention has made its way into the financial system.

This has contributed to steep rises in stock prices — the Shanghai stock market rose 130 percent last year — and in real estate prices. The slump in share prices on Tuesday has raised questions about the long-term sustainability of high prices for Chinese assets.

But it remains unclear how much the rest of the world should care about mainland Chinese stock market prices.

Government regulations have kept foreign investment in these markets to insignificant levels by international standards. In addition, most Chinese still put their money in bank accounts or in real estate instead of buying stocks, and Tuesday’s plunge, while dramatic, merely returned the Shanghai stock market to where it began the month.

The consensus of economists today was that the volatility in mainland stocks would have little if any effect on the enduring strength of economic growth in China.

The stocks of Asian companies that export to the United States, such as the Sony Corporation, suffered particularly heavy losses today following the report on Tuesday from the Commerce Department that orders for cars, washing machines and other durable goods dropped 8 percent in January.

“There is a worry that U.S. consumption could slow substantially, and that is a much bigger factor than China’s stock market,” the chief Asia economist in the Hong Kong offices of Credit Suisse, Tao Dong, said.

Analysts said the biggest factors were concerns about a possible downturn by the American economy and whether that would lead to cuts in interest rates by the Federal Reserve. That could in turn undermine the value of Japan’s currency, the yen. They said the effect of the Shanghai drop was felt indirectly via its impact on New York.

Many investors in Tokyo took a wait-and-see attitude on Wednesday, staying on the sidelines and watching for signs of whether the sell-off would continue in New York.

“What comes next here really depends on New York, not Shanghai,” said Eiji Kinouchi, chief technical analyst at the research arm of Daiwa Securities in Tokyo. “If Shanghai had been the real cause of the sell-off, it would have happened yesterday, not today.”

Tokyo and Hong Kong markets had barely seemed to blink on Tuesday as Shanghai fell. The Nikkei 225 index slipped a mere 0.5 percent that day and the Hang Seng fell 1.8 percent.

Analysts pointed out that Tokyo and even Hong Kong have rarely taken their cues from Shanghai, a small and highly volatile market that often seems to sit on the fringes of global capital flows because of the government regulations that have limited foreign investments to less than 1 percent of the market capitalization.

One factor behind the rebound today in mainland markets was a report in the Shanghai media that the government might increase the cap on foreign investment to 10 percent of the market. That report, together with signs the government would not move quickly to impose capital gains taxes, helped offset continuing nervousness about the Chinese central bank’s ongoing campaign to put the brakes on the economy by pushing banks to slow their rapid growth in lending.

Elsewhere in Asia today, the Indian market fell 4 percent, Singapore dropped 3.7 percent, South Korea was down 2.8 percent, Australia dipped 2.7 percent and Thailand crept down by 1 percent. Most markets pared their losses in the afternoon following steeper declines in the morning.

The worst performer for the day in Asia was the Philippines, the market with the earliest closing time. It fell nearly 8 percent without benefiting from the afternoon rebounds elsewhere. Foreign investors were the main sellers in the Philippines and many other markets.

Luz Lorenzo, an economist in Manila at ATR Kim Eng Securities, said that were it not for purchases by domestic institutions in the Philippines on Wednesday “it could have been worse.”

The broad extent of the decline in Asia underlined the region’s deepening connection to global financial markets and growing reliance on exports to the industrialized world.

“Every morning, most traders will get a fix on how the Asian markets are trading and how did the Nasdaq close — I think people have gotten more globalized,” Sandeep Nanda, head of research at Sharekhan, a large retail brokerage firm in India, said.

Some customers at brokerages in Asia admitted to being mystified by the sharp movements in share prices. “I am buying in the hope that the share price will rise — I really feel like a gambler sometimes,” said Moon Chung-lien, a 65-year-old retiree who wore a puzzled expression and knitted brow as he busily punched stock codes into a computer at the Hong Kong offices of the Shanghai Commercial Bank early this afternoon.

Tim Condon, the head of financial markets research at ING Financial Markets in Singapore, said that the most significant feature of the worldwide drop in stock markets was that it was the first such global shock to financial markets that has emerged from China.

“It’s a recognition of the fact that China is a big part of the rally in risky assets,“ Mr. Condon said.

The sharp drop in durable goods orders in the United States prompted concerns that Ben Bernanke, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, may be forced to cut interest rates to reinvigorate economic growth. Lower interest rates would be likely to drive down the dollar versus the yen, hurting the profits of exporters, such as Toyota and Sony, by eroding the yen value of overseas profits.

The prospect of lower American interest rates brought a sharp rise by the yen overnight in New York, where it climbed from about 120 yen per dollar to around 117.93 yen. In Tokyo trading, the yen yielded some of those gains, slipping to 118.32 yen.

The possibility of rate cuts by the Federal Reserve also kindled concerns that American interest rates might eventually fall far enough to significantly close the gap with Japan’s rock-bottom rates. That gap is wide now. Japanese overnight lending rates are 0.5 percent compared to 5.25 percent in the United States.

But if the gap shrinks, it could slow or halt the so-called yen carry trade, in which investors borrow hundreds of billions of dollars worth of Japanese money to invest in stock markets across Asia and around the world in search of higher returns.

If this flow of money stops, or reverses, it could prompt larger sell-offs on Wall Street and drive the yen even higher, hurting Japanese exporters even more, analysts said.

“Bernanke holds the trigger,” said Kiichi Fujita, a strategist in Tokyo for Nomura Securities. “If he cuts interest rates in America, the worry is that the yen carry trade will unwind.”

Part of the financing for the abundant cash flowing through global markets has also come from what many economists say is a surplus of savings by China, including China’s more than $1 trillion in foreign exchange reserves. China is now a leading source of global capital, with the money funneled back into global financial markets through Chinese investments in Treasury bonds and other securities. “So when people get anxious that China may turn that tap off, we get market reactions like yesterday,” Mr. Condon said.

In Thailand and many other southeast Asian countries, a major concern is the prospect of further weakness in the dollar, combined with weak demand from the United States. Thai exports of cars, rice, sugar, and electronics have already become more expensive on the world market after a 17 percent rise by the baht against the dollar in 2006.

There is less concern in Thailand about the stock market. The Thai market has been dragged down by the country’s long-running political crisis. It fell about 5 percent in 2006, even as Shanghai’s market rose 130 percent last year.

Supavud Saicheua, the managing director of Phatra Securities, which conducts research for Merrill Lynch in Thailand, said that the Thai market was unlikely to fall much further. But he cautioned that it was hard to predict how long international stock markets would continue to be worried by broader concerns.

“The problem,” Mr. Supavud said, “is that we don’t know how big of a worry this is going to be.”

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

US funds terror groups to sow chaos in Iran

london telegraph
America is secretly funding militant ethnic separatist groups in Iran in an attempt to pile pressure on the Islamic regime to give up its nuclear programme.

In a move that reflects Washington's growing concern with the failure of diplomatic initiatives, CIA officials are understood to be helping opposition militias among the numerous ethnic minority groups clustered in Iran's border regions.

The operations are controversial because they involve dealing with movements that resort to terrorist methods in pursuit of their grievances against the Iranian regime.

In the past year there has been a wave of unrest in ethnic minority border areas of Iran, with bombing and assassination campaigns against soldiers and government officials.

Such incidents have been carried out by the Kurds in the west, the Azeris in the north-west, the Ahwazi Arabs in the south-west, and the Baluchis in the south-east. Non-Persians make up nearly 40 per cent of Iran's 69 million population, with around 16 million Azeris, seven million Kurds, five million Ahwazis and one million Baluchis. Most Baluchis live over the border in Pakistan.

advertisementFunding for their separatist causes comes directly from the CIA's classified budget but is now "no great secret", according to one former high-ranking CIA official in Washington who spoke anonymously to The Sunday Telegraph.

His claims were backed by Fred Burton, a former US state department counter-terrorism agent, who said: "The latest attacks inside Iran fall in line with US efforts to supply and train Iran's ethnic minorities to destabilise the Iranian regime."

Although Washington officially denies involvement in such activity, Teheran has long claimed to detect the hand of both America and Britain in attacks by guerrilla groups on its internal security forces. Last Monday, Iran publicly hanged a man, Nasrollah Shanbe Zehi, for his involvement in a bomb attack that killed 11 Revolutionary Guards in the city of Zahedan in Sistan-Baluchistan. An unnamed local official told the semi-official Fars news agency that weapons used in the attack were British and US-made.

Yesterday, Iranian forces also claimed to have killed 17 rebels described as "mercenary elements" in clashes near the Turkish border, which is a stronghold of the Pejak, a Kurdish militant party linked to Turkey's outlawed PKK Kurdistan Workers' Party.

John Pike, the head of the influential Global Security think tank in Washington, said: "The activities of the ethnic groups have hotted up over the last two years and it would be a scandal if that was not at least in part the result of CIA activity."

Such a policy is fraught with risk, however. Many of the groups share little common cause with Washington other than their opposition to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, whose regime they accuse of stepping up repression of minority rights and culture.

The Baluchistan-based Brigade of God group, which last year kidnapped and killed eight Iranian soldiers, is a volatile Sunni organisation that many fear could easily turn against Washington after taking its money.

A row has also broken out in Washington over whether to "unleash" the military wing of the Mujahedeen-e Khalq (MEK), an Iraq-based Iranian opposition group with a long and bloody history of armed opposition to the Iranian regime.

The group is currently listed by the US state department as terrorist organisation, but Mr Pike said: "A faction in the Defence Department wants to unleash them. They could never overthrow the current Iranian regime but they might cause a lot of damage."

At present, none of the opposition groups are much more than irritants to Teheran, but US analysts believe that they could become emboldened if the regime was attacked by America or Israel. Such a prospect began to look more likely last week, as the UN Security Council deadline passed for Iran to stop its uranium enrichment programme, and a second American aircraft carrier joined the build up of US naval power off Iran's southern coastal waters.

The US has also moved six heavy bombers from a British base on the Pacific island of Diego Garcia to the Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, which could allow them to carry out strikes on Iran without seeking permission from Downing Street.

While Tony Blair reiterated last week that Britain still wanted a diplomatic solution to the crisis, US Vice-President Dick Cheney yesterday insisted that military force was a real possibility.

"It would be a serious mistake if a nation like Iran were to become a nuclear power," Mr Cheney warned during a visit to Australia. "All options are still on the table."

The five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany will meet in London tomorrow to discuss further punitive measures against Iran. Sanctions barring the transfer of nuclear technology and know-how were imposed in December. Additional penalties might include a travel ban on senior Iranian officials and restrictions on non-nuclear business.

Additional reporting by Gethin Chamberlain.

Monday, February 26, 2007

BBC NEWS | Middle East | US finds 'Iran-made' arms in Iraq

BBC NEWS | Middle East | US finds 'Iran-made' arms in Iraq

US finds 'Iran-made' arms in Iraq
The US military in Iraq says it has uncovered a large cache of weapons, many of them made in Iran.
The collection of shells, rockets and materials to make armour-piercing bombs was found in the village of Jadidah, 25km (15 miles) north of Baghdad.

A US spokesman said there was no way to "tie the weapons to any government".

This month the US presented evidence it said proved the "highest levels" of Iran's government were supplying arms used by Shia militants in Iraq.

However, the most senior US military officer, Gen Peter Pace, later appeared to contradict the claim, saying there was no proof the Iranian government had directly armed Shia groups.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad Ali Hosseini called the US allegations baseless propaganda.

Tank-piercing

The US military said the latest cache of 120mm mortar rounds, 122mm rockets and bags of C4 plastic explosives were of Iranian origin.

Maj Jeremy Siegrist said the cache was found near a village stronghold of the Shia Mehdi Army of leading cleric Moqtada al-Sadr.

But Maj Siegrist said: "I don't think there's any way this can be tied to a government."

Earlier this month US defence officials in Baghdad told reporters that the Iranians were supplying sophisticated bombs capable of penetrating the armour of a US-made Abrams tank.

Gen Pace, while saying the arms were Iranian in origin, said he could not say whether Tehran was complicit.

The White House stood by the original claim, saying the weapons were being moved into Iraq by Iran's Revolutionary Guards, or al-Quds force.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/6398089.stm

Published: 2007/02/26 15:42:08 GMT

© BBC MMVII

BBC NEWS | Middle East | US finds 'Iran-made' arms in Iraq

BBC NEWS | Middle East | US finds 'Iran-made' arms in Iraq

US finds 'Iran-made' arms in Iraq
The US military in Iraq says it has uncovered a large cache of weapons, many of them made in Iran.
The collection of shells, rockets and materials to make armour-piercing bombs was found in the village of Jadidah, 25km (15 miles) north of Baghdad.

A US spokesman said there was no way to "tie the weapons to any government".

This month the US presented evidence it said proved the "highest levels" of Iran's government were supplying arms used by Shia militants in Iraq.

However, the most senior US military officer, Gen Peter Pace, later appeared to contradict the claim, saying there was no proof the Iranian government had directly armed Shia groups.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad Ali Hosseini called the US allegations baseless propaganda.

Tank-piercing

The US military said the latest cache of 120mm mortar rounds, 122mm rockets and bags of C4 plastic explosives were of Iranian origin.

Maj Jeremy Siegrist said the cache was found near a village stronghold of the Shia Mehdi Army of leading cleric Moqtada al-Sadr.

But Maj Siegrist said: "I don't think there's any way this can be tied to a government."

Earlier this month US defence officials in Baghdad told reporters that the Iranians were supplying sophisticated bombs capable of penetrating the armour of a US-made Abrams tank.

Gen Pace, while saying the arms were Iranian in origin, said he could not say whether Tehran was complicit.

The White House stood by the original claim, saying the weapons were being moved into Iraq by Iran's Revolutionary Guards, or al-Quds force.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/6398089.stm

Published: 2007/02/26 15:42:08 GMT

© BBC MMVII

BBC NEWS | Technology | World's tiniest RFID tag unveiled

BBC NEWS | Technology | World's tiniest RFID tag unveiled

World's tiniest RFID tag unveiled
The world's smallest radio frequency identification tags have been unveiled by Japanese electronics firm Hitachi.
The minute devices measure just 0.05mm by 0.05mm (0.002x0.002in) and to the naked eye look like spots of powder.

They are thin enough to be embedded in a sheet of paper, Hitachi spokesman Masayuki Takeuchi says.

RFID tags store data about the objects they are attached to, and companies are vying to create increasingly tiny versions.

Recently, Hitachi unveiled another RFID tag, the Mu-chip, which measures 0.4mm by 0.4mm (0.02x0.02in).

But the latest chips, which are yet to be named, can hold the same amount of data as the Mu even though they are much smaller.

They have one major issue, however - they need an external antenna to work, and the smallest antenna developed so far is about 80 times bigger than the tags.

Hitachi says it wants to study the tags' possible uses, but it does not yet have any plans to put its latest creation into commercial production.

Spy-tags

Unlike its predecessor, the barcode, an RFID tag's data can be extracted from afar - sometimes from hundreds of metres away - by radio-reading devices, and the technology is already widely used.

Stores use it to track stock in warehouses and shops. Some countries are using the tags to hold passport data or for payments in transport systems, and they are even being used for animal identification.

However, some have raised concerns that the technology poses a threat to privacy, and that it could be used in covert monitoring schemes.

And the fact that they are becoming ever more invisible could fuel this apprehension.

However, said Mr Takeuchi: "We are not imagining such uses."

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/technology/6389581.stm

Published: 2007/02/23 13:23:38 GMT

© BBC MMVII

Saturday, February 24, 2007

New Airport X-Rays Scan Bodies, Not Just Bags - New York Times

New Airport X-Rays Scan Bodies, Not Just Bags - New York Times

February 24, 2007

New Airport X-Rays Scan Bodies, Not Just Bags

By PAUL GIBLIN and ERIC LIPTON

PHOENIX, Feb. 23 — X-ray vision has come to the airport checkpoint here, courtesy of federal aviation security officials who have installed a new device that peeks underneath passengers’ clothing to search for guns, bombs or liquid explosives.

The new body scanning machine, which went into use on Friday at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport and will be tested later at airports in Los Angeles and New York, will screen only volunteers, at least initially. Transportation Security Administration officials want to make sure the machine is reliable and fast enough to replace the traditional pat-down — and that it does not provoke too many protests.

Security officials examining the head-to-toe images work in a closed booth, hidden from public view, agency officials said. Special “privacy” software intentionally blurs the image, creating an outline of a body that is clear enough to see a collarbone, bellybutton or weapon, but flattens details of revealing contours.

Kenneth Johnson, 64, of Mesa, was the first passenger screened on Friday in Phoenix. He said he had titanium implants in both shoulders and one knee that set off alarms at checkpoint metal detectors.

“I’ve been all over the world; I’ve been strip-searched,” Mr. Johnson, who was traveling to Florida, told an Associated Press reporter. “This was very easy.”

Others found the scans objectionable.

“I think that is a violation of people’s personal rights,” said Kara Neal, 36, a mental health counselor on her way to Philadelphia. She was not asked to undergo the screening, but said she would have refused. “I would rather take a pat-down than go through this,” she said.

Lawyers for the American Civil Liberties Union have raised similar objections, calling the X-ray scan a “virtual strip-search,” and have urged Congress to prohibit its use for routine screening.

The vending-machine-size device, which costs about $110,000, will be used only when passengers are pulled aside for a more thorough check, known as secondary screening, after passing through a metal detector. Other scanning machines will be installed this year at Los Angeles International Airport and at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York.

While security agency officials say the machines, known as SmartCheck, pose no health hazards, some experts disagree. The machine, manufactured by American Science and Engineering Inc. of Billerica, Mass., generates about as much radiation as a passenger would get flying for about two minutes at about 30,000 feet, or in technical terms, fewer than 10 microRem per scan, according to security agency and company officials. The machine is already being used in some prisons, by United States customs and at Heathrow Airport in London.

Dr. Albert J. Fornace Jr., an expert in molecular oncology at Georgetown University Medical Center, said such a low dose was inconsequential, even for pregnant women.

“Obviously, no radiation is even better than even a very low level,” Dr. Fornace said. “But this is trivial.”

But David J. Brenner, a professor of radiation oncology at Columbia University, said that even though the risk for any individual was extremely low, he would still avoid it.

“The question is, Do you want to add to your already existing risk?” Professor Brenner said, recommending that pregnant women and young children, in particular, avoid the device. “There are other technologies around that can probably do the job just as well without the extra radiation.”

The machine beams a low-energy X-ray at the passenger, which after it bounces off the surface of the skin is processed by computer software that highlights metals or elements like nitrogen that are found in explosives or weapons.

The X-ray is not strong enough to penetrate much beyond the skin, so it cannot find weapons that may be hidden in body cavities.

“A lot of people aren’t really comfortable with a pat-down,” said Ellen Howe, a security agency spokeswoman, “so they may find this to be an alternative they may appreciate.” She added that the X-ray images would be destroyed immediately.

Aviation security officials are rushing to bring new screening devices to airports because of the London-based plot last summer to use liquid explosives to blow up airliners headed to the United States.

The devices now used at the nation’s airports, the X-ray machine for carry-on bags and the metal detector for passengers, rely on 1950s-era technology that cannot reliably detect liquid or plastic explosives.

Earlier efforts by the federal security agency to introduce more advanced checkpoint technologies have stumbled, including the so-called puffer machines, which blow air on passengers to search for minute traces of explosives.

After installing 94 of the machines at 37 airports, officials suspended the program last year, saying the devices broke down too often. More puffer machines may be bought if the problems can be resolved.

Officials intend to try other alternatives, like a so-called millimeter wave machine that uses harmless radio waves, instead of X-rays, to do a full body scan.

Ms. Howe said that until the tests on the SmartCheck were complete, it was unclear how widely used the machines would be. “We are committed to testing it,” she said. “But we are not committed to deploying it widely until we learn more.”

Friday, February 23, 2007

Micro RFID chips raise privacy concerns

dailyaztec

Science fiction movies and books often portray the future as a world in which every individual has been tattooed with a barcode and can be easily traced by anyone at any time. However bleak this image is, recent advancements in radio frequency identification have shown us pieces of this bleak world and a possible utopia.

RFID is a technology that uses small microchips to transmit stored data through the use of radio frequencies.

A common RFID application is the FasTrak electronic toll-payment system used by Caltrans on highways around California. The FasTrak badge is a type of RFID transponder that uses radio signals to send credit card information to the radio terminal at a toll station.

While this sort of technology has been in use in California since the early 1990s, the most recent application of this technology has shown promise for the future, as well as some questionable features. Some retailers use RFID to track the whereabouts of products in stores and to have the ability to see if a certain product has been stocked improperly.

Many people fear that as RFID technology gets cheaper and easier to use it will be misused at the public's expense. Groups of privacy advocates fear a sort of Orwellian future with every individual being implanted with an RFID chip to eliminate the need for money and forms of identification, thus making us lose our individuality because they would branded like cattle.

Such startling uses have been put into practice already. Several nightclubs in Europe have implanted RFID chips in their VIP members to make it easier for them to gain access to exclusive places. While this application is quite odd, the fear of the government using RFID to track Americans is a greater fear. The government could possibly know the whereabouts of all its citizens at any given time if a nationwide application to RFID was used.

On Valentine's Day, Japanese chip maker Hitachi unveiled a new advancement in RFID technology to further any speculation of the possible misuses. Hitachi showed the world the creation of RFID powder. Hitachi developed what it calls mu-chips or .05 mm by .05 mm RFID chips, which are smaller than a grain of rice.

There were immediate speculations of the possibility that a person could be given an RFID chip and not know. It could be inconspicuously slipped into food, clothing or one's body given its ultra-small size. It even has the possibility of being embedded within a piece of paper and effortlessly track the whereabouts of any person.

Debra Bowen, who is running for Secretary of State, said in a 2003 hearing, "How would you like it if, for instance, one day you realized your underwear was reporting on your whereabouts?" There is an inherent fear that America's consumer society would be amplified even more so with corporations reporting our whereabouts in order to increase the effectiveness of advertising that would entice people to purchase more. Should Best Buy employees really know that you went to Circuit City after you discovered its prices are higher?

However, the technology's possible practical applications could rival any misuse. The U.S. government is already placing RFID chips in passports for electronic identification of citizens and to deter forgeries. If the mu-chips were to be embedded in paper and money, counterfeit documents and money could be a thing of the past. If stolen, a mu-chip unknown to the thief could be used in tracking the document in question once it passes through RFID readers in an unauthorized area. The proof of a legal document could be proven with RFID technology and $100 bills would no longer require the meticulous inspection upon its use.

Consumer buying trends, product tracking and data collection could be better than ever with the application of the technology to a greater degree.

Privacy in the United States and identification systems must balance each other out in the future with the increasing questioning and development of the RFID technology. Whether the technology can be misused will be debated for a long time; however, forms of RFID will be continuous because it's like any other technological advancement that will help people in the future.

What else can Israel ask of President Bush?

Rice
haaretz
A hackneyed joke about former secretary of state Colin Powell's mission to Ramallah and Jerusalem in 2002, which began with an attempt to achieve a cease-fire and ended in a loud squabble with Yasser Arafat, was revived this week in a corridor conversation between a visiting Israeli and a Washingtonian friend. "Powell's mission was somewhat successful. He came back alive," quoted the visitor. The context: Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's visit to the Middle East this week. She too came back alive, "If you can call that alive," commented the Israeli visitor.

Rice went to the Middle East with no expectations and returned with no achievements. The Mecca agreement has a golden share in this unsurprising failure. But a place of honor is also reserved for Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. In recent months Olmert has been criticized from every direction and in every possible area. But one thing cannot be taken from him: There is no one more adept at power games and sparring with political rivals than he is. This week he demonstrated this again, in the moves that preceded the tripartite summit in Jerusalem. Rice did not manage to do much to stop him.

Olmert knows that there are those in President George W. Bush's camp who are also baffled by Rice's diplomatic activism. Statements that she made in interviews last week reminded some of them of former president Bill Clinton's delusional months leading up to Camp David. On Friday, when Rice was en route to the region, Olmert and Bush spoke on the phone. It is not clear who called whom, and what exactly was said, but Olmert announced after the conversation that Bush is in line with him about insisting on "the Quartet's conditions" for the Palestinian government: recognize Israel, renounce terror and honor previous Palestinian-Israeli agreements. Rice's aides quickly took note of the message. Their Israeli interlocutors had gotten the impression that they sounded more committed and determined than before to enforce the Quartet's conditions and to boycott the Palestinian unity government.

Bush

In recent weeks there has been lively discussion in Jerusalem surrounding the question of where these special relations are headed, and whether it is a good idea to ask Bush for a farewell gift. Some believe that since Bush is the best thing to ever happen to Israel, it is important to exploit the remainder of his term to upgrade relations.

But what should be upgraded, and how, is up for debate. Yoram Ben-Zeev, the deputy director for North America at the Foreign Ministry, has led a series of discussions on the creation of a new umbrella agreement that would combine all the memoranda of understanding between the United States and Israel, give them new validity and highlight the special nature of the relations.

Former Foreign Ministry director general Ron Prosor offered a different approach. Instead of formulating a large agreement, it would be better if Bush gave a quiet order to the bureaucracy in Washington to support Israel on a number of sensitive issues. Prosor's approach is that at a time when U.S. opposition to military involvement in the Middle East is surging, Israel can show some consideration. Instead of asking for defense treaties, it should simply say: "Give us the tools and we'll do the work."

There are three Israeli upgrade requests in the pipeline, one of which concerns civilian cooperation in the nuclear file - now limited because of Israel's refusal to join the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT). The exemption India received from these restrictions has encouraged the Israel Atomic Energy Commission to try to obtain similar easements, even if they are limited. Other requests concerned access to advanced military technology for quality intelligence - a hint at a possible conflict with Iran.

Senior officials in the defense establishment believe that Israel should strive for the achievement of an increase in American military aid. The current agreement that defines American aid to Israel will expire next year, and with it the civilian economic aid will end as well. Israel wants another $50 million annually in the coming decade to be added to the sum it receives for military aid - which currently stands at $2.4 billion a year. The government has accepted this position and has decided that the increase in aid should be the main focus, that it would be better to put the other upgrade requests on a back burner for now.

Iran complains of nuclear bullying

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) -- Critics of Iran's nuclear program are "bullying" Iran, its current president and a former president declared Friday, as they put up a united front a day after the United Nations' nuclear watchdog issued a report that opens the way for additional sanctions against Iran.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and influential former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani lashed out in separate speeches Friday at Western countries and the U.N. Security Council, though without naming them directly.

Their comments appeared as senior diplomats from the five permanent Security Council members and Germany prepared to meet on Monday in London to start work on a new resolution to try to pressure Iran to suspend its nuclear program.

U.S. Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns, who announced the London meeting in Washington, said Iran was "effectively thumbing its nose at the international community."

The speeches by Ahmadinejad and Rafsanjani appeared to show that the Iranian ruling establishment is closing ranks in the face of new measures against Iran.

Divisions emerged over Ahmadinejad's handling of the nuclear standoff following the council's adoption of limited economic sanctions against Iran in December.

Some Iranians believe Ahmadinejad has been too antagonistic of the U.S. and its allies. Rafsanjani in recent weeks has emerged as a high-level advocate of a more conciliatory stance toward the West in the nuclear dispute.

Ahmadinejad told thousands of people gathered in a northern Iranian town, "The Iranian nation has resisted all bullies and corrupt powers and it will fully defend its rights," state television quoted him as saying.

The hardline president appeared to dismiss the International Atomic Energy Agency report, which said Tehran had expanded its program of uranium enrichment and continued to build a heavy water reactor and related facilities. (Read the full report)

"If a few states do not believe that Iran's nuclear activities are peaceful, this is of no importance whatsoever," state television quoted the president as telling a rally in Fuman.

"This is the spirit of arrogance and culture of aggressive powers," the official Islamic Republic News Agency also quoted Ahmadinejad as saying during the same speech.

"If you pull back, they will push ahead but if you stand against them, because of this resistance, they will back off."

Meanwhile, the former President Rafsanjani told worshippers gathered for Friday prayers in Tehran that Western countries would fail to achieve anything by "bullying" Iran.

Rafsanjani, a high-ranking cleric, holds seats on two of Iran's most important government bodies.

"Following yesterday's report, they again began a harsh steps and threats while thinking about another resolution," Rafsanjani said in the speech broadcast live by state radio, adding "they will get nowhere this way."

The IAEA's report follows the expiration Wednesday of a 60-day grace period for Iran to halt uranium enrichment.

In a warning to the U.S. and its Western allies who want Iran to roll back its nuclear program, Rafsanjani said, "If you continue this bullying way, you will definitely make many troubles for yourselves, the world and the region."

But he also reiterated Iran's offer for talks. "We -- all of us, our officials, our leader -- are ready to provide you full assurances."
Three demands

The Security Council issued three demands to Iran when it adopted its resolution December 23 -- freeze uranium enrichment, stop building heavy water facilities and fully cooperate with the IAEA.

The U.S. and its Western allies have insisted Iran must suspend enrichment before it will enter any negotiations over its nuclear program -- a condition Tehran has rejected as it pushes ahead with developing its enrichment facilities.

Iran insists that its nuclear program is peaceful, but the U.S. and other Western countries accuse it of using it as a cover to develop weapons.

Among the permanent council members meeting in London on Monday, Britain and France are likely to join the U.S. in a call for harsher sanctions than Russia and China, which both have strong commercial ties to Tehran, will accept.

Diplomats said Thursday that new measures under consideration include a mandatory travel ban against individuals on the U.N. list, new individuals and companies subject to sanctions, additional prohibited items, economic measures such as a ban on export guarantees to Iran, and an expansion of the nuclear embargo to an arms embargo.

U.S. Undersecretary of State Burns said a new resolution was needed to "see Iran repudiated again" but said it was too soon to say what provisions the resolution might contain.

Russia's U.N. Ambassador Vitaly Churkin said he had "no substantive comment" on the IAEA report. "We should not lose sight of the goal -- and the goal is not to have a resolution or to impose sanctions," Churkin said. "The goal is to accomplish a political outcome."
Council unity

Several council diplomats have stressed the importance of maintaining council unity on a new resolution -- even if means sacrificing tougher sanctions.

Stressing the importance of unity, U.S. deputy ambassador Jackie Sanders said Thursday "we do need to ratchet up the pressure and Iran needs to see an international community that stays coordinated and showing common purpose to have them stop what they're doing in developing nuclear weapons."

French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy echoed the importance, saying, "unity and firmness are ... the only effective instruments we have to get Iran to turn toward the international community, and away from isolation."

"We support a second resolution, to be passed unanimously by the Security Council, to continue sanctions," he said.

Two diplomats, speaking on condition of anonymity because negotiations haven't even started, spoke of an "incremental" strengthening of sanctions in a new resolution to ensure that unity is preserved.

The permanent council members believe the initial sanctions have had some positive effects. Iran now says it wants negotiations, though it still refuses to suspend enrichment.

Whether new sanctions can bring Tehran to comply with the council's demands remains to be seen.

"It's Iran's refusal to talk which right now has gotten Iran in a lot of hot water," said Burns. "Iran is increasingly isolated, and we hope Iran is going to choose negotiations."

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Clinton-Obama: The Morning After

newyorktimes
The Clinton-Obama tempest drew a lot of media coverage in the last 24 hours, whipping around the Internet and on television like a brushfire. And Howard Wolfson, a top adviser to Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, continued to fan it with his “we’re-not-gonna-take-it” strategy against criticism of the Clintons, insisting again that Senator Barack Obama should denounce David Geffen’s remarks.

On MSNBC’s “Hardball,” Chris Matthews asked whether any shot against former President Bill Clinton — “the fact that he was impeached, his personal behavior” — would be met with a Clinton campaign charge of “dirty campaigning?” Yes, Mr. Wolfson replied, “bringing up personal behavior — I think that’s below the belt.”

Personal attacks, Mr. Wolfson said, are “unacceptable political discourse.”

Mr. Wolfson even suggested that the Obama campaign might have put Mr. Geffen up to making those remarks in an interview with The Times’s Maureen Dowd, another charge that Mr. Obama denied last night in Iowa. He said Mr. Geffen was entitled to his own opinions and wasn’t speaking for the Illinois Democrat’s campaign.

Pressed by Mr. Matthews as to why the Clinton campaign kept referring to Mr. Geffen as an Obama “finance chair” — which he is not — Mr. Wolfson basically shrugged and said you decide what to call someone who is the host of a million-dollar fund-raising event.

Every campaign has nicknames for their top donors; think of the Bush Rangers and Pioneers. But the Clintons, through two presidential races, two Senate races and now another presidential primary cycle, usually don’t refer to their big fundraisers and bundlers as official campaign finance chairs.

And the campaign seems to be taking on an added risk: Drawing repeated attention to Mr. Geffen’s comments gives Mrs. Clinton’s adversaries more opportunities to revisit the Lincoln bedroom stays by her husband’s top donors.

As for strategy, if this early tempest was a test-the-muscles of the Obama camp, we’re not going to call a winner on this round, (it’s not our place) even if the Clinton campaign is busily touting a Slate piece declaring Mrs. Clinton to have trumped Mr. Obama. And if this flap served to distract from the forum in Carson City, Nev., where Mrs. Clinton’s Iraq vote was questioned again, several of the other Democratic hopefuls signaled their intent to keep that issue alive.

“People know that the Clintons know how to fight back,” Mr. Wolfson told Mr. Matthews.

Yep. We’re in for a long campaign season. It’s only February 2007.

Soldier could avoid the death penalty after pleading guilty

wbir.com AP
A second Fort Campbell soldier pleaded guilty to the gang rape and murder of an Iraqi teenager.

Sergeant Paul Cortez told a military judge at the Army post he held down the girl and acted as lookout while three other soldiers attacked her.

In the plea agreement, Cortez said he conspired with Private First Class Jesse Spielman, Specialist James Barker and Steven Green, who has since been discharged, to rape of Abeer Qassim al-Janabi.

Colonel Stephen Henley will decide whether to accept the agreement.

Barker pleaded guilty in November and was sentenced to 90 years in prison.

Spielman and Bryan Howard await court-martial. Green is charged in federal court in Kentucky because he was discharged before the Army became aware of his suspected involvement.

All of the defendants are or were members of the 101st Airborne Division, which is based at Fort Campbell on the Tennessee-Kentucky state line near Clarksville.

IAEA: Iran Failed to Suspend Sensitive Nuclear Work by UN Deadline

voanews
The United Nations nuclear watchdog agency says Iran failed to suspend uranium enrichment as demanded by the U.N. Security Council.

The International Atomic Energy Agency issued the finding in a report to the Security Council Thursday, clearing the way for the council to possibly impose further sanctions on Iran.

On December 23, the council set a 60-day deadline for Iran to end the enrichment work, and banned Iran's trade in sensitive nuclear and missile technology.

Top Iranian officials say Tehran is ready to negotiate to resolve the nuclear standoff, but will not give up its right to pursue nuclear technology.

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice says world powers have a common goal of getting Iran to resume talks about its controversial nuclear program and to halt its enrichment activity.

Speaking after talks with her European and Russian counterparts in Berlin, Rice said all parties are determined to use "available channels and the U.N. Security Council to try to achieve that goal."

Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Wednesday the country's atomic program is important for Iran's "development and honor."

The United States and other major powers suspect Iran is trying to build nuclear weapons, a charge Tehran denies. Enriched uranium can be used as fuel for nuclear power, or, at more highly enriched levels, to build nuclear weapons.

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Dobbs:  Will the Democrats save their souls? - CNN.com

Dobbs:  Will the Democrats save their souls? - CNN.com

Dobbs: Will the Democrats save their souls?
By Lou Dobbs
CNN
Lou Dobbs' commentary appears weekly on CNN.com.

NEW YORK (CNN) -- The battle for the soul of the Democratic Party is under way. And the outcome of this battle will likely not be determined by any one of the rising number of candidates for the party's 2008 presidential nomination, but rather by the Democratic leadership on Capitol Hill.

The House of Representatives passed important legislation designed, at least politically, to focus on the needs of our middle class, beset by stagnating wages, failing public education, destructive so-called free trade policies, skyrocketing health care costs, out-of-control illegal immigration and the soaring price of higher education.

So in Congress' self-proclaimed first 100 hours, speaker Nancy Pelosi delivered on her promise to have the House pass bills raising the federal minimum wage, cutting interest rates on student loans and helping bring down the cost of prescription drugs. But none of that legislation has passed the Senate.

The ascension of the so-called Lou Dobbs Democrats in the November election gave hope to many that our representatives and senators were awakening to the need to represent the largest single group of voters in the country, 150 million working men and women and their families. The reality is, however, corporate America and special interests still dominate our legislative and electoral process.

A successful Democratic candidate running for his or her party's nomination is as dependent as any Republican seeking the nomination of his party, and $100 million is the price of the ticket. Who has the money? Corporate America and Wall Street, of course.

Corporate America will fight as hard to control the Democratic agenda as it has to control the Republican agenda in Washington. Of great service to their efforts will be the "think tanks" bent on preserving the status quo and the all-but-absolute domination of corporate America over our political process.

The Democratic Leadership Council is obviously frightened that my brand of independent populism is a threat. The council claims that I, and those who agree with me, "are simply, factually, decisively wrong about the strength of the U.S. manufacturing economy itself," and that the more than three million jobs lost in manufacturing are a testament to corporate America's technology-based efficiency, not outsourcing and offshoring to cheap foreign labor markets. Then why are foreign-produced imports rising so dramatically and taking an ever-larger share of many of the most important sectors of our economy?

The Third Way, which is supposedly a "strategy center for Progressives," has just published a new study called "The New Rules Economy: A Policy Framework for the 21st Century." Third Way's conclusion that the struggling middle class is a myth requires it to avoid the fact that the share of national income going to wages and salaries is now at the lowest level on record. At the same time, the share of national income captured by corporate profits is at its highest level in more than half a century.

In fact, wages from 2000 to 2006 for working men and women in this country increased at half the rate they normally do in a recovery. And, not surprisingly, corporate America's profits are increasing at double the historic rate in that six-year period.

The Third Way adds: "...While economic conservatism is premised on the myths of an infallible market and incompetent government, neo-populism is premised on the myths of a failing middle class, a declining America, and omnipotent corporations." I call that independent populism, not neo-populism. And I also call that truth.

The middle class is also working more hours than ever before: Thirty years ago Americans worked an average of 43 weeks, but now U.S. workers are putting in an average of 47 weeks per year, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That's in stark contrast to the rest of the industrialized world, where the number of hours worked in all other countries except for Canada has decreased over the past 30 years, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development reported.

About one-third of the families in this country bring in less than $35,000 of income each year, according to the Census Bureau, a figure that's nowhere close to ensuring the quality of life and standard of living to which many Americans have grown accustomed. I fear the American Dream may finally become the American Pipe Dream.

These families at the bottom of the wage scale are really struggling. According to the Federal Reserve's most recent comprehensive Survey of Consumer Finances (released every three years), average family income from 2001 to 2004 fell 2.3 percent, and the median net worth of the bottom 40 percent of families declined as well. And real median wages declined by more than 6 percent during the same period.

Why are the partisans of both political parties so committed to denying the economic and social reality we face? In the case of the Democratic Party, there seems to be a rising fear that more Lou Dobbs Democrats are on the way and are going to demand truth over slogans and an improving reality for working men and women rather than ideological posturing that will salve the corporate masters of both parties.

At least the Democrats still have a chance to save their souls.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the writer.

Find this article at:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/02/20/Dobbs.February21/index.html

Dobbs:  Will the Democrats save their souls? - CNN.com

Dobbs:  Will the Democrats save their souls? - CNN.com

Dobbs: Will the Democrats save their souls?
By Lou Dobbs
CNN
Lou Dobbs' commentary appears weekly on CNN.com.

NEW YORK (CNN) -- The battle for the soul of the Democratic Party is under way. And the outcome of this battle will likely not be determined by any one of the rising number of candidates for the party's 2008 presidential nomination, but rather by the Democratic leadership on Capitol Hill.

The House of Representatives passed important legislation designed, at least politically, to focus on the needs of our middle class, beset by stagnating wages, failing public education, destructive so-called free trade policies, skyrocketing health care costs, out-of-control illegal immigration and the soaring price of higher education.

So in Congress' self-proclaimed first 100 hours, speaker Nancy Pelosi delivered on her promise to have the House pass bills raising the federal minimum wage, cutting interest rates on student loans and helping bring down the cost of prescription drugs. But none of that legislation has passed the Senate.

The ascension of the so-called Lou Dobbs Democrats in the November election gave hope to many that our representatives and senators were awakening to the need to represent the largest single group of voters in the country, 150 million working men and women and their families. The reality is, however, corporate America and special interests still dominate our legislative and electoral process.

A successful Democratic candidate running for his or her party's nomination is as dependent as any Republican seeking the nomination of his party, and $100 million is the price of the ticket. Who has the money? Corporate America and Wall Street, of course.

Corporate America will fight as hard to control the Democratic agenda as it has to control the Republican agenda in Washington. Of great service to their efforts will be the "think tanks" bent on preserving the status quo and the all-but-absolute domination of corporate America over our political process.

The Democratic Leadership Council is obviously frightened that my brand of independent populism is a threat. The council claims that I, and those who agree with me, "are simply, factually, decisively wrong about the strength of the U.S. manufacturing economy itself," and that the more than three million jobs lost in manufacturing are a testament to corporate America's technology-based efficiency, not outsourcing and offshoring to cheap foreign labor markets. Then why are foreign-produced imports rising so dramatically and taking an ever-larger share of many of the most important sectors of our economy?

The Third Way, which is supposedly a "strategy center for Progressives," has just published a new study called "The New Rules Economy: A Policy Framework for the 21st Century." Third Way's conclusion that the struggling middle class is a myth requires it to avoid the fact that the share of national income going to wages and salaries is now at the lowest level on record. At the same time, the share of national income captured by corporate profits is at its highest level in more than half a century.

In fact, wages from 2000 to 2006 for working men and women in this country increased at half the rate they normally do in a recovery. And, not surprisingly, corporate America's profits are increasing at double the historic rate in that six-year period.

The Third Way adds: "...While economic conservatism is premised on the myths of an infallible market and incompetent government, neo-populism is premised on the myths of a failing middle class, a declining America, and omnipotent corporations." I call that independent populism, not neo-populism. And I also call that truth.

The middle class is also working more hours than ever before: Thirty years ago Americans worked an average of 43 weeks, but now U.S. workers are putting in an average of 47 weeks per year, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That's in stark contrast to the rest of the industrialized world, where the number of hours worked in all other countries except for Canada has decreased over the past 30 years, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development reported.

About one-third of the families in this country bring in less than $35,000 of income each year, according to the Census Bureau, a figure that's nowhere close to ensuring the quality of life and standard of living to which many Americans have grown accustomed. I fear the American Dream may finally become the American Pipe Dream.

These families at the bottom of the wage scale are really struggling. According to the Federal Reserve's most recent comprehensive Survey of Consumer Finances (released every three years), average family income from 2001 to 2004 fell 2.3 percent, and the median net worth of the bottom 40 percent of families declined as well. And real median wages declined by more than 6 percent during the same period.

Why are the partisans of both political parties so committed to denying the economic and social reality we face? In the case of the Democratic Party, there seems to be a rising fear that more Lou Dobbs Democrats are on the way and are going to demand truth over slogans and an improving reality for working men and women rather than ideological posturing that will salve the corporate masters of both parties.

At least the Democrats still have a chance to save their souls.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the writer.

Find this article at:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/02/20/Dobbs.February21/index.html

Audit: U.S. anti-terror statistics inflated - U.S. Security - MSNBC.com

Audit: U.S. anti-terror statistics inflated - U.S. Security - MSNBC.com

Audit: U.S. anti-terror statistics inflated

Marriage fraud, other non-terror issues counted in numbers since 9/11

The Associated Press
Updated: 11:05 p.m. ET Feb 20, 2007

WASHINGTON - Federal prosecutors counted immigration violations, marriage fraud and drug trafficking among anti-terror cases in the four years after 9/11 even though no evidence linked them to terror activity, a Justice Department audit said Tuesday.

Overall, nearly all of the terrorism-related statistics on investigations, referrals and cases examined by department Inspector General Glenn A. Fine were either diminished or inflated. Only two of 26 sets of department data reported between 2001 and 2005 were accurate, the audit found.

Responding, a Justice spokesman pointed to figures showing that prosecutors in the department's headquarters for the most part either accurately or underreported their data — underscoring what he called efforts to avoid pumping up federal terror statistics.

The numbers, used to monitor the department's progress in battling terrorists, are reported to Congress and the public and help, in part, shape the department's budget.

"For these and other reasons, it is essential that the department report accurate terrorism-related statistics," the audit concluded.

Fine's office took care to say the flawed data appear to be the result of "decentralized and haphazard" methods of collection or disagreement over how the numbers are reported, and do not appear to be intentional.

Still, the errors led Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., to question whether the department had exaggerated the number of terror cases.


"If the Department of Justice can't even get their own books in order, how are we supposed to have any confidence they are doing the job they should be?" said Schumer, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which oversees the department. "Whether this is just an accounting error or an attempt to pad terror prosecution statistics for some other reason, the Department of Justice of all places should be classifying cases for what they are, not what they want us to think them to be."

Auditors looked at 26 categories of statistics -- including numbers of suspects charged and convicted in terror cases, and terror-related threats against cities and other U.S. targets -- compiled by the FBI, Justice's Criminal Division, and the Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys.

Executive Office had most errors
It found that data from the Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys were the most severely flawed. Auditors said the office, which compiles statistics from the 94 federal prosecutors' districts nationwide, both under- and over-counted the number of terror-related cases during a four-year period.

The office has since agreed to change the way it counts and classifies anti-terrorism cases, said department spokesman Dean Boyd.

Boyd denied suggestions that the department pumped up its numbers. He said Criminal Division prosecutors at Justice headquarters and the FBI have overhauled their respective case reporting systems since 2004 for a more accurate picture of terror-related workloads. Both agencies, he said, were strained to accurately report terrorism data in the flood of cases immediately after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

"The notion that the Justice Department intentionally inflated its statistics is false and flatly contradicted by the OIG report itself," Boyd said.

In all but one area, Criminal Division prosecutors either accurately stated or underreported their data — the ones the department usually uses in public statements about its counterterror efforts, Boyd noted. He said the Justice Department has already completed most of the fixes recommended in the audit.

Much of the problem stemmed from how that office defines anti-terrorism cases.

Immigration arrests lumped in
A November 2001 federal crackdown on security breaches at airports, for example, yielded arrests on immigration and false document charges, but no evidence of terrorist activity. Nonetheless, the attorneys' office lumped them in with other anti-terror cases since they were investigated by federal Joint Terrorism Task Forces or with other counterterror measures.

Other examples, according to the audit, included:

Charges against a marriage-broker for being paid to arrange six fraudulent marriages between Tunisians and U.S. citizens.
Prosecution of a Mexican citizen who falsely identified himself as another person in a passport application.
Charges against a suspect for dealing firearms without a license. The prosecutor handling the case told auditors it should not have been labeled as anti-terrorism.
"We do not agree that law enforcement efforts such as these should be counted as anti-terrorism," the audit concluded.

© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17249651/