Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Northwest pilot from rural Glyndon alleges 9/11 cover-up

west central tribune
Field McConnell is convinced the 9/11 terrorist attacks are being covered up.

The Northwest Airlines pilot from rural Glyndon, Minn., said a second attack is imminent and conspirators already have aborted their plan once this year.
Those beliefs prompted him to begin writing for a Web site where like-minded people gather and to file a lawsuit in Fargo's federal court to expose an alleged conspiracy.

The lawsuit, filed last week, claims Boeing Co. and the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) can't assure him that B747-400 planes are safe. McConnell, who is the process of seeking an early retirement from Northwest, claims the planes are rigged by Boeing and can be remotely detonated.

“We do not believe in any way, shape or form that that is true,” said Pete Janhunen, a spokesman for ALPA, the world's largest pilot's union.

“Our senior lawyer and senior engineer both said that on its face, it's an insane complaint. … It sounds like he's a troubled guy.”

McConnell, a rural Glyndon rancher, has been a Northwest Airlines pilot for more than 28 years. He graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1971 and flew planes in the military, including with Fargo's Happy Hooligans, for 22 years.

“I am obligated under company procedures and FAA regulation not to operate an aircraft if I suspect it is unsafe,” McConnell, 57, states in his handwritten claim.

Janhunen dismisses the claim.

“We take every threat to airline security and safety very seriously,” he said. “In this case, we do not believe there's any shred of evidence that the allegations about these Boeing airplanes are true, and the case should be immediately dismissed.”

Many of McConnell's allegations are outlined in Internet postings on www.hawkscafe.com, which its creators say provide an analysis of the weapons and motives behind 9/11. The group claims to have more than 4 million members worldwide.

“I think this lawsuit is opening a Pandora's box,” McConnell said. “It will turn into a legal case that solves 9/11.”

He claims to know the true conspirators behind the 9/11 attacks and that radical Muslims served as a masquerade.

“If you want to know why I'm doing it, it is to make aviation safer,” McConnell said.

Boeing spokesman Tim Neale said each of its planes exceeds federal standards and undergoes rigorous certification before taking to the air.

“It's (safety) something we take very, very seriously,” Neale said. “There are no safety issues that go ignored. There's just too much at stake.”

Northwest Airlines denied comment. In the lawsuit, McConnell said the company and pilots union “have suggested that I am crazy.”

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of those working with the Web site, said McConnell, who previously filed for bankruptcy and seeks $4.5 million from Boeing and ALPA.

“I'm trying to retire early so I can do something more important than hauling 400 people to Hawaii,” said McConnell, who added that he wants to move to a warmer climate.

White House panel OKs surveillance plans

AP

WARRANTLESS EAVESDROPPING, FINANCIAL MONITORING UPHOLD RIGHTS, IT SAYS

WASHINGTON - A White House privacy board is giving its stamp of approval to two of the Bush administration's surveillance programs -- electronic eavesdropping and financial tracking -- and says they do not violate citizens' civil liberties.

Democrats newly in charge of Congress quickly criticized the findings, which they said were questionable given some of the board members' close ties with the Bush administration.

``Their current findings and any additional conclusions they reach will be taken with a grain of salt until they become fully independent,'' said Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., who chairs the House Homeland Security Committee.

Work in secrecy

After operating mostly in secret for a year, the five-member Privacy and Civil Liberties Board is preparing to release its first report to Congress next week.

The report finds that the National Security Agency's warrantless-eavesdropping program and the Treasury Department's monitoring of international banking transactions have sufficient privacy protections, three board members told the Associated Press in telephone interviews.

The programs have multiple layers of review before sensitive information is accessed, they said.

``We looked at the program, we visited NSA and met with the top people all the way down to those doing the hands-on work,'' said Carol Dinkins, a Houston attorney and former Reagan administration assistant attorney general who chairs the board.

``The program is structured and implemented in a way that is properly protective and attentive to civil liberties,'' she said.

Some board members were troubled by the Homeland Security Department's error-ridden no-fly lists, which critics say use subjective or inconclusive data to flag suspect travelers.

Anti-terror screening

One area the board will focus on in its report is the computerized anti-terrorism screening system recently announced by DHS and used for years without travelers' knowledge to assign risk assessments to millions of Americans who fly abroad.

``That's a place where there's a lot of opportunity for improvement,'' Dinkins said.

Lanny Davis, a former Clinton White House counsel and the lone Democrat on the panel, described the board's first report to Congress as modest. He said most of the work in the past year was spent being briefed on the administration's surveillance programs.

``We felt reassured regarding the checks-and-balance concerns,'' Davis said. He said that after several classified briefings, members were impressed by the multiple layers of review, which included audit trails to track whoever has access to the data.

Still, Davis said he anticipated the board will continue to monitor the program as needed.

The board's initial findings come as Congress is moving forward on measures to give the board more authority and make it more independent of the president. Created in late 2004, the panel was established as a compromise between Congress and the White House after a recommendation by the Sept. 11 commission.

Sick people used like laboratory rats in GM trials

independent news
Genetically modified potatoes developed by Monsanto, the multinational biotech company, have been fed to sick patients in an experiment. Rats that ate similar potatoes in the research suffered reductions in the weight of their hearts and prostate glands.

Dr Michael Antoniou, reader in molecular genetics at Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, said use of humans was "irresponsible and totally unethical, especially when already ill subjects were enrolled. These people truly were guinea pigs." Other scientists said the trials were too short, on too few people, to give meaningful results of long-term effects.

Monsanto said the vegetables were safe, and the researchers conducting the experiment said effects on the rats were within "permissible" limits.

The experiment is described in a hitherto unpublished report by the Nutrition Institute of the Russian Academy of Medical Science, done "by agreement with Monsanto Company" in 1998.

The report says "10 patients suffering from hypertensive disease and ischemic heart disease" were fed a pound of the Russet Burbank potatoes - modified to resist Colorado beetles - every day for three weeks, and monitored.

It goes on: "A certain risk of GM food products for human health does exist, as there can be by-effects of inserted genes besides the designed ones." The report describes the patients as "volunteers" and says they liked the GM potato so much they all "expressed their intention to consume it at home".

After comparing them with 10 other patients fed conventional potatoes, the report concludes: "The genetically modified potato provided by Monsanto did not reveal toxic, mutagenic, immune modulating and allergic effects within the examined parameters of the present experiment".

It recommended the GM potatoes "can be used for human nutrition purposes in further epidemiological research". The report says the rats, tested over six months, suffered "increases of kidneys' absolute weight" when compared to ones fed conventional potatoes but that all changes were "within permissible physiological fluctuation".

But Dr Irina Ermakova, of the Russian Academy of Science, calls the GM potatoes "dangerous" for rats, adding: "On this evidence, they cannot be used in the nourishment of people".

Tony Coombs from Monsanto UK said in a statement: "Potatoes genetically improved to prevent Colorado beetle destroying the crop have already been consumed, as safely as conventional or organic ones, in North America for years."

Timeline of Lewis 'Scooter' Libby Case

FOX NEWS
2003:

—Jan. 28: President Bush asserts in his State of the Union address: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

—May 6: New York Times columnist Nicholas D. Kristof reports that a former ambassador, whom he does not name, had been sent to Niger in 2002 to investigate the uranium report. The column says the ex-ambassador reported to the CIA and State Department well before Bush's speech that the uranium story was unequivocally wrong and was based on obviously forged documents.

—May 29: Libby asks Marc Grossman, an undersecretary of state, for information about the ambassador's travel to Niger. Grossman later tells Libby that Joseph Wilson was the former ambassador.

—June 11 or 12: Grossman tells Libby that Wilson's wife works at the CIA and that State Department personnel are saying Wilson's wife was involved in planning the trip. A senior CIA officer gives him similar information.

—June 12: Cheney advises Libby that Wilson's wife works at the CIA.

—June 14: Libby meets with a CIA briefer and discusses "Joe Wilson" and his wife, "Valerie Wilson."

—June 23: Libby meets with Times reporter Judith Miller. During the meeting he tells Miller that Wilson's wife might work at a bureau of the CIA.

—July 6: The Times publishes an opinion piece by Wilson titled "What I Didn't Find in Africa" and he appears on NBC's "Meet the Press." Wilson said he doubted Iraq had obtained uranium from Niger recently and thought Cheney's office was told of the results of his trip.

—July 7: Libby meets with then-White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer. Libby notes that Wilson's wife works at the CIA and that the information is not widely known.

—July 8: Libby meets with Miller again and tells her that he believes Wilson's wife works for the CIA.

—July 12: Libby speaks to Time magazine's Matthew Cooper and confirms to him that he has heard that Wilson's wife was involved in sending Wilson on the trip. Libby also speaks to Miller and discusses Wilson's wife and says that she works at the CIA.

—July 14: Syndicated columnist Robert Novak reports that Wilson's wife is a CIA operative on weapons of mass destruction and that two senior administration officials, whom Novak did not name, said she suggested sending her husband to Niger to investigate the uranium story.

—Sept. 26: A criminal investigation is authorized to determine who leaked Plame's identity to reporters. Disclosing the identity of CIA operatives is illegal.

—Oct. 14 and Nov. 26: Libby is interviewed by FBI agents.

—Dec. 30: U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald in Chicago, a tough and aggressive career prosecutor, is named to head the leak investigation after then-Attorney General John Ashcroft takes himself out of the case to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest.

2004:

—January: A grand jury begins investigating possible violations of federal criminal laws.

—March 5 and March 24: Libby testifies before the grand jury.

2005:

—Oct. 28: Libby is indicted on five counts: obstruction of justice and two counts each of false statement and perjury.

2006:

—Sept. 7: Former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage admits he leaked Plame's identity to Novak and to Bob Woodward of The Washington Post. Armitage says he did not realize Plame's job was covert. Woodward taped his June 13, 2003, interview with Armitage.

2007:

—Jan. 16: Libby's trial begins in U.S. District Court.

US Army hospital problems feared widespread

smh
PROBLEMS with the treatment of wounded soldiers that created a scandal at the top US military veterans' hospital are prevalent throughout the army's health-care system, legislators say.

The Vice-President, Dick Cheney, vowed to fix the substandard conditions at Walter Reed hospital, which have dealt yet another blow to an administration reeling from public anger over the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Two weeks after The Washington Post reported that soldiers at Walter Reed were recuperating in rodent-infested quarters and trapped in a bureaucratic limbo, army brass apologised at a US House of Representatives hearing on Monday.

John Tierney, a Democrat who chairs the House oversight and government reform committee's national security subcommittee, said the problems did not stop with the hospital in Washington.

"I also, unfortunately, feel that these problems go well beyond the walls of Walter Reed, and that they are problems systemic throughout the military health-care system," he said.

"Is this just another horrific consequence of the terrible planning that went into our invasion of Iraq?" In any case, he warned, the problems were now likely to get worse with the decision of the President, George Bush, to send more US troops to Iraq.

The Army Secretary, Francis Harvey, resigned last week over the scandal. The general in charge of the hospital, Major-General George Weightman, was replaced.

Mr Bush has ordered a wide-ranging review of all US veterans' facilities. Mr Cheney said on Monday that they wanted to "find out whether similar problems have occurred at other military and VA [Department of Veterans Affairs] hospitals."

The Washington Post revelations were particularly embarrassing in Washington because Mr Bush, senior Pentagon officials and legislators have often visited people in the hospital injured in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"These problems are not unique to Walter Reed," said Tom Davis, a Republican.

"The crushing complexity and glacial pace of outpatient procedures in medical evaluation boards are army-wide problems."

NATO launches offensive against Taliban

CHRON.COM
KABUL, Afghanistan — NATO-led troops launched their largest offensive yet against Taliban militants, focusing on the same southern region where U.S.-led forces carried out an even bigger operation less than a year ago.

Some 4,500 NATO troops and 1,000 Afghan soldiers were headed to volatile Helmand province, where hundreds militant fighters have amassed. They included some 1,500 U.S. troops.

NATO said Operation Achilles initially would focus on improving security, but that its "overarching purpose" was to enable the Afghan government to begin reconstruction and economic development of the region.

The offensive "is focused on improving security in areas where Taliban extremists, narco-traffickers and foreign terrorists are currently operating," said Col. Tom Collins, the spokesman for NATO's International Security Assistance Force. "Once the security situation is improved, we will begin short- and long-term reconstruction projects."

He was optimistic about their chances for success, even though they were returning to a region U.S.-led troops tried to subdue nine months ago in Mountain Thrust, an operation involving 11,000 troops, twice as many as in the current offensive.

The situation was "fundamentally different" this year, Collins said, adding that NATO had a much better opportunity to succeed because there were now more troops in the country overall.

British, Canadian, Dutch and Afghan forces are also taking part in the offensive, which began Monday and will focus on a northern section of the province.

An ISAF statement said that one soldier died Tuesday in the south during combat operations, but it gave no further details about the soldier's death or where it happened. Collins said he didn't know if the death was due to the new operation.

Also Tuesday, the British Embassy was looking into reports that a British man has been kidnapped in southern Afghanistan, an official said. A Taliban spokesman claimed the hardline militia had detained the Briton — whom he did not name but said had claimed to be a journalist — and two Afghans as they traveled together by vehicle Monday in Helmand province.

Afghan officials had no immediate information on the reported kidnapping.

The government has little control over many parts of northern Helmand, and the British troops stationed there fight almost daily battles with militants. U.S. intelligence officials say Taliban fighters have flooded into Helmand the last several months, and that there are now more fighters there than any other part of the country.

The militants overran Musa Qala, in northern Helmand province, on Feb. 1 after defying a peace deal between the government and elders reached last fall that capped weeks of fighting. The Taliban still control the town more than a month after the initial attack. Collins said forces would not move into the village until given approval by the government.

British troops have also been battling militants in the nearby district of Kajaki to enable repair work on a hydroelectric damn there, which supplies close to 2 million Afghans with electricity.

"Strategically, our goal is to enable the Afghan government to begin the Kajaki project," said Maj. Gen. Ton van Loon, ISAF's southern commander. "This long-term initiative is a huge undertaking and the eventual rehabilitation of the Kajaki multipurpose dam and power house will improve the water supply for local communities, rehabilitate irrigation systems for farmlands and provide sufficient electrical power for residents, industries and commerce," he said.

Helmand is the world's biggest producer of opium, and a new U.N. drug assessment indicates this year's poppy harvest could be higher than last year's record output. The U.N. says Taliban fighters protect poppy farmers and tax the crop, deriving much-needed income for their insurgency.

Meanwhile, a remote-control bomb targeting a police vehicle on Tuesday killed one policeman and wounded another in Murja district, also in Helmand, said Ghulam Nabi Mulakhail, the province's police chief.

The blast also wounded six Afghan civilians nearby, said Abdul Basir, a police officer in the district.

Monday, March 05, 2007

BBC NEWS | Europe | Litvinenko supporter shot in US

BBC NEWS | Europe | Litvinenko supporter shot in US

Litvinenko supporter shot in US
The FBI and US police are investigating the shooting of a Russian intelligence analyst, days after he said Moscow was involved in a former KGB agent's death.

Paul Joyal, 53, was shot several times as he returned to his home in the suburbs of Washington DC on Thursday.

Reports say Mr Joyal, an American, had items stolen in an attack that appeared to be a random robbery.

But the timing has raised concern that he was targeted for expressing his views on the Alexander Litvinenko case.

Mr Litvinenko, a critic of Russian President Vladimir Putin and the Russian security services, died in November in London after being poisoned by radioactive substance polonium-210.

He and his associates accused Russia of carrying out the poisoning because of his fierce opposition to Mr Putin, who has denied any involvement.

Hospital officials said Mr Joyal was in a critical condition.

'We will silence you'

Four days before he was shot, Mr Joyal told NBC's Dateline television programme that he had struck up a friendship with the former agent during trips to London.

In his interview, Mr Joyal said: "A message has been communicated to anyone who wants to speak out against the Kremlin - 'if you do, no matter who you are, where you are, we will find you and we will silence you - in the most horrible way possible'."

The FBI told the BBC that it was helping the Prince George's County police department in the investigation, but had not opened its own inquiry.

Mr Joyal - a former police officer - runs a consultancy specialising in intelligence information for companies wishing to invest in the former Soviet republics.

Mr Litvinenko was granted asylum in the UK in 2000.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/europe/6418977.stm

Published: 2007/03/05 11:32:25 GMT

BBC NEWS | Middle East | Report warns against Iran attack

BBC NEWS | Middle East | Report warns against Iran attack

Report warns against Iran attack
Military strikes against Iran could speed Tehran's development of nuclear weapons, according to a UK think tank.

A report by the Oxford Research Group says military action could lead Iran to change the nature of its programme and quickly build a few nuclear arms.

Iran denies Western claims it is trying to build weapons, saying its nuclear programme is entirely peaceful.

The study comes as the UN nuclear watchdog is set to discuss the nuclear programmes of Iran and North Korea.

In February, Iran ignored a deadline set by the UN Security Council to stop enriching uranium.

A report by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said Iran was instead expanding the programme.

Far from setting back Iran's nuclear programme , a military attack might create the political conditions in which Iran could accelerate its nuclear weapons programme
Oxford Research Group report

Enriched uranium is used as fuel for nuclear reactors, but highly enriched uranium can be used to make nuclear bombs.

Western powers have threatened to expand sanctions on Iran. These could include travel bans on Iranian officials associated with nuclear and missile programmes.

The US has not ruled out using force but says it wants to give diplomacy a chance.

'Fast-track programme'

The Oxford Research Group report is written by nuclear scientist and arms expert Frank Barnaby.

"If Iran is moving towards a nuclear weapons capacity it is doing so relatively slowly, most estimates put it at least five years away," he says.


POSSIBLE NEXT STEPS
New UN resolution on tougher economic sanctions, tabled by US or European allies
US pressure on Europeans to step up bilateral sanctions
New initiative to get Iran back to talks

Mr Barnaby adds that an attack on Iranian nuclear facilities "would almost certainly lead to a fast-track programme to develop a small number of nuclear devices as quickly as possible".

He says it "would be a bit like deciding to build a car from spare parts instead of building the entire car factory".

The BBC's diplomatic correspondent Jonathan Marcus says that with two US navy aircraft carrier strike groups in the Gulf region and US spokesmen refusing to rule out force, this study is timely and highlights what most air power experts have been saying for some time.

IAEA meeting

An operation to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities would be neither brief nor limited in scope, our correspondent says. Multiple targets would have to be hit, and the outcome would be far from clear, especially if Iran has hidden facilities unknown to US intelligence.

But he points out that this is not a military study - written by a noted atomic scientist and peace campaigner, it looks more at the aftermath of a potential US attack and questions the central rationale for any military operation.

On Monday the IAEA board of governors is due to discuss both Iran and North Korea.

The BBC's Bethany Bell in Vienna says that while there is little progress on the Iranian nuclear file there has been movement on North Korea.

Last month Pyongyang agreed to take the first steps towards nuclear disarmament, as part of a deal reached during talks in Beijing.

Under the agreement, North Korea promised to shut down its main nuclear reactor in return for fuel aid.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/6418049.stm

Published: 2007/03/05 00:05:23 GMT

© BBC MMVII

BBC NEWS | South Asia | US 'erased Afghan attack footage'

BBC NEWS | South Asia | US 'erased Afghan attack footage'

US 'erased Afghan attack footage'
The Associated Press is to complain to the US military after journalists said US soldiers deleted footage of the aftermath of an attack in Afghanistan.

President Hamid Karzai said 10 people died when coalition forces opened fire on civilians after a suicide attack in eastern Nangarhar province on Sunday.

Journalists working for AP said US troops erased images of a vehicle in which three people had been shot dead.

The US military said it could not confirm its troops had seized any film.

'Co-ordinated attack'

The Americans say the fighting started when a convoy of marines was attacked by a suicide bomber and came under co-ordinated small-arms fire.

Two soldiers with a translator came and said, 'Why are you taking pictures? You don't have permission'
Photographer Rahmat Gul

They say their soldiers returned fire, and acknowledge that at least eight Afghan civilians were killed, with a further 35 injured.

Thousands of local people took to the streets on Sunday to protest against what happened. The Afghan authorities have launched an investigation into the circumstances of the militant attack.

'You will face problems'

In a report from Kabul, the Associated Press (AP) said it "plans to lodge a protest with the American military".

A freelance photographer working for AP and a cameraman working for AP Television News say they arrived at the site about half an hour after the suicide bombing.

Witnesses at the scene said three civilians in the four-wheel drive vehicle had been killed by US forces fleeing the attack, the journalists said.

"When I went near the four-wheel drive, I saw the Americans taking pictures of the same car, so I started taking pictures," photographer Rahmat Gul said.

"Two soldiers with a translator came and said, 'Why are you taking pictures? You don't have permission.'"

Mr Gul said troops took his camera, deleted his photos and returned it to him.

His APTN colleague, who did not want to be named, said he was told he could film the scene - but when he did so a US soldier got very angry and deleted any footage that included the Americans.

Khanwali Kamran, a reporter for the Afghan channel Ariana Television, said the American soldiers also deleted his footage, AP reported.

"They warned me that if it is aired ... then, 'You will face problems,'" Mr Kamran was quoted by the news agency as saying.

Reporters Without Borders condemned the alleged actions of the US forces, saying they dealt with the media poorly.

"Why did the soldiers do it if they don't have anything to hide?" said Jean-Francois Julliard, a spokesman for the Paris-based group.

US military spokesman Lt Col David Accetta said he did not have any confirmed reports that coalition forces "have been involved in confiscating cameras or deleting images".
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/south_asia/6419235.stm

Published: 2007/03/05 12:20:22 GMT

© BBC MMVII

Sunday, March 04, 2007

Paulson Says Foreign Treasuries Holdings Not Threat

March 4 (Bloomberg) -- Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said foreign holdings of U.S. government debt pose no threat to the economy, countering comments made by leading Democrats including Senator Hillary Clinton.

``It's a positive that foreign investors want to own our Treasuries,'' Paulson said in an interview with ABC News today. ``Interest rates are lower -- it's helping our economic growth in this country.''

Paulson reiterated that the U.S. economy is ``healthy'' and downplayed last week's slump in stocks, the biggest in four years. Financial markets don't move ``in any direction in a straight line forever,'' he said. ``And so I look at it and put it in perspective and say, over the last year, the Dow's up almost 11 percent, the S&P's up 9 percent, and I'll take it.''

Clinton, a New York senator running for the Democratic nomination for president, said last week the global market sell- off was a ``wake-up call'' for addressing international holdings of Treasuries. Representative Charles Rangel, a New York Democrat who chairs the House Ways and Means Committee, said ``the slide shows that we are vulnerable.''

Treasuries posted their biggest weekly rally since September last week as investors sought a haven from the decline in shares. Yields on benchmark 10-year notes dropped 17 basis points, or 0.17 percentage point, to 4.50 percent. The Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 4.2 percent to close at 12114.10 on March 2. The Standard & Poor's 500 index slumped 4.4 percent to 1387.17.

International Holdings

Investors abroad hold more than half of the $4.3 trillion of debt outstanding. China is the second-largest owner after Japan, with $349.6 billion in December, Treasury data show. The slump in American stocks last week was spurred in part by the biggest slump in Chinese shares in a decade, traders said.

``The move suggests that the money we owe to China is not a healthy thing,'' Rangel said in an interview on Fox television earlier today.

Clinton wrote a letter last week to Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke saying the amount of U.S. debt held by investors abroad was a ``source of vulnerability'' for the economy. ``We can too easily be held hostage to the economic decisions being made in Beijing, Shanghai and Tokyo,'' she wrote.

Both Paulson and Bernanke have repeatedly told lawmakers in hearings this year that foreign holdings of Treasuries are a statement of confidence in the American economy.

Paulson, the former head of Goldman Sachs Group Inc., said that the $1 trillion of U.S. debt held by China and Japan amounts to just two days of trading in Treasuries.

Bernanke's View

Bernanke said in a hearing at the House Budget Committee Feb. 28 that it wasn't in the interest of foreigners to dump their Treasuries. A sell-off ``would be disruptive in the debt markets in the short run. It would cause, for example, an increase in interest rates.''

``In the longer term, the effects would be somewhat less,'' Bernanke said. ``It should be noted that the Federal Reserve could be of assistance in that situation if interest rates went up and slowed U.S. economic growth. For example, the Federal Reserve could respond by using monetary policy, and that would have some benefits.''

Paulson today reiterated his view that the U.S. economic outlook is unshaken by the decline in stocks. ``The consumer's strong,'' he said. Exports are ``adding to our growth'' and ``inflation appears to be contained.''

The Treasury chief conducted the interview before his departure for a trip to Japan, South Korea and China. Paulson is seeking to persuade China to reduce its reliance on exports for growth. Lawmakers from both parties say the nation artificially holds down its exchange rate to spur exports and charge China with violating intellectual property rights.

Resist Protectionism

Paulson said that while the U.S. should continue to pressure China, the country should resist protectionism. ``Being open to trade and foreign investment has been one of the pillars -- and competition that's made this economy great.''

In his interview today, Rangel warned that patience was running thin on Capitol Hill with China. ``Congress, Democrats and Republicans are going to start to get tough with China.'' He said that China needed to move more quickly to improve mechanisms to protect intellectual property.

Saturday, March 03, 2007

Fed must pay ‘greater attention’ to global forces

The Financial Times
Increasing integration of financial markets means the Federal Reserve has to pay much greater attention to global forces when setting monetary policy, Ben Bernanke said late on Friday.

The Federal Reserve chairman focused on long-range issues, and did not refer to recent market turmoil or make any comments on the state of the US economy.

Mr Bernanke said international factors, such as the so-called “global savings glut” played an increasingly prominent role in determining long-term interest rates in the US, and helped explain why rates have remained low in recent years.

To understand and evaluate conditions in the bond market, he said, “the Fed must take into account the various effects of foreign capital flows on US yields and asset prices, a task that can be quite challenging.”

But Mr Bernanke insisted the Federal Reserve has not lost control of the key levers it needs to shape monetary conditions in the US economy.

He said the Fed still has direct control over short-term interest rates, and retains considerable influence over long-term rates as well through its ability to shape expectations of where short term rates will be in the future.

Indeed, Mr Bernanke said empirical evidence suggests US monetary policy has greater influence on monetary conditions abroad than the other way around.

The Fed chairman also discussed the relationship between globalisation and inflation, concluding that while global factors “do seem to influence inflation” the net effect in recent years was not obviously to reduce the rate of price increases.

“When the offsetting effects of globalisation on the prices of manufactured imports and on energy and commodity prices are considered together there seems to be little basis for concluding that globalisation overall has significantly reduced inflation in the US in recent years,” he said.

“Indeed the opposite may be true.”

Mr Bernanke said the idea that US inflation was influenced by the global balance of supply and demand, as well as the domestic balance, was “intriguing” but that the evidence so far was “inconclusive.”

Bernanke Trying To Fill Greenspan's Shoes

How Did Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke Do During Wall Street Scare?

cbs
When Wall Street went on a wild ride this week and stocks started to plummet, with just a few words, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke was able to calm our fears.

“There is really no material change in our expectations for the U.S. economy," he said.

Tapped by President Bush to take over as fed chairman just over a year ago, Bernanke succeeded a man who spent 18 years on the job.

"Ben will replace a legend, Alan Greenspan,” said President Bush back when he appointed Bernanke. "He has dominated his age like no central banker in history."

And despite Bernanke's credentials as a Princeton professor and Fed Governor, many business leaders were concerned about the transition.

"No one is irreplaceable,” said Jack Welch, former CEO of General Electric, back in January of 2006. “But Alan Greenspan will leave a big hole that this guy will have to work like hell to fill."

Ironically, it was Greenspan's own words this week that helped add fuel to the market's fire, when he warned that the U.S. economy could be headed toward a recession.

"Greenspan is worth reporting, even if he wasn't the former Fed chairman he'd be worth reporting because he's very smart and understands the economy," says Irwin Stelzer, director of economic policy studies at the Hudson Institute.

Quietly, Bernanke has tried to put his own imprint on the economy and the Federal Reserve. But his tenure got off to a shaky start when he made an off-hand remark about interest rates, which sent stocks plummeting.

"So he made a few gaffes but basically he is a very smart guy," says Stelzer.

And Wall Street generally gives him high marks for keeping the economy on track even as it slows down. There are still challenges ahead. New home sales fell more than 16 percent in January, the steepest monthly drop in 13 years.

“I think we'll look back in history ... at an environment where Bernanke probably became as important and as noted as Alan Greenspan,” says Liz Ann Sonders, chief investment strategist, at Charles Schwab.

If Bernanke is able to manage the slowdown he'll begin to move out of Greenspan's shadow.

Friday, March 02, 2007

The War on Terror Is the Leading Cause of Terrorism

alternet

Innocent people across the world are now paying the price of the "Iraq effect," with the loss of hundreds of lives directly linked to the invasion and occupation by American and British forces.

An authoritative U.S. study of terrorist attacks after the invasion in 2003 contradicts the repeated denials of George Bush and Tony Blair that the war is not to blame for an upsurge in fundamentalist violence worldwide. The research is said to be the first to attempt to measure the "Iraq effect" on global terrorism.

It found that the number killed in jihadist attacks around the world has risen dramatically since the Iraq war began in March 2003. The study compared the period between 11 September 2001 and the invasion of Iraq with the period since the invasion. The count -- excluding the Arab-Israel conflict -- shows the number of deaths due to terrorism rose from 729 to 5,420. As well as strikes in Europe, attacks have also increased in Chechnya and Kashmir since the invasion. The research was carried out by the Centre on Law and Security at the NYU Foundation for Mother Jones magazine.

Iraq was the catalyst for a ferocious fundamentalist backlash, according to the study, which says that the number of those killed by Islamists within Iraq rose from seven to 3,122. Afghanistan, invaded by US and British forces in direct response to the September 11 attacks, saw a rise from very few before 2003 to 802 since then. In the Chechen conflict, the toll rose from 234 to 497. In the Kashmir region, as well as India and Pakistan, the total rose from 182 to 489, and in Europe from none to 297.

Two years after declaring "mission accomplished" in Iraq President Bush insisted: "If we were not fighting and destroying the enemy in Iraq, they would not be idle. They would be plotting and killing Americans across the world and within our borders. By fighting these terrorists in Iraq, Americans in uniform are defeating a direct threat to the American people."

Mr Blair has also maintained that the Iraq war has not been responsible for Muslim fundamentalist attacks such as the 7/7 London bombings which killed 52 people. "Iraq, the region and the wider world is a safer place without Saddam [Hussein]," Mr Blair declared in July 2004.

Announcing the deployment of 1,400 extra troops to Afghanistan earlier this week -- raising the British force level in the country above that in Iraq -- the Prime Minister steadfastly denied accusations by MPs that there was any link between the Iraq war an unravelling of security elsewhere.

Last month John Negroponte, the Director of National Intelligence in Washington, said he was "not certain" that the Iraq war had been a recruiting factor for al-Qa'ida and insisted: "I wouldn't say that there has been a widespread growth in Islamic extremism beyond Iraq, I really wouldn't."

Yet the report points out that the US administration's own National Intelligence Estimate on "Trends in Global Terrorism: Implications for the United States" -- partially declassified last October -- stated that " the Iraq war has become the 'cause célèbre' for jihadists ... and is shaping a new generation of terrorist leaders and operatives."

The new study, by Peter Bergen and Paul Cruickshank, argues that, on the contrary, "the Iraq conflict has greatly increased the spread of al-Qa'ida ideological virus, as shown by a rising number of terrorist attacks in the past three years from London to Kabul, and from Madrid to the Red Sea.

"Our study shows that the Iraq war has generated a stunning increase in the yearly rate of fatal jihadist attacks, amounting to literally hundreds of additional terrorist attacks and civilian lives lost. Even when terrorism in Iraq and Afghanistan is excluded, fatal attacks in the rest of the world have increased by more than one third."

In trying to gauge the "Iraq effect," the authors had focused on the rate of terrorist attacks in two periods -- from September 2001 to 30 March 2003 (the day of the Iraq invasion) and 21 March 2003 to 30 September 2006. The research has been based on the MIPT-RAND Terrorism database.

The report's assertion that the Iraq invasion has had a far greater impact in radicalising Muslims is widely backed security personnel in the UK. Senior anti-terrorist officials told The Independent that the attack on Iraq, and the now-discredited claims by the U.S. and British governments about Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction, had led to far more young Muslims engaging in extremist activity than the invasion of Afghanistan two years previously.

Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller, head of the Secret Service (MI5) said recently: "In Iraq attacks are regularly videoed and the footage is downloaded into the internet.

"Chillingly, we see the results here. Young teenagers are being groomed to be suicide bombers. The threat is serious, is growing and will, I believe, be with us for a generation."

In Afghanistan the most active of the Taliban commanders, Mullah Dadullah, acknowledged how the Iraq war has influenced the struggle in Afghanistan.

"We give and take with the mujahedin in Afghanistan," he said. The most striking example of this has been the dramatic rise in suicide bombings in Afghanistan, a phenomenon not seen through the 10 years of war with the Russians in the 1980s.

The effect of Iraq on various jihadist conflicts has been influenced according to a number of factors, said the report. Countries with troops in Iraq, geographical proximity to the country, the empathy felt for the Iraqis and the exchange of information between Islamist groups. "This may explain why jihadist groups in Europe, Arab countries, and Afghanistan were more affected by the Iraq war than other regions," it said.

Russia, like the US, has used the language of the "war on terror" in its actions in Chechnya, and al-Qa'ida and their associates have entrenched themselves in the border areas of Pakistan from where they have mounted attacks in Kashmir, Pakistan and India.

Statistics for the Arab-Israel conflict also show an increase, but the methodology is disputed in the case of Palestinian attacks in the occupied territories and settler attacks on Palestinians.

* The U.S. is joining the Iraqi government in a diplomatic initiative inviting Iran and Syria to a "neighbours meeting" on stabilising Iraq, the Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said yesterday. The move reflects a change of approach by the Bush administration, which previously had resisted calls to include Iran and Syria in such talks.

China expands sub fleet


washington times

China's military is engaged in a major buildup of submarines that includes five new strategic nuclear-missile boats and several advanced nuclear-powered attack submarines, according to the Office of Naval Intelligence.

The new nuclear-powered missile submarines (SSBNs), identified as Type 094s, will be outfitted with new 5,000-mile range JL-2 missiles that "will provide China with a modern and robust sea-based nuclear deterrent force," the ONI stated in report made up of written answers to questions on the Chinese submarine buildup.

The ONI report was first disclosed to Sea Power magazine, and a copy was obtained by The Washington Times. It was the first time the Pentagon has identified the number of new Chinese strategic submarines under construction.

The five new missile submarines will "provide more redundancy and capacity for a near-continuous at-sea SSBN presence," the ONI said, which noted that sea trials for some of the submarines are under way and the first deployments could begin as early as next year.

The buildup is raising new concerns among senior Pentagon planners already worried by Beijing's broader strategic nuclear-forces buildup, which also includes several new long-range land-based nuclear missiles and a land-attack cruise missile similar to the Tomahawk.

"This is a troubling development," Richard Fisher, a specialist on the Chinese military with the private International Assessment and Strategy Center, said of the submarine buildup.

The five missile submarines, each equipped with 12 JL-2 missiles, shows that China is working to achieve a force of 120 long-range nuclear missiles over the next decade, about half of them to be carried on the submarines, Mr. Fisher said. The other half would be the 60 land-based DF-31 missiles that current deployment rates will give China by then, he said.

The 120 missiles also could have multiple-warheads, since China is known to have acquired all the needed technology from the U.S. during the 1990s.

Retired Vice Adm. Michael McConnell, commenting at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Tuesday, said China's nuclear missiles pose a threat.

"It's a matter of they're building their military, in my view, to reach some state of parity with the United States," said Mr. McConnell, the new director of national intelligence. "So they're a threat today, they would become an increasing threat over time."

Little is known about China's nuclear forces and efforts by Pentagon officials to engage Chinese military leaders about their strategic weapons and forces has not been successful. China's government has insisted its current modernization is part of a peaceful development, but the contrasting strategic nuclear-forces buildup is worrying, defense officials said.

Chinese Gen. Zhu Chenghu told reporters in 2005 that China would attack U.S. cities with nuclear weapons in response to any conventionally armed U.S. missile strikes against China during a conflict over Taiwan. Years earlier, Gen. Xiong Guangkai threatened to use nuclear weapons against Los Angeles if the U.S. helped Taiwan defend against a Chinese invasion of the island.

The missile-submarine buildup would provide Beijing with a major upgrade on current capabilities. In 1983, China built one Xia-class nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine, reportedly with 12 1,000-mile range JL-1 missiles. But that solitary submarine has only twice test-fired its missiles and never ventured beyond China's regional waters.

"Although the range of the JL-1 limits the Xia's utility as a deterrent platform, targets throughout the region, including U.S. military facilities, could be targeted with the JL-1 from launch points inside traditional Chinese navy operating areas," the ONI said.

On China's new attack submarine, the ONI stated that China already has launched and is performing sea trials on an unspecified number of Type 093 nuclear-powered attack submarines. Published reports in China have said two Type 093 attack submarines are deployed and use "foreign technologies" and advanced anti-ship missiles and torpedoes.

The new advances are part of China's efforts to bolster its anti-ship weapons to permit strikes at greater ranges from the Chinese coast than its current diesel-powered submarine force offers, the ONI said. China currently is upgrading its current force of about 55 attack submarines -- most of them easy-to-track diesel boats -- with more-advanced and harder-to-track vessels, including Russian-made Kilos, and its own Song- and Yuan-class submarines.

"Each of these submarine classes, which are quiet platforms with anti-ship cruise missiles, is an integral part of China's regional anti-access strategy," ONI said. "The quieting incorporated into these submarines is required for successful operations in the open ocean operating areas which could facilitate the [Chinese navy's] wartime mission of keeping enemy combatants outside of strike range of the theater of operation."

A Song-class submarine surfaced undetected within five miles, well within firing range, of the aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk in October.

The ONI stated that China's maritime strategy is focused on blocking U.S. or Japanese intervention in a future conflict over Taiwan. To that end, Beijing has begun equipping its medium- and short-range ballistic missiles based on shore, hundreds of which are deployed across the Taiwan Strait from the island that the communist regime views as a renegade province, with maneuvering warheads.

These radar-guided or heat-seeking weapons "provide the accuracy necessary to attack a ship at sea," ONI said.

But China's rise in international trade and commerce, plus its growing dependence on imported foreign oil, also has expanded Beijing's maritime strategy from a mostly submarine force to one of building surface ships to "defend sea lines of communication" (SLOCs), because protecting sea-lanes with submarines is difficult.

ONI also said that in addition to new destroyers, "by 2020, China is likely to operate an aircraft carrier, the initial unit of which may be the refurbished ex-Varyag, acquired from Ukraine in 2000, to further support SLOC protection."

General Is Fired Over Conditions at Walter Reed

nytimes
WASHINGTON, March 1 — The two-star general in charge of Walter Reed Army Medical Center was relieved of command on Thursday, following disclosures that wounded soldiers being treated as outpatients there were living in dilapidated quarters and enduring long waits for treatment.

The officer, Maj. Gen. George W. Weightman, a physician and a graduate of West Point, was fired because Army Secretary Francis J. Harvey “had lost trust and confidence” in his ability to make improvements in outpatient care at Walter Reed, the Army said in a brief statement.

The revelations about conditions at the hospital, one of the Army’s best-known and busiest centers for soldiers wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan, have embarrassed the Army and prompted two investigations, several Congressional inquiries and a rush to clean up the accommodations for outpatients, where residents lived with moldy walls, stained carpets and other problems.

A series of disclosures published prominently in The Washington Post about the living conditions, the red tape ensnarling treatment and other serious problems have challenged the notion promoted for years by the Army, especially since the war in Iraq, that wounded soldiers receive unparalleled care at Walter Reed.

Army officials have defended the treatment provided to most patients at Walter Reed, especially the most serious cases, those admitted to inpatient wards on the hospital’s campus a few miles from the center of Washington.

But they have acknowledged that the large number of wounded from Iraq and Afghanistan, currently around 650 patients, has taxed doctors, nurses and other care providers and forced them to rely more heavily on overflow facilities to house outpatients who must remain near the hospital for treatment.

Officials refused to provide the specific reasons for General Weightman’s firing.

The Army has admitted in recent weeks that the system it uses to decide whether wounded soldiers who have been moved to outpatient status will be able to return to active duty often takes too long and has promised to change the system. At Walter Reed the process has taken an average of over 200 days, a source of frustration to soldiers and families who are awaiting decisions about what benefits they will receive if they retire.

Treatment of wounded soldiers has also been spotlighted recently in a documentary recounting the treatment received by the ABC News anchorman Bob Woodruff, who was wounded in Iraq last year. Mr. Woodruff contrasted his care with that of soldiers, finding that Veterans Administration regional medical centers provide retired soldiers with good care but that local V.A. hospitals are less skilled at dealing with complex problems like traumatic brain injuries.

Mr. Harvey told reporters Thursday that the Army was also examining conditions at other medical facilities, both in the United States and abroad. “We’ll fix as we find things wrong,” he said.

Paralleling the Army effort, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates appointed a panel last week to examine conditions at Walter Reed and other Defense Department hospitals it chooses, including the Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Md.

Mr. Gates endorsed the decision to relieve General Weightman in a statement Thursday.

“The care and welfare of our wounded men and women in uniform demand the highest standard of excellence and commitment that we can muster as a government,” he said. “When this standard is not met, I will insist on swift and direct corrective action and, where appropriate, accountability up the chain of command.”

Mr. Gates had signaled earlier, after a visit to Walter Reed, that senior officials would probably be relieved of command.

A Pentagon official said that, in addition to General Weightman, a captain, two noncommissioned officers, and an enlisted soldier involved in outpatient treatment were being reassigned. He said he could not provide further information because of Defense Department confidentiality rules.

General Weightman assumed command of the North Atlantic Regional Medical Command and Walter Reed Army Medical Center on August 25, 2006. He oversees medical facilities in seven other states in addition to Walter Reed and is one of the most senior officers to be relieved in connection with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. He could not be reached for comment.

The Army said that command of Walter Reed would be taken over temporarily by Lt. Gen. Kevin Kiley, the Army’s top medical officer.

A 1973 graduate of the United States Military Academy, General Kiley received a medical degree in 1982 from the University of Vermont and has held a series of medical commands in the past two decades, including “land component command surgeon” during the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

In comments to reporters on Feb. 16, just before the first of a series of articles was published by The Post, General Weightman conceded that there were problems with outpatient care at Walter Reed, but said that improvements were being made.

“The family members get a little frustrated because, I mean, we are really disrupting their lives,” The Associated Press quoted him as saying.

In the last year, General Weightman said, Walter Reed had increased to 17 from 4 the number of caseworkers charged with helping outpatients with the paperwork and other requirements of the patient disability evaluation system, which determines whether soldiers can remain in the military or retire with full benefits.

He said that the process often took months or years at Walter Reed because the hospital handled some of the most complex medical cases, involving head trauma and other conditions that made gauging recovery difficult.

Outpatients at Walter Reed have received initial treatment but require further care or rehabilitation before retiring from the armed forces or returning to active duty.

Addressing reports that recovering soldiers were asked to attend daily inspection, even when under medication, Paul Boyce, an Army spokesman, said that there would be periodic inspections in the outpatient facilities. Mr. Boyce added that soldiers who are able were asked to attend a daily morning meeting where treatment options and other information were discussed but that the sessions were not inspections.

Mr. Boyce said the worst conditions in the outpatient residences had been corrected but added the Army was planning to make more repairs, like replacing a faulty heating and air-conditioning system that was the cause of the mold on the walls.

Jesuits "certain" about superior's exit in '08

theindiancatholic
ROME (Zenit.org): A spokesman for the Society of Jesus said it is "morally certain" that the upcoming general congregation will formally approve Father Peter-Hans Kolvenbach's request to step down as superior general.

Father Kolvenbach received Benedict XVI's approval for his proposed resignation next year, though the Jesuit Constitution stipulates that the superior-general position is for life.

The Dutch-born Father Kolvenbach cited his age -- he will turn 80 in 2008 -- and his 25-year tenure as the superior of the Jesuits as reasons for his resignation.

In the wake of recent media reports, Father José de Vera, director of the Jesuits' information office, clarified the situation.

"A few months ago Father Kolvenbach obtained the Pope's permission to present his resignation," Father de Vera explained in a statement sent to ZENIT. "He will do so in the next general congregation which he has convoked for January 2008."

"Theoretically the congregation could reject the proposal of resignation presented by Father Kolvenbach," the Jesuit spokesman said. "Resignation from the office of superior general has no effect if it is not agreed to by the Society in general congregation.

"[P]ractically speaking, this will not happen because the superior-general has followed to the letter the process established for the case of resignation."

The Society of Jesus had recently asked the Pope if the organization's rule that superiors-general have a life term in their office should continue in force.

According to Father de Vera, the Holy Father chose to maintain the stipulation. This does not discard the possibility, the Jesuit added, that, "in special cases and after previous consultation with the Pope," the superior general "can present his resignation to the general congregation."

Thursday, March 01, 2007

U.S. won’t extradite CIA agents to Italy - International Terrorism - MSNBC.com

U.S. won’t extradite CIA agents to Italy - International Terrorism - MSNBC.com

U.S. won’t extradite CIA agents to Italy
Remarks come ahead of first criminal trial over U.S. ‘renditions’ program
Reuters
Updated: 10:09 p.m. ET Feb 28, 2007
BRUSSELS, Belgium - The United States will reject any request by Italy to extradite CIA agents for the first criminal trial over controversial U.S. "renditions" of terror suspects, a U.S. government lawyer said on Wednesday.

A Milan judge earlier this month ordered 26 Americans, most of them thought to be CIA agents, to stand trial with Italian spies for kidnapping a Muslim cleric and flying him to Egypt, where he says he was tortured.

"We've not got an extradition request from Italy.... If we got an extradition request from Italy, we would not extradite U.S. officials to Italy," U.S. State Department legal adviser John Bellinger told a news briefing.

Bellinger, in Brussels for meetings with European legal advisers, did not comment on details of the case but said the United States would never hand over a suspect to another country without assurances about their treatment.

He acknowledged widespread concern in Europe about the tactics of the Bush administration in what it calls the "war on terror" but said the risk of legal action against U.S. officials in Europe was harming intelligence cooperation.

"The continuing threat of criminal charges not only harms cooperation on our end but does also cast a pall over cooperation on the European side as well," he said.

"We get assurances from countries that individuals will be properly treated and if we can't get these assurances then we will not turn people over to those countries," he added.

Bellinger's remarks were no surprise and meant the indictees would probably stand trial in absentia on June 8.

Among those indicted for the 2003 abduction are Jeff Castelli, former CIA chief in Rome, former CIA Milan station chief Robert Lady and a former head of Italy's SISMI military intelligence agency, Nicolo Pollari.

Terror suspect allegedly taken, beaten
Prosecutors say a CIA-led team, with SISMI's help, grabbed terrorism suspect Hassan Mustafa Osama Nasr, also known as Abu Omar, off a Milan street in February 2003, bundled him into a van and drove him to a military base in northern Italy.

Prosecutors allege the CIA flew him from there via Germany to Egypt, where he says he was tortured with electric shocks, beatings, rape threats and genital abuse.


Persistent criticism by European rights groups and lawmakers of U.S. anti-terror tactics and the alleged acquiescence of European governments has long troubled officials on both sides of the Atlantic.

A court in Munich issued arrest warrants last month for 13 suspected CIA agents accused of kidnapping a German of Lebanese descent and flying him to a jail in Afghanistan, where he too says he was tortured.

German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier, a senior aide to former Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, has also faced a barrage of criticism over charges that he blocked the release of a German-born Turkish man held in Guantanamo Bay prison.

A European Parliament report published this month said that renditions were illegal and had taken place with the collusion of a number of European governments and their secret services.

Bellinger rejected the report as an "unbalanced, inaccurate and unfair" interpretation of acceptable and important intelligence cooperation.

Copyright 2007 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.(c) Reuters 2007. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17390413/

Pakistan denies U.S. claim on bin Laden - South and Central Asia - MSNBC.com

Pakistan denies U.S. claim on bin Laden - South and Central Asia - MSNBC.com

Pakistan denies U.S. claim on bin Laden
U.S. has not backed up claim with evidence, interior minister says
The Associated Press
Updated: 11:30 a.m. ET Feb 28, 2007
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - Pakistan on Wednesday rejected a claim by the U.S. intelligence chief that Osama bin Laden and his deputy were hiding in northwestern Pakistan, and that al-Qaida was setting up camps near the Afghan border.

Interior Minister Aftab Khan Sherpao told The Associated Press there were no al-Qaida training camps in his country and U.S. officials had not provided any intelligence suggesting there were.

"We will act on any such intelligence, but so far they have not" provided any, he said.

Sherpao's comments came a day after Mike McConnell, the new U.S. intelligence chief, told the Senate Armed Services Committee that al-Qaida was trying to set up operations in largely ungoverned parts of Pakistan's northwest, along Afghanistan's eastern border.

"It's something we're very worried about and very concerned about," McConnell said. U.S. intelligence officials believe that bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri, were trying to establish an al-Qaida base in the region, he said. McConnell noted the camps are in an area that has never been governed by any state or outside power.

On a visit to Pakistan on Monday, Vice President Dick Cheney met with President Gen. Pervez Musharraf to seek his aid in foiling an anticipated spring offensive by the Taliban and al-Qaida against coalition forces in Afghanistan.

Cheney was accompanied by Deputy CIA Director Stephen Kappes, suggesting that the U.S. officials were prepared to buttress their allegations about al-Qaida operations with intelligence data.


U.S. officials are concerned about a peace deal Pakistan signed with tribal leaders of the North Waziristan region in September. In that agreement, the tribes promised to respect the authority of the Pakistani government and curtail cross-border attacks by militants.

In return, Musharraf returned some of the tribes' weapons, released some prisoners and withdrew from posts inside North Waziristan.

At Tuesday's hearing, Lt. Gen. Michael Maples, head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, said the tribes have not abided by most terms of the agreement. McConnell added U.S. intelligence believes al-Qaida's training and related capabilities increased as a result of the deal.

Musharraf's office confirmed that during the meeting, Cheney expressed concern that al-Qaida was "regrouping" in the tribal areas and that the vice president "called for concerted efforts in countering the threat."

Musharraf, his office said, told Cheney that Pakistan was already doing all it could to fight the militants.

Sherpao insisted Pakistan was "fighting the scourge of terrorism in the best interest of Pakistan."

Musharraf is a key ally of the United States in its fight against Islamic militants.

© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17380397/

Taliban official says bin Laden is alive - Focus on Afghanistan - MSNBC.com

Taliban official says bin Laden is alive - Focus on Afghanistan - MSNBC.com

Taliban official says bin Laden is alive

‘He’s not yet martyred,’ says senior commander; NATO expect offensive

The Associated Press
Updated: 11:51 a.m. ET March 1, 2007
LONDON - A senior Taliban commander says Osama bin Laden is alive and in contact with leaders of Afghanistan’s Taliban insurgents, according to an interview aired on British television.

Mullah Dadullah said he had not met bin Laden since the fall of the Taliban regime after the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, but said “we know he’s still alive.”

“He’s not yet martyred. Such information would be easy to get — his comrades stand shoulder to shoulder with us. They keep us informed,” Dadullah said in an interview broadcast Wednesday by Channel 4 News.

The authenticity of the information could not be confirmed. Channel 4 did not say how it had obtained the footage, and it was not known when or where Dadullah made the comments, which were translated into English.

Dadullah, commander of Taliban operations in eastern and southeastern Afghanistan and a trusted associate of Taliban leader Mullah Omar, said bin Laden met outsiders rarely. Dadullah did not comment on bin Laden’s whereabouts.

“Only his comrades see him; we exchange messages with each other to share plans,” Dadullah said. “We also go to the battlefield together. We actually meet very rarely, just for important consultations. It’s hard for anyone to meet bin Laden himself now, but we know he’s still alive.”

Dadullah said the Taliban had “hundreds more” suicide bombers ready to attack NATO forces in Afghanistan.

NATO commanders have said they believe the Taliban plans a spring offensive against alliance troops in the country.

© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10624157/from/RS.1/

Silicon 'found in contaminated fuel tanks'

telegraph
The petrol contamination scare which has caused hundreds of cars in the South East to break down may be caused by silicon, it emerged today.

It is understood that the element - which should not be in petrol - has been detected in the fuel tanks of some of the affected vehicles. This may explain why they have been juddering and misfiring.

Testing agencies have not yet revealed in how many cars silicon has been found, or in what amounts. It is just one possible explanation for the contamination, the AA told Telegraph.co.uk.

Silicon has many industrial uses. In its basic form it is used in semi-conductors, and its compounds including silica are used to form glasses, cements, ceramics and lubricants.

Given the spread of petrol stations affected by the contaminated fuel, silicon would have to have entered the petrol at some point in the supply chain.

Motorists were today told to consider replacing the petrol in their tanks, even if they are unaffected by the contaminated fuel scare.

Ray Holloway, the director of the Peter Retailers’ Association, said drivers should think about getting fresh fuel even if their vehicle is not suffering any problems.

Trading standards officials are investigating complaints from hundreds of drivers who claim they have been sold contaminated fuel.

Many complain that their cars have juddered, misfired and suffered loss of power in the last week. Most complaints come from the south east of England.

Petrol retailers say they are baffled by the complaints. Levels of ethanol, the chemical added to petrol to make it less environmentally harmful, have been normal.

"Motorists who have not been affected could save themselves a bill by changing the petrol in their tanks. That would be my recommendation," Mr Holloway said.

The spotlight is on oxygen sensors in car exhausts that have failed in some vehicles, probably as a result of faulty petrol. As a result, engine management systems cut power to prevent further damage to the engine, allowing drivers to only "limp home".

Manufacturers are working flat out to provide replacement parts after garages ran out of stock as they struggle to cope with demand.

Many of the drivers who have complained said they bought petrol from Tesco and Morrisons. Both supermarkets said they had tested their stocks of unleaded fuel and not found any contamination or abnormalities.

Independent oil company Greenergy - which is part owned by Tesco - has tested fuel supplied to the supermarkets to see if it was faulty. A spokesman said "extensive" tests showed that it met industry standards.

The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders advised motorists to keep all their fuel receipts. If their vehicle is affected, they should contact their car dealer for advice.

The Association of British Insurers (ABI) said motorists affected by contaminated petrol may be able to claim for accidental damage if they have comprehensive cover. A spokesman urged all motorists to keep any evidence that they have purchased the allegedly contaminated petrol, such as receipts or other paperwork.

He said: "At the moment, it is still not clear where liability for this problem lies.

"Nevertheless, the insurance industry can provide this important reassurance to customers in the meantime that, provided they have comprehensive insurance, they need not lose out."

Adam Cracknell, of the RAC, warned drivers not to attempt siphoning petrol from their tanks. He said many modern engines hold the fuel under pressure and removing it should only be done by a mechanic.

"If you have a bucket full of contaminated fuel and it causes a fire then you may be in breach of your insurance and lose your house as well as your car," he said.

Tesco said the problems all appear to be linked to forecourts in the south east of the country served by a refinery in Essex. Asda, which does not get petrol from Greenergy, said it has received about 80 complaints from customers. A spokeswoman said checks have shown no problems with fuel on sale.