Monday, April 16, 2007

ABC News: EU President Germany Denounces Russian Crackdown

ABC News: EU President Germany Denounces Russian Crackdown

EU President Germany Denounces Russian Crackdown
Riot Police Kicked and Chased Anti-Kremlin Demonstrators

April 16, 2007— - EU president Germany on Monday called a Russian police crackdown on anti-Kremlin protesters and media over the weekend "unacceptable" and demanded Moscow explain its actions.

"The excessive use of force that we saw over the weekend is worrying and assaults on the media ... are unacceptable," government spokesman Thomas Steg told reporters at a regular news conference.

"The German government expects and demands a thorough clarification of the events in Moscow and St. Petersburg, particularly the actions which prevented journalists from doing their jobs."

Riot police wielding batons beat, kicked and chased anti-Kremlin demonstrators in St. Petersburg on Sunday, a day after authorities detained several hundred protesters in Moscow, including former world chess champion Garry Kasparov.

Police also took journalists, including German television reporters, into custody, prompting a complaint by the German embassy in Moscow, a foreign ministry spokesman said.

"An open, peaceful, dynamic civil society are cornerstones of democratic society," ministry spokesman Jens Ploetner said. "These themes are, were and remain issues for discussion when we talk with the Russian side."

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has been more outspoken in criticising Russia on its human rights record and treatment of the media than her predecessor Gerhard Schroeder, who developed a close relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

But given Germany's dependence on Russian energy and her current role as EU president, Merkel must ensure relations with Moscow remain on a good track and has kept her criticism measured.

The European Union will soon be negotiating a new cooperation and partnership agreement with Russia and has been keen to avert a split with Putin over controversial U.S. plans to deploy a missile shield in central Europe.

Copyright © 2007 ABC News Internet Ventures

Virginia School Shooting: Another Government Black-Op?


prisonplanet
Early details suggest Columbine-style set-up to justify mass gun control, VA Tech has "blood on their hands," banned concealed carry, disarming victims
Early details about the horrific school shooting at Virginia Tech strongly indicate that these events represent a Columbine-style black-op that will be exploited in the coming days to push for mass gun control and further turning our schools into prisons.

Eyewitness Matt Kazee told the Alex Jones Show that it was a full two to three hours after the shootings began that loudspeakers installed around the campus were used to warn students to stay indoors and that a shooter was on the loose.

Quite how the killer was afforded so much time before any action was taken to stop him is baffling, especially considering the fact that the campus, according to Kazee, was crawling with police before the event happened due to numerous bomb threats that had been phoned in last week.

The shootings came three days after a bomb threat Friday forced the cancellation of classes in three buildings, WDBJ in Roanoke reported. Also, the 100,000-square-foot Torgersen Hall was evacuated April 2 after police received a written bomb threat, The Roanoke Times reported.

CNN quoted a student who was outraged at the delay in identifying and stopping the killer.

"What happened today this was ridiculous. And I don't know what happened or what was going through this guy's mind," student Jason Piatt told CNN. "But I'm pretty outraged and I'll say on the record I'm pretty outraged that someone died in a shooting in a dorm at 7 o'clock in the morning and the first e-mail about it — no mention of locking down campus, no mention of canceling classes — they just mention that they're investigating a shooting two hours later at 9:22."

He added: "That's pretty ridiculous and meanwhile, while they're sending out that e-mail, 22 more people got killed."

The details that are beginning to emerge fill the criteria that this could very well be another government black-op that will be used as justification for more gun control and turing our schools into prisons, festooned with armed guards, surveillance cameras and biometric scanning to gain entry.

Ironic therefore it is that Virginia is a concealed carry state and yet Virginia Tech campus recently enforced a policy prohibiting "unauthorized possession, storage or control" of firearms on campus. According to gun rights activists such as Aaron Zelman of Jews For The Preservation of Firearms, VA Tech has "blood on its hands" for disarming the victims who could potentially have defended themselves against the killer.

Initial reports suggested there were two shooters, but the story quickly changed to just one shooter who later killed himself (as happens in almost all these cases) or was shot by police.

Eyewitness accounts describe police hiding behind trees and failing to pursue the killer, while ordering the school to be placed on lockdown so nobody could escape the carnage as the killer picked off his targets with seemingly little interruption from the police.

At the moment, the official death toll is 30, but could rise, making this the deadliest school shooting in history.

If these figures are accurate, the casualty figures surpass those of the school shooting at Columbine in 1999 when Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris killed 12 students and a teacher before killing themselves.

It is well documented that disturbing questions remain over the incident at Columbine. It is clear that authorities had prior knowledge of what was going to happen. Observers were in the area hours before the shooting took place. Articles from the Associated Press stated that ballistics from Columbine show that six of the thirteen victims were possibly shot and killed by Jefferson County SWAT.

In addition, it was never properly explained how Klebold and Harris were able to transport over 100 bombs into the school before the shootings began.

In the aftermath of Columbine there were calls for vastly increased gun control laws, more than 15 state legislatures passed significant gun control bills or dropped NRA-supported bills.

In 1996 a similar incident occurred in Dunblane in Scotland where sixteen children and one adult were killed. The resulting inquiry recommended tighter control of handgun ownership, public feeling had turned against private gun ownership, allowing a much more restrictive ban on handguns to pass.

It then emerged that the killer Thomas Hamilton was heavily involved in Freemasonry, as well as running clubs for young boys, a fact which Labour and Tory ministers acknowledged in correspondence to each other. A a 100-year public secrecy order was placed on the documents, along with the majority of other information relating to the case including the police report. There have been allegations that the lengthy closure order was placed on the report after it linked Hamilton to figures in the Scottish establishment, including two senior politicians and a lawyer.

In both the Dunblane and Columbine cases the shooters turned the guns on themselves after the killing spree was over.

We will have more on this story as it unfolds.

US-Korean man jailed for spying

bbc
An American man of Korean origin has been sentenced to nine years in jail by a South Korean court for spying for Communist North Korea.

Jan Min-ho, also known as Michael Jang, was found guilty of passing sensitive information about politicians and security to Pyongyang.

He was one of five people convicted of espionage by the court in Seoul.

Prosecutors have called it the biggest spying case since the two Koreas began a process of reconciliation in 2000.

Two of the five are members of the left-leaning minor opposition Democratic Labor Party (DLP).

Pyongyang had denounced the case as a "calculated plot" to smear North Korea.

'Politically-motivated'

Michael Jang, 44, was accused of being the group's ring leader, regularly meeting North Korean agents in China and Thailand after his first visit to the North in 1989.

He was found guilty of passing on "national secrets", which included details about South Korean politics and its politicians.

"Judging from the danger and confidentiality of the crime, a heavy jail sentence is not escapable," judge Kim Dong-o told him.

The other four received jail sentences of between four and six years.

They were told by the judge that their links with Jang meant that they could not avoid responsibility over the spying charges, "even if their behaviour was driven from their aspiration for inter-Korean unification".

He said their sentences reflect the fact "it is hard to believe the information they had delivered to the North seriously hurts national security".

The DLP - which has been under fire for its pro-North Korea image - said the case was politically motivated.

"This shows that acts of trying to accuse our party of being associated with a spy ring were only constructed to run the Democratic Labor Party into the ground," it said.

North and South Korea are still technically at war since their 1950-53 conflict ended in an armistice rather than a peace agreement.

But South Korea has operated a so-called "sunshine policy" of engagement with its Communist neighbour since 2000.

That policy has come under strain since North Korea tested a nuclear device in October, with calls for the South to be tougher on its neighbour.

France knew al-Qaida planned hijack - International Terrorism - MSNBC.com

France knew al-Qaida planned hijack - International Terrorism - MSNBC.com

France knew al-Qaida planned hijack
Intelligence reports ahead of 9/11 were handed over to CIA, paper says
Reuters
Updated: 9:51 a.m. ET April 16, 2007

PARIS - French secret services produced nine reports between September 2000 and August 2001 looking at the al-Qaida threat to the United States, and knew it planned to hijack an aircraft, the French newspaper Le Monde said on Monday.

The newspaper said it had obtained 328 pages of classified documents that showed foreign agents had infiltrated Osama bin Laden’s network and were carefully tracking its moves.

One document prepared in January 2001 was entitled, “Plan to hijack an aircraft by Islamic radicals,” and said the operation had been discussed in Kabul at the start of 2000 by al-Qaida, Taliban and Chechen militants.

The hijack was meant to happen between March and September 2000 but the planners put it back “because of differences of opinion, particularly over the date, objective and participants,” Le Monde said, citing the report.

The attacks on U.S. cities that eventually took place on Sept. 11, 2001 killed almost 3,000 people.

Specifics not known
Le Monde said the French report of January 2001 had been handed over to a CIA operative in Paris, but that no mention of it had ever been made in the official U.S. September 11 Commission, which produced its findings in July 2004.

The newspaper quoted a former senior official at France’s DGSE secret service agency as saying that, although France thought a hijack was being planned, the DGSE did not know that the plot involved flying aircraft into buildings.

“You have to remember that a plane hijack (in January 2001) did not have the same significance as it did after Sept. 11. At the time, it implied forcing a plane to land at an airport and undertaking negotiations,” said Pierre-Antoine Lorenzi.

Le Monde said the documents showed the French believed bin Laden was still receiving help from family members and senior officials in Saudi Arabia ahead of Sept. 11, 2001, despite attempts to clamp down on the network after al-Qaida’s attacks on U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya in 1998.
Copyright 2007 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18133920/
© 2007 MSNBC.com

Ministers Loyal to Iraqi Cleric to Quit Government Posts

nytimes
BAGHDAD, April 16 — Political followers of Moktada al-Sadr, the Shiite cleric, said today that their six cabinet ministers would quit their posts in government in protest at the refusal of Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki to set a timetable for American troops to withdraw from Iraq.

At a press conference, legislators loyal to Mr. Sadr read from a statement that they said they had received from Mr. Sadr ordering the withdrawal from the cabinet.

Mr. Sadr has issued threats to pull out of the government several times before but has not carried through on them until now. The lawmakers said they would not replace the ministers with their own members but wanted Mr. Maliki to make new independent and technocratic appointments.

It is not immediately clear what the effect of the move could be. But the withdrawal could seriously undermine Mr. Maliki’s already shaky administration.

Last week, tens of thousands of protesters loyal to Mr. Sadr took to the streets of the holy city of Najaf in a rally to demand an end to the American military presence in Iraq.

Afterwards, Mr. Maliki said he saw no need to set a timetable for American withdrawal, a move that has apparently angered Mr. Sadr.

Mr. Sadr did not appear at the rally and did not deliver his order in person today. He went underground after the American military began a new security push in Baghdad on Feb. 14, and his whereabouts are still unknown.

Mr. Sadr has also criticized attacks against his organization during the Baghdad security push.

On Sunday, at least 34 people were killed in Baghdad in another day punctuated by car bombings and suicide vest attacks on civilian targets of the kind that the two-month-old security crackdown has so far been unable to restrain.

All six bombs that caused fatalities were detonated in predominantly Shiite areas, which have been the persistent target of Sunni militant bombing attacks.

The day’s military casualties included the deaths of two British servicemen killed when two British Puma troop-carrying helicopters crashed northwest of Baghdad in a mission before dawn. The United States military announced three deaths on Sunday: two soldiers and a marine, killed in separate incidents.

Six British servicemen were injured in the helicopter crash, which Defense Minister Desmond Browne of Britain said appeared to be accidental rather than a result of insurgent ground fire, which had downed several American military helicopters in Iraq this year.

News reports in Britain suggested that there had been a midair collision, possibly during a Special Operations raid of the kind that elite British and American troops frequently carry out from bases near the crash site, southwest of the Sunni town of Taji, on Baghdad’s outskirts.

One of the injured servicemen was said to be in critical condition in an American military hospital.

The worst of Sunday’s bombings in Baghdad occurred in the predominantly Shiite district of Shurta in southwest Baghdad, where two car bombs that exploded minutes apart killed at least 17 people and wounded 50, according to an Iraqi police official at Yarmouk hospital, where many of the casualties were taken. Witnesses said that the bombs detonated in a busy street market and at a nearby intersection, and that about half of those who died were women and children.

At midafternoon, a bomb in a parked minibus exploded in the Karada district of south-central Baghdad, an area with a mainly Shiite and Christian population. Police officials said nine people had been killed and 17 wounded. A few hours earlier, according to the police, a suicide bomber blew himself up in a minibus on a busy street that heads into the Kadhimiya district of north-central Baghdad, a mainly Shiite district, killing at least three people and wounding 11.

Two more bombs exploded in Karada at nightfall, killing five people and wounding 27, including three policemen, according to the police.

In the northern city of Mosul, the police said two oil trucks driven by suicide bombers had exploded outside an Iraqi military base in the Yarmouk neighborhood, killing at least four people, including two soldiers, and wounding more than 20 others. A police statement said there were other bodies in the rubble, and described the attack as having followed a familiar insurgent pattern, with the second bomber waiting to detonate until rescuers and bystanders gathered around the wreckage caused by the first.

The bombings in Baghdad maintained a grim staccato of attacks that have marked the first phase of the American-led attempt to regain control of the capital with the so-called surge of nearly 30,000 additional troops that President Bush ordered deployed to Iraq late last year. American commanders say the effort has reduced the Sunni-Shiite sectarian violence that racked Baghdad after the bombing of a revered Shiite shrine in the city of Samarra early last year, but that curbing insurgent bombings, many of them by groups linked to Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia, has so far eluded them.

Even the hopes generated by the falling numbers of unidentified bodies found daily around the capital, the main bright spot in the new security plan so far, were dimmed on Sunday when the police reported finding 30 bodies, the highest daily number in a month. The number of bodies found on wasteland, in sewers and elsewhere frequently averaged 30 or more a day last year, after the Samarra attack.

An indication of how Baghdad’s six million people are reacting to the new security crackdown came from the frustrated and angry mood at the scene of Sunday’s minibus bombing in the Karada district. Among survivors and others who helped extract victims from the carnage, there was widespread blame for the Qaeda terrorists who are said by the Americans to be responsible for many of the bombings. But there was reproach, too, for the Americans, and for the United States-supported government of Prime Minister Maliki, for failing to halt the attacks.

“I am asking myself, where is the security plan?” said Zahid Awad Slaman, a 30-year-old nighttime security guard who was riding his motorcycle nearby when the minibus blew up. He described seeing a fireball bursting from the parked vehicle, which enveloped people nearby as the blast from the bomb threw cars across the street.

The Americans “said they had rid us of the tyrant Saddam, but what have they done for us since then?” he said. “I blame the Americans and the government for this, because the violence grows day by day. The foreign troops have caused Muslims to kill their Muslim brothers.”

At a news conference in Baghdad, the hard choices the war has placed before American politicians were evident as Senator Chuck Hagel, Republican of Nebraska, spoke with reporters about his two-day visit here, his fifth since the invasion in March 2003. Senator Hagel, who has said he is considering a presidential bid, broke with his party last month in voting for a Democratic-sponsored bill calling for an American troop withdrawal by March 31, 2008.

But he was reluctant to reaffirm support for a withdrawal deadline as he discussed what he had learned during a visit to American troops in Ramadi, in the heart of insurgent territory, and talks with top Iraqi and American officials in Baghdad.

He predicted that Congress would break the deadlock with President Bush by striking the withdrawal deadline that both houses had attached to bills approving about $100 billion in supplemental war financing for Iraq and Afghanistan. But he said the compromise would still involve Congressionally mandated “benchmarks” for progress in Iraq, which he did not specify.

The senator appeared eager during his visit to avoid political embarrassment of the kind that enveloped his fellow Republican senator, John McCain of Arizona, a strong supporter of the American troop buildup, when he toured a Baghdad market two weeks ago under the protection of 100 American troops and hovering helicopters and later told reporters that the scene at the market reflected the progress achieved by the buildup.

Asked on Sunday what he had done during his day in Baghdad, Senator Hagel, a close friend of Senator McCain’s, flashed a wry smile and said, “We did no shopping while we were here.”

Pope quotes Marx in new Jesus book

times of india
VATICAN CITY: Pope Benedict XVI draws from Karl Marx's theory of alienation in his forthcoming book on Jesus Christ to illustrate his point that the biblical parable of the Good Samaritan is still relevant today.

The reference to the 19th-Century German philosopher and founder of modern communism is found in chapter seven of Jesus of Nazareth, extracts of which were published on Wednesday by Italian daily Corriere della Sera.

"Karl Marx describes man's alienation in a drastic way; although by limiting his reasoning to the material sphere he fails to reach the true depths of alienation, he nevertheless provides a clear image of the man who falls victim to the robbers," Joseph Ratzinger writes.

In his book, the pope sees the biblical account of the Samaritan who rescues and cares for a stranger who has been robbed and beaten as a metaphor that should teach modern day Catholics to care for their neighbours, whether they are a drug addict or an African whose country has been "looted and robbed" by colonialists.