Tuesday, March 04, 2008

CNN Warns Americans A New Great Depression Is Coming

Darryl Mason
Tuesday, March 4, 2008


The American economy is propped up on faith and credit, and Wall Street is now in a short supply of both of these essentials. The video below from CNN Money contains the sort of talk that can start runs on banks to withdraw savings and shatter stock markets. That doesn't mean, however, these commentators are not telling the truth.


History will likely record that the "$3-8 Trillion" Iraq War was a key reason why the American economy shuddered to a stop and a new Great Depression began, if the financial genocide continues :

The spending on Iraq was a hidden cause of the current credit crunch because the US central bank responded to the massive financial drain of the war by flooding the American economy with cheap credit.

"The regulators were looking the other way and money was being lent to anybody this side of a life-support system..."

That led to a housing bubble and a consumption boom, and the fallout was plunging the US economy into recession...

Iraq: Theater of the Macabre

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
March 4, 2008

In response to Alex’s call for videos demonstrating the psychopathology and sadism of “our troops” in Iraq following the breaking story of David Motari, the alleged Marine puppy killer, listeners have responded on the Prison Planet Forum with a virtual theater macabre of sickness and deranged perversity.

Please note: it is extremely difficult for us to post these videos and we do not do so out of any morbid fascination with murder, torture, and humiliation, but rather as an example of the sort of behavior “our troops” engage in as they go about undertaking the criminal dirty work of the hell spawn neocons. Considering the almost complete lack of coverage of these disgusting events in the corporate media, we feel compelled to post these videos.

Remember, a large percentage of Iraqi veterans end up working for police departments when they finish their “tours” in Iraq — multiple back-to-back tours, obviously to indoctrinate them in sadism and the techniques of inhumanity — and will be used against the American people during the next “emergency” when the reigning decider-commander — Bush, Obama, or Hillary — will impose martial law.




























































These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark

David Motari, Alleged Puppy Killer, Tracked Down

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars

March 4, 2008


Gold


















It didn’t take long for internet sleuths to track down the perp. David Motari, the Marine accused of pitching a puppy off a cliff for the sheer psychopathic fun of it, is a member of the Bebo social network. Although the network requires registration to view member profiles, an enterprising researcher was able to login and screen capture Motari’s profile (click small image at left to see a larger image).

Motari is a Lance corporal, 1st Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, stationed at Haqlaniyah, Iraq, and based out of the Marine Corps Base at Kaneohe, Hawaii. He is from Seattle, Washington.

“Don’t have to follow nobodies (sic) footsteps,” writes the Marine on his Bebo profile. “I’m makin my own, fully grown, and this life is my own.” Motari tells us he is “happiest when… Chillin out, sleeping, playing sport, hittin the gym, hangin with friends, with my family, at home, fridays, eating, running, cruisin, and defintely (sic) when I get out of the marine corps!” He forgot to add he is especially happy when emulating Jeffrey Dahmer, who also shared a penchant for torturing and killing small defenseless animals.

“There is no way to know for sure if the puppy is real or not unless you are the one who produced it,” explains Charlie Powell, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University.

However, after watching the video on YouTube, it certainly appears the puppy was alive prior to Motari’s sadistic stunt.

Bernanke sees more house price drops

ORLANDO, Florida (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke on Tuesday warned mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures were likely to rise and that more house price declines could be expected, and called for active measures to stabilize housing markets.

"This situation calls for a vigorous response," Bernanke said in a speech to the Independent Community Bankers of America, referring to government and private-sector initiatives to slow the rate of home loan failures.

"Measures to reduce preventable foreclosures could help not only stressed borrowers but also their communities and, indeed, the broader economy," he said.

Current housing difficulties differ from past housing market slumps because of the large number of homeowners who owe more on their home loans than their homes are worth, Bernanke said.

"In this environment, principal reductions that restore some equity for the homeowner may be a relatively more effective means of avoiding delinquency and foreclosure" than reducing interest rates on troubled home loans, he said.

Face up to losses, Bernanke tells bankers

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- Rather than cling to the illusion that they'll get repaid in full, banks should face up to their losses from all those bad mortgages they underwrote, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke told bankers Tuesday.

It's time to take the losses onto the books, so they and the rest of the economy can move on, he said.

All the debt counseling, foreclosure freezing, HOPE alliancing, and interest-rate reducing haven't made a dent in the problem yet. So far, he said, you haven't done nothing.

Bernanke's remarks were the clearest sign yet that he's beginning to understand the full extent of the mess the banks made.

"This situation calls for a vigorous response," Bernanke said in a speech to the Independent Community Bankers of America. The only way to avoid millions of foreclosures is to figure out how to reduce the principal amount the homeowner owes.

In other words, face up to the fact that home prices have plunged and won't go back to lofty levels for a long, long time.

Because foreclosure is so expensive (taking 50% of the principal in legal fees, missed payments and other expenses), it probably makes more sense (and dollars) for the lender to simply write down the value of the mortgage to what the home is actually worth on the market. Writing down the principal would allow the borrower to refinance into an affordable mortgage in many cases.
That would keep many families in their home, and help housing prices adjust.

Bernanke's idea is simple in theory but terribly complex in practice. Because most of these mortgages have been securitized, writing down the principal could require the agreement of dozens, or hundreds, or even thousands of "owners."

But Bernanke was optimistic that the brilliant minds who cooked up the complicated financial instruments that got us into this problem can also figure a way to get us out.

And if they can't, maybe it's time for more "vigorous" action from someone who can.

Smiling US Marine throws puppy off Iraq hill

By Bonnie Malkin

Last Updated: 12:30pm GMT 04/03/2008

The American army is investigating shocking footage of a grinning Marine throwing a yelping puppy into a gully in Iraq.

The clip, which has prompted fierce criticism of the military, appeared on video sharing site YouTube.

It showed two Marines dressed in combat gear, one holding the young dog by the scruff of its neck.

The dog, which looks about eight weeks old, is motionless.

"Cute little puppy, huh?", one Marine can be heard saying.

"Oh so cute, so cute little puppy," the other responds in a child-like voice.

The Marine holding the dog then turns and throws it into the ravine below. The animal can be heard yelping until it hits the ground.

A spokesman for the American military condemned the video as "shocking and deplorable" and said an investigation was underway into the incident.

Marine spokesman Major Chris Perrine said the culprit was believed to be based in Hawaii.

"We do not tolerate this type of behaviour and will take appropriate action," he said.

(( This video is being removed from Youtube with quickness, since this appeared in the controlled mainstream media. If its unavailable. Just go to Youtube. Search "Marine Puppy" and sort by date. As its taken down, we will add it again. This is going to be seen. ))

US seeks terrorists in web worlds

By Chris Vallance
Reporter, BBC iPM

The US government has begun a project to develop ways to spot terrorists who are using virtual worlds.

Codenamed Reynard it aims to recognise "normal" behaviour in online worlds and home in on anomalous activity.

It is likely to develop tools and techniques for intelligence officers who are hunting terrorists and terror groups on the net or in virtual worlds.

The project was welcomed by experts tracking terror groups using the net to organise or carry out attacks.

Growing threat

Brief details about Reynard came to light in a report sent to the US Congress by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) - which co-ordinates the work of US intelligence agencies.


We can see groups emerging in cyber spaces and virtual communities that would be wholly virtual
Roderick Jones, Concentric Solutions
In that report, which talked about the data mining efforts undertaken by the ODNI, Reynard was described as: "a seedling effort to study the emerging phenomenon of social (particularly terrorist) dynamics in virtual worlds and large-scale online games and their implications for the intelligence community".

Using publicly available data Reynard researchers will carry out observational studies to establish "baseline normative behaviors".

Once these are identified, Reynard will "then apply the lessons learned to determine the feasibility of automatically detecting suspicious behavior and actions in the virtual world".

"It's a positive step," said Andrew Cochran, founder and co-chairman of the Counterterrorism Foundation. "For a number of years we were behind in chasing jihadists' presence on the net and detecting it."

"That's a very sensible step at the moment," said Roderick Jones, a vice president of Concentric Solutions and a former special branch officer. "Just to feel their way around them and work out what new intelligence collection methods might be required to deal with this threat, because you won't be able to use traditional law enforcement methods."

New worlds

A senior intelligence officer at the ODNI said Reynard was in its very early stages and it was too soon to say which online worlds it would be studying. He added that any work on it would be purely for research rather than "operational" purposes.

"I think its highly unlikely terrorists would use things like Second Life or World of Warcraft as they do not have the necessary security," said Mr Jones.

"Terrorist use of the internet at the moment relies on password protected forums," he added.

Said Mr Cochran: "All of the major terrorist treatises have been distributed through the internet so taking it to a virtual world with multi-player role games is really an easy step."

It was inevitable that terror groups would make greater use of the internet and the possibilities that virtual spaces offered them, said Mr Jones.

"There's more a chance of things like Jihad worlds coming online in the next five years I think," he said.

The visual richness of virtual worlds made them good places to educate recruits about techniques, said Mr Jones.

Attack pattern

"We can see groups emerging in cyber spaces and virtual communities that would be wholly virtual," he said. "They would organise and radicalise in virtual worlds and attack using cyber methods without becoming a real world presence in any real way."

Many groups were likely to use the expertise and skills they learn in virtual worlds to target key net systems.

Ken Silva, chief technology officer for Verisign which oversees some of the net's core address books, said such an attack could be "devastating".

"We see a continuing growth in the amount of horsepower in the attacks that are directed at infrastructure servers," said Mr Silva.

"We are seeing a large shift from attacks that are directed at individual websites," he said. "The sophistication is getting a little smarter and they are attacking the infrastructure pieces behind them..., which is typically in most production environments the least invested in."

Some of the basic systems of the net, such as the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) which helps data reach its intended destination, were open to attack.

An accidental misconfiguration of BGP in some routers in Pakistan caused the recent problems with YouTube which left many people unable to reach the video site.

"BGP is essentially a relatively unprotected protocol and is seriously vulnerable to disruption," he said. "Should that happen, it could take a very long time to correct that situation."

"This has to be fought at every level," he said.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/technology/7274377.stm

Published: 2008/03/03 11:32:50 GMT

Barclays 'questioned over terrorist blacklist'

By Katherine Griffiths, Financial Services Editor

Last Updated: 7:30am GMT 04/03/2008

Barclays is being investigated by the US government over possible breaches of rules banning banks from doing business with states on a terrorist blacklist.

The bank said it had been contacted by the Department of Justice (DoJ) and the New York district attorney with questions about payments made in dollars through its New York branch. The payments may have been made by people or companies from states which are on the US blacklist of nations it believes sponsor terrorism. That list includes Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria.

The US has banned banks from carrying out most transactions in dollars for clients from these countries to try to undermine terrorists' ability to finance their activity.

The probe, which has gone unnoticed until now, was referred to in Barclays' notes to its annual 2007 results on February 19, where it warned "the potential financial effect of any resolution could be substantial".

In the past few years US banks have had to obey the rules, which carry heavy penalties and potential criminal prosecution. America is now putting increasing pressure on European banks to follow.

ABN Amro was fined $80m (£40m) in civil penalties in 2005 for transactions through its New York offices which the US government said failed to meet the necessary controls on money laundering.

The case dealt a serious blow to the credibility of the Dutch bank. ABN was sold following a bidding battle to a consortium led by Royal Bank of Scotland in October.

RBS said in its annual results published last week that ABN is the subject of an ongoing criminal probe by the DoJ over the same issue. Negotiations over a possible $500m settlement are ongoing, RBS said.

HSBC yesterday noted in its results that it has a "small representative office in Tehran". HSBC said it recognised that should it break the US rules on sanctions, there would be "serious legal and reputational consequences".

America's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) polices companies to ensure sanctions are upheld.

Certain foreign institutions are completely banned from making dollar payments, while in other cases "U-turn" transactions are permitted, whereby a dollar payment is legal as long as it does not start or end in the suspect country.

European banks such as Barclays and RBS must follow US policies because they have large businesses there.

Ellen Zimiles, chief executive of Daylight, which advises companies on compliance with OFAC and other laws, said: " Non US institutions which operate in the US have to make sure their people have proper training and understand what the issues are."

Barclays said it was carrying out its own internal review. It said the outcome was unlikely to have "a material adverse effect" on its finances.

Separately, Barclays said it was buying Russian lender Expobank for £373m in its first overseas acquisition since losing the bidding contest for ABN. The deal expands the empire of Frits Seegers, head of Barclays' retail and commercial banking business.

Expobank, with one of the largest networks of cash machines in Moscow, has net assets of £93m.

Crisis at Colombia Border Spills Into Diplomatic Realm


Published: March 4, 2008

CARACAS, Venezuela — The three-way crisis in the Andes escalated Monday as Ecuador broke off diplomatic relations with Colombia, and Venezuela expelled Colombia’s ambassador and other diplomats.

The three countries swapped charges of treachery and deceit, ratcheting up tension in a dispute that began when Colombian forces hunted down and killed a Colombian guerrilla leader on Ecuadorean soil over the weekend.

The Venezuelan Foreign Ministry, in ordering the expulsion of diplomatic personnel of the Colombian Embassy, said it was acting “in defense of the sovereignty of the fatherland and the dignity of the Venezuelan people.”

President Rafael Correa of Ecuador, who had expelled Colombia’s ambassador over the weekend, went a step further on Monday, breaking off diplomatic relations. The move was not unexpected after his claim that President Álvaro Uribe of Colombia was lying about the nature of the raid.

Venezuela and Ecuador sent troops to the Colombian border on Sunday in response to Colombia’s military raid on a rebel encampment in the jungle about a mile inside Ecuador. Colombian forces killed 21 guerrillas belonging to the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, Colombia’s largest rebel group.

In addition to killing a senior rebel leader, Raúl Reyes, Colombia said it recovered his laptop computer, whose contents were at the center of several allegations on Monday.

At a news conference in Bogotá, Gen. Oscar Naranjo, Colombia’s police chief, accused Venezuela of channeling $300 million to the FARC, based on what he said was information obtained from Mr. Reyes’s computer.

General Naranjo also said computer documents showed financial support from the FARC for President Hugo Chávez of Venezuela, going back to the time Mr. Chávez spent in prison after an unsuccessful coup attempt in Caracas in 1992.

“This implies more than cozying up, but an armed alliance between the FARC and the Venezuelan government,” General Naranjo said.

Venezuela’s government, which sent tank units to its border with Colombia in a response to the Colombian raid, denied aiding the rebels. “We are used to the Colombian government’s lies,” said Vice President Ramón Carrizales.

General Naranjo also referred to information suggesting that the FARC, which has been at war with Colombia’s government for the last four decades, had appeared interested in acquiring 110 pounds of uranium.

The general displayed photographs and documents he said were taken from Mr. Reyes’s computer, but the context of the information was unclear.

Ecuador also rejected claims by Colombia of ties with the FARC, and sent 3,200 troops to Sucumbios, an Amazonian province near its border with Colombia where the attack on the FARC’s camp took place.

Mr. Correa, the Ecuadorean president, said the Colombian rebels were killed in their sleep “in their pajamas,” and not in the heat of pursuit as Colombia’s security forces said. Ecuadorean emergency officials recovered several wounded members of the FARC, transporting them to hospitals in Quito.

Faced with one of Latin America’s worst diplomatic crises in recent years, the Organization of American States said it would convene a meeting in Washington on Tuesday to try to prevent an escalation of the dispute between Colombia, a staunch Bush administration ally, and the leftist governments of Ecuador and Venezuela.

Even as Colombia’s government offered details on the FARC’s relations with Venezuela and Ecuador, Colombian officials said Monday that they would not send more troops to the borders with the two countries in response to the mobilizations ordered by Mr. Chávez and Mr. Correa.

Because of the FARC’s resilient history at the heart of Colombia’s war, it has had contact with insurgencies and governments throughout Latin America and beyond, including the United States, which classifies the FARC and other armed groups in Colombia as terrorists.

For instance, in 1998 a Clinton administration official, Philip T. Chicola, then the State Department’s director of Andean affairs, had a clandestine meeting with Mr. Reyes in Costa Rica in an effort to establish a way of communicating with the FARC during times of crisis.

The meeting was described in a diplomatic cable written by Mr. Chicola in January 1999 and declassified in 2004. Also present at the meeting was Mr. Reyes’s wife, Olga Marín, a woman believed to be the daughter of the FARC’s top commander, Manuel Marulanda, and also reported to be present, and possibly wounded, in the raid on the jungle camp on Saturday.

The Bush administration on Monday reiterated its support for Colombia’s struggle against the FARC and cocaine trafficking, but called for a negotiated solution to the crisis.

“This, for us, is an issue between the governments of Colombia and Ecuador,” said Tom H. Casey, deputy spokesman at the State Department, in a briefing to reporters on Monday in Washington. “We believe it’s appropriate for them to work that out through diplomatic discussion.”

Still, what began over the weekend as an operation by Colombian forces in Ecuadorean territory has evolved into a wider regional matter.

“Our view of this issue right now is that there is no doubt that there is a territorial violation and we condemn it,” said Celso Amorim, Brazil’s foreign minister, speaking to reporters in Brasília. “It raises insecurity problems in all countries of the region, mostly in the smaller ones.”

And amid the Colombian accusations, Mr. Chávez remains at the center of the increasing tension, with his political opponents here criticizing his decision to mobilize troops and fighter jets in a show of Venezuelan force.

“If anyone has to protest, it is Ecuador’s government, as the military incident took place in Ecuadorean territory, not ours,” Teodoro Petkoff, the publisher of the newspaper Tal Cual, said in an editorial. “Venezuela has nothing to complain about.”

China denies U.S. computer hacking agenda

BEIJING, China (CNN) -- China rejected a U.S. report concluding that the Chinese military is secretly increasing spending to break into U.S. military computer systems, expand its Navy, and invest in intercontinental nuclear missiles and weapons to destroy satellites.

The United States must "abandon Cold War thinking" and adopt a better understanding of China to "promote a constructive Sino-U.S relationship," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang said Tuesday.

An annual Pentagon report to Congress said Monday that China's total military spending in 2007 was between $97 billion and $139 billion, but because of a lack of transparency, it's hard to tell exactly how much was spent and on what.

Xinhua -- China's official news agency -- said Tuesday that the country's 2008 military budget would rise by nearly 18 percent to $57 billion.

In comparison, the U.S. military budget request for 2008 is $481.4 billion, not including war requests.

Pentagon officials said a chunk of China's spending went to cyber warfare, as 2007 saw continued several "intrusions" believed to be from the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA). In the incidents, U.S. military unclassified computer systems were broken into and information was taken, according to Pentagon officials.

The Chinese spokesman said the Pentagon report was "interfering with China's internal issue and violating the standard of international relationship."

He said China's policies are peaceful and defensive.

"We are playing the crucial role to maintain peace in the Asia Pacific region and the world, and we are not a threat to any countries," Qin Gang said.

"We require the United States to abandon the Cold War thinking, understand China and its development in the right way, redress the misunderstanding on China's military report, and conduct action to promote constructive Sino-U.S relationship," he said.

He said the United States should "stick to the promise on opposing Taiwan independence, stop selling weapons to Taiwan and any kind of contact between the two militaries.

"Stop giving any wrong signals to Taiwan independence force, stay with China to maintain stability in Taiwan sea and Sino-U.S relationship," he said.

The Pentagon report said China was investing heavily in and fielding improved nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles and anti-satellite missiles.

The United States expressed its concern last year after China fired a missile at one of its old satellites and destroyed it, sending thousands of dangerous pieces of space debris around orbit.

The United States conducted a similar strike last month on a broken U.S. spy satellite before it re-entered the Earth's atmosphere. U.S. officials said the satellite was hit and broke into thousands of small pieces that burned up as they re-entered the Earth's atmosphere.

The United States is also concerned about the purchase of more submarines by the Chinese navy as well as plans for more aircraft carriers. The Chinese once had a small Navy. Now the United States is keeping an eye on the growing service amid concerns over Taiwan.

The concerns include "China's near-term focus on preparing for contingencies in the Taiwan Strait, including the possibility of U.S. intervention, which is an important driver of its modernization," the report says.

Additionally, the Chinese have placed about 100 more short-range missiles on the shore opposite Taiwan in the past year, it says.

Pentagon officials worry that the continued increase in Chinese military spending is slowly tipping the balance of power between China and Taiwan in China's favor. The United States has said it would help defend Taiwan if China invaded.

The report also says the PLA is "pursuing comprehensive transformation from a mass army designed for protracted wars of attrition on its territory to one capable of fighting and winning short-duration, high-intensity conflicts along its periphery against high-tech adversaries."

Such an army, the report says, would have "the greatest potential to compete militarily with the United States and field disruptive military technologies that could, over time, offset traditional U.S. military advantages."

The United States says that the lack of transparency by the Chinese on its spending poses "risks to stability by increasing the potential for misunderstanding and miscalculation," and that China has yet to explain to the international community the purpose of its military expansion, Pentagon officials said.

Doctors Encourage Children to Inform on Parents


David Gutierrez
Natural News

March 3, 2008

Encouraged by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), pediatricians across the United States have begun questioning children about their parents’ habits, in some cases even filing police reports based on this information, according to an opinion article published in the Boston Herald.

Article author Michael Graham recounts that his own children were asked by their doctor whether their parents used drugs and alcohol, owned guns, or were abusive. The doctor did not seek parental permission before asking the questions, nor did he inform them that they were being asked; Graham and his wife found out only after their children came home from the visits.

“The doctor wanted to know how much you and mom drink, and if I think it’s too much,” Graham reports his daughter saying. “She asked if you two did drugs, or if there are drugs in the house. The doctor wanted to know how we get along. And if, well, Daddy, if you made me feel uncomfortable.”

Graham also reports the case of an Uxbridge, Massachusetts man who had his legal gun ownership reported to the police by his daughter’s doctor. The doctor filed a police report after asking the 5-year-old girl if her father owned a gun, then following up with questions to her and her mother about the type and number of the weapons.

Graham blames the trend on guidelines issued by the AAP, which classifies parents as “persons of interest” and encourages doctors to ask children questions in order to uncover inappropriate or illegal behavior.

“The paranoia over parents is so strong that the AAP encourages doctors to ignore ‘legal barriers and deference to parental involvement’ and shake the children down for all the inside information they can get,” Graham writes.

According to Graham, anti-gun advocacy by pediatricians is widespread enough that “some states are considering legislation to stop it.”

“What this interrogation of children demonstrates,” added consumer health advocate Mike Adams, “is just how deeply the medical establishment now believes it has total authority over the lives of patients. This kind of behavior is arrogant, outrageous and should be outlawed,” Adams said.

Free Speech is Disorderly Conduct in Corpus Christi

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
March 3, 2008

It appears both the police and former president and war-criminal-at-large Bill Clinton have had it with people insisting 9/11 was an inside job. It was only a matter of time, of course, as people have dogged Clinton’s trail for weeks now as he shills his Bilderberger choice for decider-commander wife to mostly fawning masses at campaign stops.

“Police detained a protester at an early morning campaign stop by former President Bill Clinton,” reports Dan Kelley for the Caller Times. “The unidentified man had been holding a sign saying that 9/11 was in inside job. After Clinton finished his speech and was shaking hands with the crowd, the man began yelling at the former president, who was campaigning for his wife Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential run.”

That’s when the flatfoots stepped in. But not before a patriotic American and defender of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights grabbed the man’s sign and ripped it in half. “The man began screaming at officers, asking them to protect his First Amendment rights. Four police officers then yanked the man from the crowd. He was later placed in handcuffs and led away to a patrol car.”

Big mistake, of course, as the cops are not here to protect the First Amendment or any other right for that matter. Cops, by and large, are here to write tickets for rolling stops and entertain themselves by tasering presumptuous students who ask the wrong questions of Skull and Bones members holding court.

As well, the man in question should have realized those of us who ask questions about 9/11 are on equal footing with a few square inches of dirt in the minds of police and former handpicked presidents. Asking for protection is akin to asking to be locked in a holding cell for a day or two.

“An officer at the scene said the man would be charged with disorderly conduct.”

The American Heritage Dictionary defines “disorderly conduct” as an “offense involving disturbance of the public peace and decency.”

Naturally, asking Clinton about 9/11 is nothing less than a “disturbance of the public peace and decency,” as mere commoners are not allowed to mention such things, not any more.

I mean, how dare we?