Saturday, December 30, 2006

Madrid blast 'ends Eta ceasefire'

Madrid blast 'ends Eta ceasefire'

Basque separatist group Eta have carried out a car bomb attack at a Madrid airport ending a ceasefire, the Spanish government has announced.
At least four people were injured in the blast in the car park of terminal four at Barajas Airport.

"It is an attack which breaks nine months without violent actions by Eta," said Spain's interior minister.

He said the prime minister would stress later that "violence and dialogue are incompatible in democracy".

Officials said Eta had made a call to claim the attack - but the Spanish government has not called off peace talks with the separatists.

The Eta ceasefire was declared in March after four decades of violence aimed at creating an independent Basque state in the north of the country.

Pressure grows

The bomb exploded at about 0900 (0800 GMT), causing minor injuries to four people including two police officers and a taxi driver, emergency services said.

The authorities had time to evacuate the area, but one person is still missing. The bomb significantly damaged the car park, sending a huge plume of smoke over the terminal.


ETA TIMELINE
1959: Eta founded
1968: Eta kills San Sebastian secret police chief Meliton Manzanas, its first victim
1973: PM Luis Carrero Blanco assassinated
1978: Political wing Herri Batasuna formed
1980: 118 people killed in bloodiest year
Sept 1998: Indefinite ceasefire
Nov 1999: End of ceasefire, followed by more bomb attacks in January and February 2000
Dec 2001: EU declares Eta a terrorist organisation
March 2003: Batasuna banned by Supreme Court
May 2003: Two police killed in Eta's last deadly attack
Nov 2005: 56 alleged Eta activists on trial in the largest prosecution of its kind
March 2006: Eta declares permanent ceasefire


Flights in and out of terminal four have been halted, and there is chaos at the other three terminals, officials say.

"It is an attack, I repeat, which breaks the permanent cease-fire which Eta ordered nearly nine months ago," Interior Minister Alfredo Perez Rubalcaba told a news conference.

He said Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero would "do something more extensive" when he addresses the country at about 1700 GMT on Saturday.

"It is a brief political assessment," Mr Rubalcaba said, "in line with something which you have often heard me say, which it is appropriate to repeat today more categorically than ever.

"It is that violence is incompatible with dialogue in any democracy... And that is a rule which the government will firmly maintain."

In March, Eta declared that it was permanently ending an armed campaign that has killed more than 800 people.

In response, Mr Zapatero announced the beginning of talks with the militant separatist group, although discussions have not officially started.

Victims' associations and the conservative opposition are renewing their demands that the government immediately call off the peace process, says the BBC's Danny Wood in Madrid.


Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/europe/6219431.stm

Published: 2006/12/30 13:38:53 GMT

Saddam Hussein executed in Iraq

Saddam Hussein executed in Iraq

In a last act of defiance Saddam Hussein refused to wear a hood

The former Iraqi leader, Saddam Hussein, has been hanged in northern Baghdad for crimes against humanity.
Iraqi state TV showed images of Saddam Hussein going to the gallows before dawn in a building his intelligence services once used for executions.

However the moment of his execution was not shown. Pictures of his body wrapped in a shroud were later broadcast on TV.

A representative of the prime minister and a Sunni Muslim cleric were among a group of Iraqis present.

Saddam Hussein were sentenced to death by an Iraqi court on 5 November after a year-long trial over the killings of 148 Shias from the town of Dujail in the 1980s.

In a statement, Iraq's Prime Minister, Nouri Maliki, said the execution had closed a dark chapter in Iraq's history.

"Justice, in the name of the people, has carried out the death sentence against the criminal Saddam, who faced his fate like all tyrants, frightened and terrified during a hard day which he did not expect," it read.

Holding Koran

A small group of Iraqis witnessed the execution in a spartan concrete-lined chamber at an Iraqi compound known by the Americans as Camp Justice in the suburb of Khadimiya.


We took him to the gallows and he was saying some few slogans. He was very, very, very, broken
Mouwafak al-Rubaie
Iraq National Security Adviser


They watched as a judge read out the sentence to Saddam Hussein, 69. The former Iraqi leader was carrying a copy of the Koran and asked for it to be given to a friend.

Footage broadcast later on Iraqi state TV showed a subdued Saddam Hussein being led to gallows by a group of masked men.

He was dressed in a white shirt and dark overcoat, rather than prison garb.

Saddam Hussein was led up onto the gallows platform and a dark piece of cloth placed around his neck, followed by the noose.

When the hangman stepped forward to put the hood over his head, Saddam Hussein made it clear he wanted to die without it.

The hanging itself was not broadcast.


They felt very proud as they saw their father facing his executioners so bravely
Spokeswoman for Saddam Hussein's daughters


The execution procedure took just a few minutes.

Iraqi National Security Adviser Mouwafak al-Rubaie, who witnessed the execution, told the BBC that the former leader went to the gallows quietly:

"We took him to the gallows and he was saying some few slogans. He was very, very, very, broken."

In other developments:



US troops and Iraqi security forces are put on high alert and security is increased at US embassies around the world

Three car bombs go off in quick succession in a mainly Shia Baghdad district, killing at least 25 people and injuring 65 others, Iraqi officials say

A bomb explodes in a market place in the mainly Shia city of Kufa, in southern Iraq, killing at least 31 people and injuring 25

The US military says that a US soldier was killed by a roadside bomb in Baghdad on Friday and three marines died from wounds suffered in combat in Iraq's western Anbar province

Images of Saddam Hussein's body were also broadcast on Iraqi TV, still dressed in his overcoat and wrapped in a white sheet.


His body is reported to have been flown by helicopter to an unknown location.

Sources close to the Iraqi prime minister said the body would be buried in Iraq, but would not reveal where.

Saddam Hussein's daughters Raghad and Rana had earlier asked that their father be buried temporarily in Yemen.

According to their spokeswoman, Rasha Oudeh, the two women watched their father's final moments on TV.

"They felt very proud as they saw their father facing his executioners so bravely, standing up," Ms Oudeh said. "They pray that his soul rests in peace."

Mixed reaction

News of Saddam Hussein's execution was announced on state-run Iraqiya television, as patriotic music and images of national monuments were played out.


It is an important milestone on Iraq's course to becoming a democracy that can govern, sustain, and defend itself
US President George W Bush

It initially said his half-brother Barzan al-Tikriti and Iraq's former chief judge Awad Hamed al-Bandar were also hanged, but Mr Rubaie later said only Saddam Hussein was hanged.

The others will be executed some time after the Eid festival ends next week, he said.

Other Arab TV stations aired live footage of the sunrise over Baghdad's Firdous Square, where US Marines pulled down a statue of Saddam Hussein, after he was deposed in April 2003.

There were jubilant scenes in the Baghdad Shia stronghold of Sadr City, with people dancing in the streets and sounding their car horns, and in the southern city of Basra.

But in Saddam Hussein's hometown of Tikrit, where a curfew was imposed, the news sparked protests from supporters.

Protests were also reported in Samarra and Ramadi.

'Held to account'

US President George W Bush hailed the execution as "an important milestone" on the road to building an Iraqi democracy, but warned it would not end the deadly violence there.


I feel saddened by the death of Saddam, not because he deserved to live but because it is taking place under US occupation of Iraq
Nafeesa Zafar, Pakistan


He said: "It is a testament to the Iraqi people's resolve to move forward after decades of oppression that, despite his terrible crimes against his own people, Saddam Hussein received a fair trial.

"It is an important milestone on Iraq's course to becoming a democracy that can govern, sustain, and defend itself, and be an ally in the War on Terror."

UK Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett welcomed the fact that Saddam Hussein had been tried by an Iraqi court "for at least some of the appalling crimes he committed" and said "he has now been held to account".

France called on Iraqis to "look towards the future and work towards reconciliation and national unity".


Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/6218485.stm

Thursday, December 28, 2006

Giuliani vs. Hillary '08!

Giuliani takes first step in presidential bid - Full Story USA Today


WASHINGTON (AP) — Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, a Republican moderate who achieved near-mythic popularity for his handling of the Sept. 11 attacks, has taken the first step in a 2008 presidential bid.

The man once dubbed "America's mayor" filed papers Friday in New York to create the Rudy Giuliani Presidential Exploratory Committee Inc. A copy of the document was obtained by The Associated Press.

Building a North American Community - NAU Here we come!

Building a North American Community - CFR Report



Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America

Department of Homeland Security violated privacy

AP

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) admitted it violated the Privacy Act two years ago by obtaining more commercial data about US airline passengers than it had announced it would.

Seventeen months ago, the government accountability office (GAO), Congress' auditing arm, reached the same conclusion -- the department's transportation security administration (TSA) "did not fully disclose to the public its use of personal information in its fall 2004 privacy notices as required by the Privacy Act."

Even so, in a report on Friday on the testing of TSA's Secure Flight domestic air passenger screening program, the DHS privacy office acknowledged TSA did not comply with the law.

Instead, the privacy office said: "TSA announced one testing program, but conducted an entirely different one."

In a 40-word, separate sentence, the report noted that federal programs that collect personal data that can identify Americans "are required to be announced in Privacy Act system notices and privacy impact assessments."

TSA spokesman Christopher White noted the GAO's earlier conclusions and said: "TSA has already implemented or is in the process of implementing each of the DHS privacy office recommendations."

Friday's report reinforced concerns on Capitol Hill.

"This further documents the cavalier way the Bush administration treats Americans' privacy," said Senator Patrick Leahy, the democrat who is set to become Senate Judiciary Committee chairman next month.

"With this database program, first they ignored the Privacy Act, and now, two years later, they still have a hard time admitting it," he said.

The privacy office said TSA announced in fall 2004 it would acquire passenger name records of people who flew domestically in June 2004. Airline passenger name records include the flyer's name, address, itinerary, form of payment, history of one-way travel, contact phone number, seating location and even requests for special meals.

The public notices said TSA would try to match the passenger names with names on watch lists of terrorists and criminals.

But they also said the passenger records would be compared with unspecified commercial data about Americans in an effort to see if the passenger data was accurate. It assured the public that TSA would not receive commercial data used by contractors to conduct that part of the tests.

But the contractor, EagleForce, used data obtained from commercial data collection companies Acxiom, Insight America and Qsent to fill in missing information in the passenger records and then sent the enhanced records back to TSA on CDs for comparison with watch lists.

Eventually, the three companies supplied EagleForce with 191 million records, though many were duplicates.

This was "contrary to the express statements in the fall privacy notices about the Secure Flight program," the privacy office concluded.

"EagleForce's access to the commercial data amounted to access of the data by TSA," it said.

Somalia's Stability Lies In Ethiopia's Hands

article

As Ethiopian-backed government troops move in to the Somali capital Mogadishu, the anarchic country's fate hangs in the balance and will depend on Ethiopia's post-war strategy.

Ethiopia has said it will withdraw its forces within a few days once its mission - to protect itself and the Somali transitional government from terror attacks - is complete.

In a crisis reminiscent of the US debacle in Iraq, Ethiopia has inserted itself into the conflict with no real plan to return stability to the country it has shaken up over the past week.

The country has definitely proved its military might by sending fighter jets to attack two main airports and sweeping most of the country clear of Union of Islamic Courts (UIC) fighters. But without a clear direction, chaos could ensue.

"As in Iraq, we've seen rapid military success in the early stages but there doesn't seem to be a road map for the post-war phase," said Matt Bryden, a consultant with the International Crisis Group, a Belgium-based conflict analysis think-tank.

"The risk is that if Ethiopia can't consolidate its victory politically, then south Somalia will return to the precarious situation with the same warlordism and anarchy it had in the first place," he said.

Somalia has been without strong central rule since the 1991 ouster of a dictator plunged the country into lawlessness. Clan-based warlords fought ruthless battles against each other for years, until the UIC came to power this year, bringing some sense of security to the Horn of Africa nation.

According to Bryden, Ethiopia has accomplished the goal it set out for itself.

It has effectively dismantled the UIC, with the Islamist group dissolving itself before the arrival of the joint Ethiopian-Somali government troops and others fleeing to southern Somalia, of which the Islamists retain control.

To that end, Ethiopia has ended a proxy war between it and its foe, neighbouring Eritrea, which has been accused of sending arms and fighters to support the UIC militia. Ethiopia and Eritrea fought a brutal 1998-2000 war over a disputed border region, which is now monitored by a UN force.

And while Ethiopia has no real interest in seeing through a political solution to the instability, Bryden said, the consequences could be serious for its administration and its national security if it doesn't.

Jihadists, some with ties to al-Qaeda, are said to have entered the country, and the leader of the UIC, Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys, is on a UN and US terrorist list.

While UIC forces have been retreating over the last couple of days, the group has threatened to begin a guerrilla war against Ethiopia which could include suicide bombings.

And if Ethiopia has a premature pull-out, the government forces will have a hard time quelling any violence that flares up.

For now, the government is as powerless as it has been since its creation by the international community in 2004. While the joint Ethiopian-government troops effortlessly regained the country from the Islamists, Bryden said the government soldiers were no more than passengers on Ethiopian vehicles.

"There is a risk that the government will be unable to govern and that there will be instability. That risk is very real," Bryden said.

In order to secure the country's future, the same solution that has been suggested for months remains: the government needs to forge a power-sharing agreement with the Hawiyeh clan, which largely made up the UIC and somehow get credible members into the administration.

"If the transitional government could actually stabilize itself than the Iraq trap would be avoided," Bryden said.

With so many futile attempts at doing so, the Ethiopian intervention seems to be a flawed solution to an ongoing crisis.

Saddam Hussein's Baath party threatens to retaliate if their leader is executed

ap

Saddam Hussein's Baath Party threatened Wednesday to retaliate if the ousted Iraqi leader is executed, warning in an Internet posting it would target U.S. interests anywhere.

The statement appeared on a Web site known to represent the Baath, which was disbanded after U.S.-led forces overthrew Saddam in 2003. The site is believed to be run from Yemen, where a number of exiled members of the party are based.

On Tuesday, Iraq's highest court rejected Saddam's appeal against a conviction and death sentence for the killing of 148 people who were detained after an attempt to assassinate in Dujail, northern Iraq, in 1982. The court said the former president should be hanged within 30 days.

"Our party warns again of the consequences of executing Mr. President and his comrades," the statement said.

"The Baath and the resistance are determined to retaliate, with all means and everywhere, to harm America and its interests if it commits this crime," the statement added, referring to Baath fighters as "the resistance."

"The American Administration will be held responsible for any harm inflicted on the president because the United States is the decision-maker (in Iraq) and not the puppet Iraqi government."

The statement said that if the execution takes place, it would be impossible for the Baath to take part in any prospective negotiations with U.S. and Iraqi officials to reduce the violence in Iraq.

Saddam's defense lawyers, who are based in Amman, called on Arab governments and the United Nations to intervene to stop the execution.

"Otherwise, all may be participating in what is going on, either actually or due to their silence in face of the crimes, which are being committed in Iraq in the name of democracy," the lawyers said in a statement in English that was e-mailed to The Associated Press bureau.

The statement, signed by "the Defense Committee for President Saddam Hussein," said the court's rejection of Saddam's appeal was part of the "continued shedding of pure Iraqi blood by the current regime in Iraq, which (is) directly connected with the American occupation."

One of Saddam's counsel, Najib al-Nueimi, a former justice minister in the Gulf state of Qatar, said it was now time for Saddam's family to appeal to Iraqi President Jalal Talabani.

"The defense team has exhausted all the legal channels to appeal this decision, so it is up to the president's family to present an appeal for clemency to the current president, asking him not to sign the execution papers," al-Nueimi said, speaking in a phone interview from Qatar.

Saddam's wife, Sajda, lives in Qatar, and his daughter Raghad, who has supervised his defense team, lives in Amman.

Asked whether the family would appeal to Talabani, al-Nueimi would only say: "It's up to them."

Courts Side With NSA On Wiretaps

new york sun

Defense lawyers who had hoped that the public disclosure a year ago of the National Security Agency's wiretapping program would yield information favorable to their clients are being rebuffed by the federal judiciary, which in a series of unusually consistent rulings has rejected efforts by terrorism suspects to access the records.

In at least 17 criminal cases, federal district judges nominated to the federal bench by presidents Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Clinton, and George W. Bush have ruled against requests to force the government to tell defendants, most accused of terrorism-related crimes, whether the NSA eavesdropped on them without a court warrant.

The rulings indicate that even as public support for the war in Iraq has eroded in polls and as the NSA program has come under criticism from congressional Democrats, and even some Republicans, federal judges may be a bulwark that the Bush administration can rely on to defer to at least some aspects of its wartime policies.

The judges' decisions have come after defense attorneys filed motions requesting access to relevant surveillance intercepts that the government obtained without a warrant. Defense attorneys claim they are entitled to such information and that evidence obtained from warrantless wiretaps is tainted and inadmissible at trial. In many, but not all instances, the motions were filed after a conviction.

Individually, the judges' orders, often very brief and rarely providing explanations, indicate little. Taken together, however, they signal that the judges are unwilling to permit defense attorneys to use prosecutions to force disclosures about the program.

The legality of the NSA program is being litigated in several civil lawsuits across the country. In one case, a district judge in Detroit, Anna Diggs Taylor, ruled in August that the program was unconstitutional, a decision that the government has appealed. Legal observers dispute whether even a ruling by the Supreme Court that the program is unconstitutional would lead to the overturning of criminal convictions in which the program played a role in securing evidence or targeting the defendants.

In every instance, the Justice Department's policy is to refuse to say publicly whether the NSA program was involved in a case, because denying its role in one case but refusing to deny its role elsewhere could disclose classified information, according to public government court filings. Rather, in response to defense motions, the Justice Department has filed secret documents with the court that are not supplied to defense lawyers.

"There is a veil of secrecy over these parts of the proceedings," said one attorney, Marvin Miller, who filed such a motion on behalf of Ali Asad Chandia, who was convicted in Alexandria, Va., of aiding a terrorist organization in Pakistan.

Defense attorneys say they are frustrated that judges are accepting these secret briefs from the government.

"Whatever the government is saying in these secret ex parte in camera filings, it is sure clamming up a lot of judges," said attorney Jeanne Baker, who represents Adham Amin Hassoun, a co-defendant of "dirty bomb" suspect Jose Padilla.

Speculation abounds among attorneys over just what the Justice Department is saying in the secret briefs.

Some defense attorneys suggest that the government's ex parte briefs may contain a simple yes-or-no answer as to whether a specific defendant was targeted by the NSA program. Another defense attorney, Jill Shellow-Lavine, speculates that the size of the program may prevent the government from stating whether a particular defendant was the subject of the surveillance.

A former Justice Department official says that the government probably declines to give any answers in its secret filings.

"There is no basis to assume than the government is making defendant-specific disclosures," David Rivkin, who served in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations, said. "The far more likely scenario is that the government is telling the relevant judges that the classified program has nothing to do with this prosecution."

Defense attorneys say the willingness of judges to accept secret briefings puts them in an unfair position.

"It short-circuits the adversary system, and it prevents the issues from being litigated," a lawyer who has filed a motion for disclosure regarding the NSA program, Malick Ghachem, said. "I haven't found a single judge so far who has been willing to take a serious look at this or at least let the defendants know they are taking a serious look at it."

Defense attorneys acknowledge that these motions for disclosure are made routinely, even without any evidence to suggest that their clients were targeted by the NSA program.

Still, even in cases in which the NSA program is believed to have played a role, it is not clear that judges would rule any differently. Officials in the Bush administration have credited the NSA program with helping uncover the terrorist plot of an Ohio truck driver, Iyman Faris, to topple the Brooklyn Bridge, according to a New York Times report. In October a federal judge in Alexandria, Va., Leonie Brinkema, declined Faris's request for government documents about the NSA program's role in the case. Last month, Judge Brinkema upheld Faris's guilty plea from 2003, ruling that Faris did not have standing to bring his challenge even if "electronic surveillance" had first led the government to him.

In only one case has a federal appeals court looked at the relationship of the NSA program to criminal prosecutions. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Va., in April remanded a separate case to Judge Brinkema, questioning whether the government possessed "undisclosed intercepts" that should have been turned over. The case involved a Muslim cleric, Ali al-Timimi, who was found guilty last year of encouraging Muslims to join the Taliban's war efforts.

Timimi's attorney, Jonathan Turley, said he believes that NSA intercepts may contain exculpatory evidence that could have benefited Timimi, rather than incriminating evidence used to target him.

A court filing by the Justice Department in the case against Lynne Stewart, the New York lawyer who was convicted of criminally helping her terrorist client communicate with his followers, listed 17 criminal cases in which judges have denied motions for disclosure about the NSA program. The New York Sun reviewed 14 of them. In those orders, the judges, excluding Judge Brinkema, did not state any reason for denying the defense motions, except to indicate that they had considered the secret briefs of the government. In one written order, a judge implied that his willingness to sentence a defendant without further hearings was on the condition that the government's secret brief said no evidence came from the NSA program.

Iran has ‘appropriate tools’ to confront Western pressure (Roundup)

m&c news

Tehran - Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani said Wednesday that Iran had the ‘appropriate tools’ to confront Western pressure in the dispute over its nuclear programme.

‘If they (Western countries) think they can put pressure on us, then they should know that other countries also have appropriate tools to confront such pressures,’ said Larijani, who is also secretary of the National Security Council, in remarks reported by ISNA news agency.

Larijani did not evaluate further but Oil Minister Kazem Vaziri- Hamaneh had said Tuesday that Iran would not rule out using oil as a weapon following a recent decision by the United Nations Security Council to impose sanctions on the Islamic state over its nuclear programmes.

On accelerating work on nuclear programmes as called for in a parliamentary bill approved earlier Wednesday, Larijani said that if Iran’s right to civilian nuclear energy was not recognized, Tehran would continue its work.

‘The IAEA has already been informed of our operations and nothing has been concealed,’ the nuclear chief said referring to Iran’s announcement that it would soon install 3000 centrifuges for uranium enrichment.

The UN resolution was approved because the United States wanted to humiliate Iran, Larijani said, adding that ‘contrary to the US aim, such moves have just made us stronger.’

On the parliament’s nuclear bill, he said the National Security Council had formed a committee to study the course to be taken.

The Iranian parliament unanimously approved a bill on revising cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and to accelerate work on nuclear energy projects.

Detailed evaluation of the issue is to be left however to the National Security Council.

According to the Iranian constitution, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has the final say on all state affairs, including the nuclear issue, and can overrule governmental and parliamentary decisions.

Observers consider the bill as a more a symbolic than a binding gesture as the nuclear issue is regarded in Iran as a ’state matter’, that is decided at the highest level in line with national interests.

The Iranian legislation came after the UN Security Council on December 23 passed a resolution calling on governments to ‘prevent the supply, sale or transfer, directly or indirectly from their territories … of all items, materials, equipment, goods and technology which could contribute to Iran’s enrichment-related, reprocessing or heavy water-related activities, or to the development of nuclear weapon delivery systems.’

Long fuse of dollar crisis will be lit in 2007

Guardian Unlimited Business

In January 1985 the pound was plunging towards one dollar and the British prime minister telephoned her friend President Reagan for support.

Margaret Thatcher may have believed that "you can't buck the market" but when she saw the pound threatening to fall below $1 her eyes did not focus on the greenback. She saw red.

Thanks to a concerted effort by central banks to prop up the British currency, the pound was kept above that politically humiliating level.

The Iron Lady knew a virility symbol when she saw one, and Reagan helped her to preserve it.

There have been no corresponding telephone calls from Tony Blair to George Bush recently as the pound has approached, but not quite reached, $2.

A $2 pound is not an obvious embarrassment to Britain. Indeed, a $2 pound is, superficially (as often happens in the macho world) one hell of a virility symbol - for the UK, that is; not so much for the US.

Financial markets will no doubt quieten down over the holidays, as the key decision-makers take a break - although in the world of the BlackBerry one can never be quite sure.

But 2007 is surely going to be the year when the long fuse of the dollar crisis is finally lit, and people wake up to the implications of the necessary "rebalancing" of the world economy.

Or, rather, to what I suspect may be a very distorted movement in exchange rates which could lead not so much to rebalancing as to a different form of imbalance.

Indeed the beginnings of new distortions are already with us.

Behind the government of Thailand's attempt to impose financial sanctions on inflows of foreign currencies last week lay understandable concern at the impact the falling dollar was having on the Thai baht, which was manifesting the kind of virility referred to above.

A strong currency in fact signifies weakness for the competitiveness of exports, via its impact on prices or profits or both.

For despite all the publicity given to the supposedly low-profile efforts of Washington to induce a serious revaluation of the Chinese yuan, the adjustment promises to be a characteristically long Chinese march.

The yuan remains seriously undervalued, thereby helping to foment protectionist sentiment in the US and elsewhere, while the Japanese yen has been hitting new lows against the euro.

The real pasting of the dollar's recent decline has been taken by the smaller Asian currencies such as the Thai baht.

It is no wonder the Thai government and central bank are worried.

The outcry, and impact on the stock market, have forced them to back-pedal, as if they were outcasts.

Yet the principle of what they were trying to do resembles what the Swiss, those paragons of financial rectitude, were forced to resort to occasionally in the late 1960s and early 1970s - that is, attempting to discourage unwanted inflows via financial disincentives.

Those were in the far off days of the Bretton Woods system. In a speech in Australia Mervyn King, the governor of the Bank of England repeated his criticisms of the inadequacy of the Bretton Woods institutions such as the International Monetary Fund in circumstances such as these, when the US has been running current balance of payments deficits of more than 3% (and now 7%) since 1999 and "imbalances can apparently persist almost indefinitely".

Mr King's reminders also evoke memories of the 1970s with his point that the combined trade surplus of Opec, thanks to the oil price bonanza (in part caused by Chinese demand) is likely, at some $400bn, to be well over twice the estimated Chinese trade surplus of $150bn this year.

Mr King has also complained about the inadequacy of the Group of Seven, something of which he has first hand experience, since he is one of the G7 central bankers.

He says: "The inability of the G7 to deal with the major spill-over effects in the world economy has become more and more evident.

"Adding new members, even if they were willing to join, is not the answer." (This is an ex cathedra statement; the governor does not say why it is not the answer).

The answer, he tells us, is "to use the IMF as [a] flexible forum to bring the relevant group of countries together to handle issues as and when they arise".

Mr King also argues that the IMF should concentrate on macroeconomic issues and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development on micro ones. But this would surely be a pity.

The OECD has a good record at macroeconomic analysis, and Mr King's own criticism of recent IMF macroeconomic analysis (that institution's apparent failure to stress the importance of the impact of Chinese demand on the price of oil) suggests that the continuation of competition in analysis from the OECD might not be a bad thing.

The thing about the G7 (or an expanded version) is that it has, or could have, potential political clout.

The IMF is a collection of bureaucrats, with little political authority.

But it is good that Mr King is stirring up the debate, and it is interesting that some observers believe he sees himself as the natural man to run a beefed up IMF when his term at the Bank of England (as a member of an ineffective G7!) comes to end.

Meanwhile, my bet is that with so many holders of dollars getting worried (they only have to stop accumulating them to cause mayhem in the markets) 2007 is going to be an interesting year for the European Central Bank, as it decides how to cope if the euro, like the Thai baht, but on a much bigger scale, is driven too high for comfort.

It could, to coin a phrase, be "brutal".

Wednesday, December 27, 2006

Arrested Iranians linked to Iraq attacks

U.S. Says Captured Iranians Can Be Linked to Attacks - Full Story NY Times


"BAGHDAD, Dec. 26 — The American military said Tuesday that it had credible evidence linking Iranians and their Iraqi associates, detained here in raids last week, to criminal activities, including attacks against American forces. Evidence also emerged that some detainees had been involved in shipments of weapons to illegal armed groups in Iraq."

"Some Iraqis questioned the timing of the arrests, suggesting that the Bush administration had political motives. The arrests were made just days before the United Nations Security Council passed a resolution imposing sanctions on Iran for its refusal to suspend uranium enrichment."

Troop surge? or Divide and Conquer?

Biden Opposes a Troop Increase in Iraq, Foreshadowing a Fight With the Bush Administration - Full Story Washington Post

By HELENE COOPER

WASHINGTON, Dec. 26 — Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware, the incoming chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, on Tuesday rejected a troop increase for Iraq, foreshadowing what could be a contentious fight between the Bush administration and Congress.

"One plan under consideration is to send an additional 30,000 troops to Iraq in a bid to restore order. “I totally oppose this surging of additional American troops into Baghdad,” Mr. Biden said. “It’s contrary to the overwhelming body of informed opinion, both inside and outside the administration.”

"Mr. Biden, who said he planned to run for president in 2008, made his critique during a teleconference call with reporters. He continued to press his proposal for a partitioning of Iraq into three autonomous states — controlled by Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds — to be sustained with what he called an equitable distribution of the country’s oil wealth."

Iran to 'revise' nuke cooperation

CNN StoryTEHRAN, Iran (Reuters) -- Iran's parliament passed a bill on Wednesday obliging the government to "revise" the level of its cooperation with the IAEA nuclear watchdog after the United Nations approved sanctions on Tehran over its atomic programme.

The U.N. Security Council voted unanimously on Saturday to impose sanctions on Iran's trade in sensitive nuclear materials and technology, in an attempt to stop uranium enrichment work that could produce material that could be used in bombs.

"The government is obliged to revise its cooperation level with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)," said the bill, which was read out during a parliament session broadcast live on state radio.

The bill also obliges President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's government to "accelerate Iran's nuclear activities", in defiance of the council's calls to halt nuclear enrichment, which the West fears is a cover to build atomic weapons. Iran denies the charge.

The hardline Guardian Council, a watchdog body, swiftly approved the bill. Deputy Parliament Speaker Mohammad Reza Bahonar said it was the first time since the 1979 Islamic revolution that the council approved a bill in 5 minutes.

The bill will take effect 15 days after being signed by the president, who indicated on Sunday that the resolution, which he said was a "piece of torn paper", would alter Iran's relationship with the IAEA.

The bill stopped short of approving demands by some conservative parliamentarians who wanted a tougher line against the IAEA and end its inspections of atomic facilities.

Parliament Speaker Gholamali Haddadadel said the bill gave the government authority to decide if it wanted the nuclear standoff to be resolved through political means in the framework of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

"This bill is a warning to the government not to put the fate of Iran totally in the hands of the IAEA and react in proportion with imposed pressures," he said.

"The government's reaction to international pressures could also be pulling out of the NPT," Haddadadel said.

Some analysts disagreed, saying under Iran's system of clerical rule, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has the last say on state matters, not the president.

"This law does not give any additional power to the government than what it already has ... Iran's supreme leader has the final say over the nuclear issue," political analyst Saeed Leylaz said.

Khamenei has previously said Iran would not yield to pressure. He has issued a religious decree, saying that making, stockpiling or using nuclear weapons was against Islamic beliefs, the official IRNA news agency reported in August 2005.

However, some politicians say the conservative-dominated parliament wanted to send a message to the world that hardliners in Iran could force the government to adopt a tougher line in its defiant stance.

Iran in February ended voluntary implementation of the Additional Protocol to the NPT that allowed for short notice IAEA inspections of its nuclear sites, after being referred to the U.N. Security Council.

Some hardline commentators in Iran, who are strongly opposed to Western interference in the country's affairs, have suggested that Iran should pull out of the NPT.

"Iran's membership to the NPT is ridiculous now," said Hussein Shariatmadari, chief editor of the Kayhan newspaper.

Copyright 2006 Reuters. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Find this article at:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/12/27/iran.parliament.reut/index.html

Venezuela mulls euro oil switch

Venezuela has expressed interest in an Iranian move to ask buyers to pay for oil in euros rather than US dollars.

The oil-rich nation said it planned to see if a similar scheme could be introduced to its crude exports.

Iran, the world's fourth-biggest oil producer, has already asked customers to pay for its oil in euros because of the current weakness of the dollar.

Although the dollar is the currency in which oil is usually traded, it has been falling in value against the euro.

Strained relations

The US currency tumbled to 20-month lows against the single European currency earlier this month.

Iran still prices its oil in dollars, but currently receives payment for 57% of its crude exports in euros, according to the National Iranian Oil Company.

Venezuela's energy minister Rafael Ramirez described the Iranian scheme as "very interesting".

Venezuela and Iran, which have strained political relations with Washington, are both members of oil producers' cartel Opec.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/business/6202791.stm

Published: 2006/12/22 10:30:38 GMT

US Sending more troops to the Gulf

US to send more troops to Gulf - BBC

The Pentagon is expected to send up to 3,300 soldiers to Kuwait in the New Year as Washington considers a policy shift in Iraq, officials say.
If confirmed, the order would be the first to the region signed by Defence Secretary Robert Gates, who has just been on a fact-finding mission to Iraq.

A recent report commissioned by the White House urged a temporary troop build-up to quell increasing violence.

President Bush last week conceded that the US was not winning in Iraq.

But it is still unclear which recommendations he intends to adopt from a report by the Iraq Survey Group, which issued recommendations on the way forward earlier this month.

Among dozens of suggestions, it said dialogue with Iran and Syria - which has been rejected - but also a short-term troop reinforcement to combat the violence and improve the training of Iraqi troops.

In recent weeks, attacks on US and Iraqi troops, as well as civilians, have reached their highest level since power was handed over to an interim Iraqi government in June 2004.

Mr Gates succeeded Donald Rumsfeld - who had been blamed for setbacks in tackling the Iraqi insurgency - as defence secretary earlier this month.

There are around 140,000 troops currently posted in Iraq, with a reserve force kept in neighbouring Kuwait for speedy deployment.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/americas/6211493.stm

Published: 2006/12/27 08:01:25 GMT

Electronic Tagging Of Humans

Dr Paul Singh

ARTICLE

The implantation of microchip in milching animals to check the misuse of bank loans and tracking the movement of wild animals by radio collars are very common now a days. But humans, in future, are also to be tagged for tracking their movements by imbedding a microchip in the body. This chip would be capable of transmitting data to a computer. The implantation technique in humans would open way to a numerous exciting applications in the field of medical sciences, bionics and human biometrics.

Dr Kelvin Warwick, Professor of Cybernetics, University of Reading, U.K., has been conducting research on artificial intelligence, control and robotics under Project Cyborg. In the first phase of project started in 1998, he got a microchip implantation in his forearm.All the neuro-signals between Dr Warwick’s brain and the body were transmitted, recorded and analysed by the computer. The signals received by a neural signal processor were digitised and then scanned on line for neural spike events. The motor neural signals detected by the array were able to move an intelligent artificial hand.

In a landmark event, scientists succeeded in moving the robot hand through on-line neural transmission.

In another experiment, the ultrasonic signals from an external source were received by Dr Warwick’s neural network and it enabled him move around a room blindfold without hitting the objects.

After three months of experimentation, no adverse effects in terms of rejection or infection were detected. The body had adapted and effectively strengthened the neural connection with tissues growing around the array and holding it firmly in place on the median nerve.

The electronic tagging of humans may provide immense applications from security and national identity management to the offender tagging. The uses of this technology are endless. It would provide a more permanent form of identification than a smart card.

In future, a silicon chip implant could provide a unique and permanent source of identification of a person, containing vast amount of data on an individual such as nationality, medical record and citizen data. This data would be retrieved easily and could be transmitted instantly to any place via internet.

In the financial sector, it would offer new ways in personal verification technology. It would help in curbing identity theft and prevent fraudulent access to banking and credit card accounts because for meeting any such transaction, the physical presence would be required.

In the fast changing world of information technology, the security is of paramount importance. In this field, the chip implant could integrate with advanced biometric devices such as retina scanners so as to enable the security managements safe access to buildings and government establishments.

In future, its use could be extended to consumer products such as cars, homes, ACs and mobile telephones.

Another important area of its use, would be in the countries where kidnapping for ransom is prevalent. The chip implant technology may provide an ideal solution.

Soon you can have a tracking chip implanted in your body. If you have lost your little baby on way to school or at the mall, the Babysitter will track his location from a jellybean-sized microchip implant discretely tucked under the collarbone.

The Constant Companion lets you keep a watchful eye on grandpa or grandma, even when you can’t be by their sides.

The Invisible Bodyguard offers you the freedom from the fear, and you can enjoy the fauna and foliage when eco-tourism takes you to kidnapping.

— The writer is Assoc. Prof. (Physics),CCS HAU, Hisar

Gates visited Baghdad to quell US soldiers mutiny in Anbar, US imminent attack on Ramadi soon

GLOBAL RESEARCH

According almoharrer newspaper quoting an Iraqi Military sources

Iraqi military sources told the newspaper that the reason that the American Secretary of Defense Robert Gates visited Baghdad urgently after two days he received his new post as a Defense Minister; is to extinguish a military mutiny carried out by American VI Battalion based in Anbar, after refusing to obey orders and prefer not to leave their base in Ramadi, the capital of Anbar province.

The sources pointed out that the US military base is exposed to daily heavy tactical attacks and attempts to storm the walls of the base by Iraqi resistance.

The sources added that Washington and specifically military, and intelligence in the American Congress, designedly sending Gates to rectify the mistakes that were made by his predecessor Rumsfeld and the most serious is; the American soldiers surrendering to the Iraqi resistance in Ramadi, which is what happened a month and a half before, while Iraqi resistance clashed with American patrol and managed to burn their military vehicle, US soldiers had no choice but to surrender and hope for safety.

With a help of an interpreter, the American POW explained they do not wish to fight the Iraqis and asked their captors to help them to smuggle them to Turkey across Mosul, Syria-Iraq borders in order to request political asylum.

Also reported by Qudspress that a mass exodus take place right now in the city of Ramadi after reports of an imminent American attack on the city following the visit of the American Secretary of Defense Robert Gates to Iraq.

The city filled with people searching for taxis and trucks to flee the city, bringing with them some simple belongings, especially after the American forces announced to the residents of Al Althelh and Al-Mulameen, the need to leave and evacuate their homes.

US forces took control of many houses in the area by force. It also closed schools in the city after electricity was lost completely. American forces also cut off water from the city center, with the continued armed confrontations between the American forces and Iraqi resistance in the city.

Meat and milk from cloning are safe, FDA scientists say

The study, which deems labeling unnecessary, signals the agency's receptiveness to formally approving such food.

LA TIMES

A long-awaited study by federal scientists concludes that meat and milk from cloned animals and their offspring is safe to eat and should be allowed to enter the food supply without any special labeling.

The finding is a strong signal that the Food and Drug Administration will endorse the use of cloning technology for cattle, goats and pigs when it publishes a key safety assessment intended to clear the way for formal approval of the products. That assessment is expected next week.

"All of the studies indicate that the composition of meat and milk from clones is within the compositional ranges of meat and milk consumed in the U.S.," the FDA scientists concluded in a report published in the Jan. 1 issue of the journal Theriogenology, which focuses on animal reproduction.

The study prompted a sharp reaction from some food safety advocates.

The FDA "has been trying to foist this bad science on us for several years," said Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of the nonprofit Center for Food Safety in Washington. "When there is so much concern among so many Americans, this is really a rush to judgment."

Many ranchers and dairy producers have already cloned animals for meat and milk production, but a voluntary moratorium initiated about five years ago by the FDA has largely kept those animals and their offspring out of grocery stores and restaurants.

However, ranchers say some animals taken to slaughterhouses in the last couple of years have undoubtedly been the offspring of clones. (The clones themselves are too precious to slaughter.)

"There's been lots and lots of them that went into the food chain," said Larry Coleman, who raises Limousin cattle in Charlo, Mont., and has made five clones of his prize bull, named First Down. He estimated that at least 10 of their offspring have wound up on dinner tables.

Since Dolly the sheep was cloned in 1996, agricultural scientists have imagined a time when they could dispense with the uncertainties of conventional breeding and make copies of their best animals.

Cows were cloned in 1998, pigs in 2000.

Consumers greeted the news with a combination of amazement and revulsion. Even experts conceded the technology provoked a certain "yuck" factor.

Cloning involves replacing an egg's nucleus with DNA from a prized animal. A tiny electric shock induces the egg to grow into a genetic copy of the original animal. Scientists often refer to clones as identical twins born at different times.

The FDA sees cloning as a natural extension of livestock reproductive technologies — such as artificial insemination and in vitro fertilization — that have become routine, said spokesman Doug Arbesfeld.

"It's the next step," Arbesfeld said. "We now have the technology to do things in petri dishes and much more inside the cell as opposed to the way breeders have done things for centuries."

Though cloning is expensive — Coleman paid $60,000 to clone First Down — producers have embraced it for the efficiencies it can bring to a farm or ranch. If a particular bull consistently sires strong offspring or a dairy cow is an unusually prolific milk producer, clones can multiply those advantages.

But a study released this month by the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology found that 64% of Americans were uncomfortable with animal cloning and 43% believed food from clones was unsafe.

Safety isn't the only concern among consumers. "It's not that they fear if they drink cloned milk, they're going to choke and die," said Carol Tucker Foreman, director of the Food Policy Institute at the Consumer Federation of America in Washington. Foreman said the primary issue was that the food should be labeled so consumers could avoid products derived from clones.

"I should have freedom not to spend my money and not to eat products that offend me," she said. "Some people only drink free-trade coffee. Others only choose organic food. Others choose halal or kosher food. This product, which causes great discomfort to a great number of people, goes on market with no labeling that enables me to make a choice."

The FDA scientists who wrote the paper, Larisa Rudenko and John C. Matheson, concluded there was no basis for labeling the meat and milk products or for treating them differently than other food.

"The U.S. food safety system is designed to screen meat and milk for hazards, regardless of the means by which the animals were derived," they wrote. "There is no science-based reason to apply additional safeguards."

The paper relies on dozens of studies from around the world, many of which examined genetic and health problems in cloned animals and the risks to animals that birth clones.

Though clones are more likely to die in utero or shortly after birth and to have birth defects, animals that are healthy and make it to adolescence face "no additional risk of illness or death," according to the report.

Two of the largest studies were provided by commercial clone producers Cyagra Inc. and ViaGen Inc. They tracked the growth of cloned and conventional animals and found no problems specific to clones. Clones are no more likely to get infections or diseases and "are virtually indistinguishable from their comparators," according to the FDA report.

The scientists also analyzed 13 studies on the composition of meat and milk from clones and their offspring. Vitamins, minerals, proteins, amino acids, fat, water and carbohydrate content were scrutinized, and no "nutritionally or toxicologically important differences" were found, they said.

"It's pretty clear from all of the research that a cloned animal or the offspring of a cloned animal is indistinguishable from an animal that's conventionally bred," said Arbesfeld, the FDA spokesman.

Skeptics remain unconvinced.

Kimbrell, of the Center for Food Safety, said too few animals had been cloned to conclude that they were safe to eat. He also called for more independent research provided by companies that are not in the cloning business.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and six other senators sent a letter last week to Health and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt, whose department includes the FDA, asking that he require a more thorough review of the available scientific data. Given consumer wariness about clones, the senators said, they were particularly concerned that allowing the sale of milk from cloned cows could "result in a 15% drop in purchase of U.S. dairy products."

Others insist there has been plenty of study and are eager for the FDA to proceed with the release of its draft risk assessment. An executive summary was released in 2003, but the full report has been stalled.

"I don't think every cloned animal and the offspring that have been produced are standing in a feedlot someplace waiting for the government to release this risk assessment analysis," said Don Coover, a veterinarian and rancher in Galesburg, Kan. "The industry has moved on."

Coover himself has sold about 30 offspring from a cloned bull. He has even eaten meat from a few of them.

"They taste like every other normal animal out there," he said, "because that's what they are."

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

Justice Dept. Database Stirs Privacy Fears

Size and Scope of the Interagency Investigative Tool Worry Civil Libertarians

WASHINGTON POST

The Justice Department is building a massive database that allows state and local police officers around the country to search millions of case files from the FBI, Drug Enforcement Administration and other federal law enforcement agencies, according to Justice officials.

The system, known as "OneDOJ," already holds approximately 1 million case records and is projected to triple in size over the next three years, Justice officials said. The files include investigative reports, criminal-history information, details of offenses, and the names, addresses and other information of criminal suspects or targets, officials said.

The database is billed by its supporters as a much-needed step toward better information-sharing with local law enforcement agencies, which have long complained about a lack of cooperation from the federal government.

But civil-liberties and privacy advocates say the scale and contents of such a database raise immediate privacy and civil rights concerns, in part because tens of thousands of local police officers could gain access to personal details about people who have not been arrested or charged with crimes.

The little-noticed program has been coming together over the past year and a half. It already is in use in pilot projects with local police in Seattle, San Diego and a handful of other areas, officials said. About 150 separate police agencies have access, officials said.

But in a memorandum sent last week to the FBI, U.S. attorneys and other senior Justice officials, Deputy Attorney General Paul J. McNulty announced that the program will be expanded immediately to 15 additional regions and that federal authorities will "accelerate . . . efforts to share information from both open and closed cases."

Eventually, the department hopes, the database will be a central mechanism for sharing federal law enforcement information with local and state investigators, who now run checks individually, and often manually, with Justice's five main law enforcement agencies: the FBI, the DEA, the U.S. Marshals Service, the Bureau of Prisons and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

Within three years, officials said, about 750 law enforcement agencies nationwide will have access.

In an interview last week, McNulty said the goal is to broaden the pool of data available to local and state investigators beyond systems such as the National Crime Information Center, the FBI-run repository of basic criminal records used by police and sheriff's deputies around the country.

By tapping into the details available in incident reports, interrogation summaries and other documents, investigators will dramatically improve their chances of closing cases, he said.

"The goal is that all of U.S. law enforcement will be able to look at each other's records to solve cases and protect U.S. citizens," McNulty said. "With OneDOJ, we will essentially hook them up to a pipe that will take them into its records."

McNulty and other Justice officials emphasize that the information available in the database already is held individually by the FBI and other federal agencies. Much information will be kept out of the system, including data about public corruption cases, classified or sensitive topics, confidential informants, administrative cases and civil rights probes involving allegations of wrongdoing by police, officials said.

But civil-liberties and privacy advocates -- many of whom are already alarmed by the proliferation of federal databases -- warn that granting broad access to such a system is almost certain to invite abuse and lead to police mistakes.

Barry Steinhardt, director of the Technology and Liberty Project at the American Civil Liberties Union, said the main problem is one of "garbage in, garbage out," because case files frequently include erroneous or unproved allegations.

"Raw police files or FBI reports can never be verified and can never be corrected," Steinhardt said. "That is a problem with even more formal and controlled systems. The idea that they're creating another whole system that is going to be full of inaccurate information is just chilling."

Steinhardt noted that in 2003, the FBI announced that it would no longer meet the Privacy Act's accuracy requirements for the National Crime Information Center, its main criminal-background-check database, which is used by 80,000 law enforcement agencies across the country.

"I look at this system and imagine it will raise many of the same questions that the whole information-sharing approach is raising across the government," said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a Washington-based group that has criticized many of the government's data-gathering policies.

"Information that's collected in the law enforcement realm can find [its way] into other arenas and be abused very easily," Rotenberg said.

McNulty and other officials said the data compiled under OneDOJ would be subject to the same civil-liberties and privacy oversight as any other Justice Department database. A coordinating committee within Justice will oversee the database and other information-sharing initiatives, according to McNulty's memo.

Gene Voegtlin, legislative counsel for the Arlington-based International Association of Chiefs of Police, said his group welcomes any initiatives to share more data with local law enforcement agencies.

"The working partnership between the states and the feds has gotten much better than the pre-9/11 era," Voegtlin said. "But we're still overcoming a lot of issues, both functional and organizational . . . so we're happy to see DOJ taking positive steps in that area."

Iranians arrested in Iraq!

Tehran Assails U.S. Arrests of Iranians in Iraq Raids - Full Story NY Times

By NAZILA FATHI
Published: December 26, 2006

"TEHRAN, Dec. 25 — Iran’s Foreign Ministry on Monday condemned the arrests of several Iranians by American forces in Iraq last week and warned that the arrests could have “unpleasant consequences.”

Report rebukes FBI on Oklahoma City probe - Agency failed to follow leads about other suspects, panel says - Full Story MSNBC



The Associated Press
Updated: 10:13 p.m. ET Dec 24, 2006
WASHINGTON - The FBI failed to fully investigate information suggesting other suspects may have helped Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols with the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, allowing questions to linger more than a decade after the deadly attack, a congressional inquiry concludes.

The House International Relations investigative subcommittee will release the findings of its two-year review as early as Wednesday, declaring there is no conclusive evidence of a foreign connection to the attack but far too many unanswered questions remain.

The subcommittee's report will conclude there is no doubt McVeigh and Nichols were the main perpetrators, and it discloses for the first time that Nichols confirmed to House investigators he participated in the robbery of an Arkansas gun dealer that provided the proceeds for the attack.

There have long been questions about that robbery because the FBI concluded McVeigh was in another state at the time it occurred.

The report also sharply criticizes the FBI for failing to be curious enough to pursue credible information that foreign or U.S. citizens may have had contact with Nichols or McVeigh and could have assisted their plot.

"We did our best with limited resources, and I think we moved the understanding of this issue forward a couple of notches even though important questions remain unanswered," Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., the subcommittee chairman, said in an interview with The Associated Press.

Sharpest words
Rohrabacher's subcommittee saved its sharpest words for the Justice Department, saying officials there exhibited a mindset of thwarting congressional oversight and did not assist the investigation fully.

The report rebukes the FBI for not fully pursuing leads suggesting other suspects may have provided support to McVeigh and Nichols before their truck bomb killed 168 people in the main federal building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995.

The report says the inadequacy of the bureau's work was exposed two years ago when some bombing evidence overlooked for 10 years was discovered in a home linked to Nichols that had been searched repeatedly by agents.

FBI spokesman Richard Kolko said Sunday, "Having not yet read the report, it would be inappropriate to comment on its contents."

Nonetheless, Kolko said: "The Oklahoma City bombing case was the largest case the FBI worked on before 9/11. Agents at virtually every office, domestically and overseas, covered thousands of leads. Every bit of information was investigated and reviewed. The FBI worked tirelessly to cover all of the leads and conducted a thorough and complete investigation."

Previously, the bureau has said it believes its investigation of the bombing was exhaustive and there is no credible evidence that other people were involved.

The subcommittee concludes the Justice Department should not have rushed to execute McVeigh in 2001 after he dropped his court appeals, and officials should have made more efforts to interview and question him about evidence suggesting he might have gotten help from other people who remain unpunished.

Unanswered questions
The former lead FBI agent in the case, Dan Defenbaugh, told AP a few years ago he was trying to get one last interview with McVeigh to go over unanswered questions in the case but could not get it arranged before McVeigh was executed.

Rohrabacher's report cites several leads the subcommittee believes were not fully investigated, including:

-Information that McVeigh called a German citizen living at a white supremacist compound in Oklahoma two weeks before the bombing and that two witnesses saw the men together before the bombing.

-Witness accounts that another man was seen with McVeigh around the time of the bombing. The FBI originally looked for another suspect it named John Doe 2, even providing a sketch, but abruptly dropped that line of inquiry. The subcommittee concludes that decision was a mistake.

-Findings in AP articles in 2003 and 2004 that indicated the FBI had gathered some evidence suggesting a group of neo-Nazi bank robbers may have been tied to McVeigh. The subcommittee interviewed three of those robbers, and all denied a connection. A fourth member of the gang died and a fifth member could not be located by Congress.

-Phone record and witness testimony that persons associated with Middle Eastern terrorism in the Philippines may have had contact with Nichols, and that Nichols took a book about explosives to the Philippines. The FBI and Filipino police spent months investigating such a connection, but ruled it out.

-Information from a former TV reporter concerning an Iraqi national who was in Oklahoma around the time of the bombing.
© 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16349811/

Iran angry about sanctions!

Oil Rises Near $63 on Iran Warning - Full Story Fox News

"If necessary, Iran will use any weapon to defend itself," Oil Minister Kazem Vaziri-Hamaneh was quoted as saying by the semi-official Fars news agency on Tuesday. In the past he has said Iran would prefer not to play the oil card.

Iran, the world's fourth-largest crude producer, has condemned the resolution as illegal and on Sunday vowed to speed up enrichment work, which could heighten tensions.

Dungeons and torture in Basra

December 26, 2006

Abuse Seen at Iraqi Jail Puts New Focus on Rogue Police - NY Times
By MARC SANTORA

BAGHDAD, Dec. 25 — Hundreds of British and Iraqi soldiers assaulted a police station in the southern city of Basra on Monday, killing seven gunmen, rescuing 127 prisoners from what the British said was almost certain execution and ultimately reducing the facility to rubble.

The military action was one of the most significant undertaken by British troops since the 2003 invasion, British officials said, adding that it was an essential step in any plan to re-establish security in Basra.

When the combined British and Iraqi force of 1,400 troops gained control of the station, it found the prisoners being held in conditions that a British military spokesman, Maj. Charlie Burbridge, described as “appalling.” More than 100 men were crowded into a single cell, 30 feet by 40 feet, he said, with two open toilets, two sinks and just a few blankets spread over the concrete floor.

A significant number showed signs of torture. Some had crushed hands and feet, Major Burbridge said, while others had cigarette and electrical burns and a significant number had gunshot wounds to their legs and knees.

The fetid dungeon was another example of abuses by the Iraqi security forces. The discovery highlighted the continuing struggle to combat the infiltration of the police and army by militias and criminal elements — even in a Shiite city like Basra, where there has been no sectarian violence.

As recently as October, the Iraqi government suspended an entire police brigade in Baghdad on suspicion of participation in death squads. The raid on Monday also raised echoes of the infamous Baghdad prison run by the Interior Ministry, known as Site 4, where more than 1,400 prisoners were subjected to systematic abuse and torture.

The focus of the attack was an arm of the local police called the serious crimes unit, which British officials said had been thoroughly infiltrated by criminals and militias who used it to terrorize local residents and violently settle scores with political or tribal rivals.

“The serious crimes unit was at the center of death squad activity,” Major Burbridge said.

A little over a year ago, British troops stormed the same building seeking to rescue two British special forces soldiers who had been captured by militants. A mob of 1,000 to 2,000 people gathered in protest, and a widely circulated video showed boys throwing stones at a burning British armored fighting vehicle parked outside the station. The soldiers, who were being held in a nearby building, were eventually freed.

Although some local officials, including Basra’s police chief, publicly condemned the action, local residents privately said they were grateful, and described what they said was an organization widely feared for its brutality.

“They are like savage dogs that bite when they are hungry,” said one resident, who spoke anonymously for fear of retribution. “Their evaluation of guilt or innocence is how much money you can pay.”

Residents said that people were afraid to challenge the officers because they were backed by powerful militia groups, including the Mahdi Army, which is led by the rebel cleric Moktada al-Sadr, though the extent of his control is unclear.

“Everyone wants to avoid the mouth of the lion,” one resident said. “From this, they became stronger and stronger.”

Major Burbridge said that the dismantling of the serious crimes unit had been planned for months.

As far back as 2004, he said, there was a growing realization that the police had been widely infiltrated by members of various militias and elements of organized crime. To combat their influence, the British have been trying to cull them from the forces in a campaign that began in September.

After trying to determine who was fit to serve in the police, the British began outfitting trusted officers with sophisticated identification cards meant to limit the access of impostors to police intelligence, weapons and vehicles.

In late October, gunmen — believed by the British to have been connected to the serious crimes unit — ambushed a minibus carrying 17 employees of a new police academy and killed them all. Their mutilated remains were dumped in the Shuaiba area of the city in an effort to intimidate the local population.

“It had simply gone beyond the pale and it was clear it was time for the serious crimes unit to go,” Major Burbridge said in an interview.

While they had planned to take over the station on Monday, British forces had to speed up the operation by several hours. “We received information late last night,” Major Burbridge said Monday, “that the crimes unit was aware this was going to take place and we received information that the prisoners’ lives were in danger.”

More than 800 British soldiers, supported by five Challenger tanks and roughly 40 Warrior fighting vehicles, began their assault at 2 a.m. on Monday. They were aided by 600 Iraqi soldiers.

The British force faced the heaviest fighting as it made its way through the city, coming under sporadic attacks by rocket-propelled grenades and small-arms fire. Of the seven guerrillas killed, six were gunned down as the unit made its way to the police station.

Upon reaching the station, British troops killed a guard in a watchtower who had fired on the approaching forces, but there was little other resistance.

The members of the serious crimes unit who had been occupying the building, several dozen, according to the British military, fled and were not caught. The British forces turned over the prisoners to the regular Iraqi police, who put them in a new detention facility.

The two-story building, once used by Saddam Hussein’s security forces, was then demolished, in an attempt to remove all traces of the serious crimes unit, Major Burbridge said.

The battle lasted nearly three hours. There were no British casualties, but the streets around the station were littered with bombed-out cars and rubble.

The violence in Basra, Iraq’s second largest city, is different from that in Baghdad to the north or Anbar Province to the west, Major Burbridge said.

The killing in Baghdad in recent months has primarily been the result of sectarian violence, as Shiites have sought to drive Sunnis from mixed neighborhoods and Sunnis have retaliated. On Monday, at least 10 civilians were killed and 15 were wounded when a car bomb exploded in the mixed neighborhood of Jadida.

In northeastern Baghdad, a suicide bomber with explosives tied to his body blew himself up on a crowded bus, killing 2 people and wounding 20 others.

An American soldier also died Monday in Baghdad in a roadside bomb attack.

In Sunni-controlled Anbar Province, where the fighting is mainly between insurgents and American troops, two American soldiers were killed in fighting on Sunday.

In southern cities like Basra, dominated by Shiites, the fighting is a combination of battles between rival militias vying for power, warring tribes and organized crime, Major Burbridge said.

“In northern Basra, the fighting is mainly between three warring tribes,” he said. “The death squads are typically related to political maneuvering and tribal gain. Then there are rogue elements of militias aiming attacks on the multinational forces. You throw all those elements into a melting pot and you get a picture of the complexity of what we are facing.”

Sunday, December 24, 2006

More on Hillary & Obama '08!

Clinton, Obama Clearing The Field
Without Declaring, They Beat Back Would-Be Rivals

By Dan Balz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, December 24, 2006; A01

"Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), trading on star power, the capacity to raise tens of millions of dollars with relative ease and an ability to dominate media attention, are rewriting the script of the 2008 Democratic presidential campaign, driving potential rivals to the sidelines and casting a huge shadow over all others who may run."

Iran rejects UN resolutions

Iran Rejects UN Resolution, Pledges to Be Nuclear (Update1)

By Ladane Nasseri

Dec. 24 (Bloomberg) -- Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad rejected a United Nations resolution imposing sanctions on his country as a ``scrap of paper'' and said the world would have to accept Iran as a nuclear power.

The UN Security Council voted unanimously yesterday in favour of imposing sanctions on the Islamic Republic over its refusal to suspend uranium enrichment. The sanctions include a ban on materials and technology that could be used to build a nuclear bomb.

Whether Western countries ``like it or not, Iran is a nuclear country and it is in their interest to live alongside a nuclear Iran,'' Ahmadinejad was quoted as saying today by the state-run Fars news agency.

Iran is the second-biggest producer in the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, which pumps 40 percent of the world's oil. It sits on one side of the Straits of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf. Nations including the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait currently ship most of their crude exports through the waterway.

The UN resolution requires Iran to halt uranium enrichment and heavy-water projects that the U.S. and its European allies have said may lead to the development of nuclear weapons. It freezes the financial assets of 12 named individuals and 11 groups such as the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran.

The measure also requires the UN's nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, to report on Iran's compliance within 60 days. ``Further appropriate measures'' such as economic penalties and severance of diplomatic relations will be required if Iran doesn't comply, the resolution says.

Nuclear Program

The security council's vote will spur Iran to run its nuclear program ``in a firmer, more organized and more decisive way than before,'' Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad Ali Hosseini was quoted as saying today by state television.

Iran will ``start the installation of 3,000 centrifuges in its uranium enrichment facility in Natanz,'' Hosseini said in a press conference today, according to the television report.

Centrifuges produce concentrated uranium, which can be used in nuclear reactors or weapons. Iran says it needs the fuel to generate electricity.

The Iranian parliament agreed today to discuss ``urgently'' a bill which urges the government to reconsider its cooperation with the IAEA, state television reported.

To contact the reporter on this story: Ladane Nasseri in Tehran at lnasseri@bloomberg.net .
Last Updated: December 24, 2006 06:37 EST

Saturday, December 23, 2006

Perhaps, we should leave...

Insurgents offer U.S. 30-day truce to get out of Iraq

Story Highlights•NEW: Iraq militant group leader wants U.S. out, offers to halt fighting
•Military reports five U.S. troop deaths, making 73 in December
•Iraqi troops, coalition forces launch separate raids in Diyala, Baghdad and Basra
•Gates prepares report for President Bush on findings from Iraq trip


BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- The leader of an umbrella organization for Iraqi insurgent groups is offering the United States a one-month truce to withdraw all U.S. forces from Iraq and turn over its military bases "to the mujahedeen of the Islamic state."

In an audiotape posted on Islamic Web sites Friday, a speaker identified as Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, the leader of the Mujahideen Shura Council, said that if U.S. forces begin withdrawing from Iraq immediately and leave their heavy weaponry behind, "we will allow your withdrawal to complete without anyone targeting you with any explosive or anything else."

"We say to Bush not to waste this historic opportunity that will guarantee you a safe withdrawal," al-Baghdadi said on the audiotape.

The United States was given two weeks to respond to the offer.

The Mujahideen Shura Council is an umbrella group formed in late 2005 that includes several terrorist and insurgent groups, including al Qaeda in Iraq.

On the audiotape, al-Baghdadi also called on officers from the former Iraqi army to join an "army of the Islamic state," promising them a house and a salary as long as they pass a "test of faith" intended to demonstrate the extent of their "hatred" for Saddam Hussein and his regime.

The U.S. military Friday reported five U.S. troop deaths, while Iraqi authorities reported the discovery of a dozen bodies and the kidnapping of a Sunni imam in Baghdad.

One soldier was killed and another wounded when attackers targeted a coalition patrol west of the capital, the U.S. military said. Three Marines and a sailor assigned to Regimental Combat Team 7 died Thursday from wounds suffered during combat in Anbar province, the military also said.

The deaths bring the December U.S. military death toll to 73 and the overall total during the war to 2,955; seven U.S. contractors also have been killed.

Other developments

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates concluded his three-day tour of Iraq to assess U.S. troop levels and Iraq's security situation. He was headed for Washington on Friday and was expected to issue a report of his consultations with U.S. troops, commanders and Iraqi officials to President Bush during the weekend. (Watch what insights Gates is getting from U.S. troops in Iraq)

Coalition forces in Baghdad killed an insurgent and detained 35 others Friday morning during raids aimed at al Qaeda in Iraq members, the U.S. military said. In Basra, about 1,000 British troops arrested four and seized weapons in a sweep to arrest police suspected of death squad activities. Iraqi troops in Diyala province also launched raids, detaining 13 people in a sweep that targeted "an illegal armed group cell."

The Shiite leadership says it will not exclude radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, a statement that appeared to douse hopes for the emergence of a moderate political alliance that would include Sunni and Kurdish parties. (Full story)

President Bush and first lady Laura Bush made bedside visits to 38 American service members at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center on Friday, The Associated Press reported. They joined Girl Scouts and children of hospital staff to wrap presents for families and children of wounded military personnel and were to head for Camp David later Friday for the Christmas holiday, AP reported. (Full story)

Polish President Lech Kaczynski has approved a one-year extension through 2007 for his country's 900 troops to serve in Iraq, the AP cited his foreign policy adviser as saying Friday. They are mainly involved in training Iraqi security forces, AP reported.

Eight Marines have been charged in the killings of 24 Iraqi civilians in Haditha last year, the Marine Corps announced Thursday. (Full story)
CNN's Jomana Karadsheh, Jamie McIntyre and Eileen Hsieh contributed to this report

Copyright 2006 CNN. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Associated Press contributed to this report.

Neo-Cons brace for Hillary '08!

End of the neo-con dream
By Paul Reynolds
World Affairs correspondent


The neo-conservative dream faded in 2006.

The ambitions proclaimed when the neo-cons' mission statement "The Project for the New American Century" was declared in 1997 have turned into disappointment and recriminations as the crisis in Iraq has grown.

"The Project for the New American Century" has been reduced to a voice-mail box and a ghostly website. A single employee has been left to wrap things up.

The idea of the "Project" was to project American power and influence around the world.

The 1997 statement (written during the administration of President Bill Clinton) said:

"We seem to have forgotten the essential elements of the Reagan Administration's success: a military that is strong and ready to meet both present and future challenges; a foreign policy that boldly and purposefully promotes American principles abroad; and national leadership that accepts the United States' global responsibilities."


Neo-conservatism has gone for a generation, if in fact it ever returns
David Rothkopf
Carnegie Endowment

Among the signatories were many of the senior officials who would later determine policy under President George W Bush - Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Elliot Abrams and Lewis Libby - as well as thinkers including Francis Fukuyama, Norman Podheretz and Frank Gaffney.

The neo-conservatives were called that because they sought to re-establish what they felt were true conservative values in the Republican Party and the United States.

They wanted to stop what they felt were the isolationist tendencies that had developed under President Clinton, and even under the pragmatic President George Bush senior.

They saw the war in Iraq as their big chance of showing how the "New American Century" might work.

They predicted the development of democratic values in a region lacking in them and, in that way, the removal of any threat to the United States just as the democratisation of Germany and Japan after World War II had transformed Europe and the Pacific.

Attack

Since so much was pinned on Iraq, it is inevitable that the problems there should have undermined the whole idea.


George Bush is about the last neo-conservative standing
David Rothkopf
Carnegie Endowment

"Neo-conservatism has gone for a generation, if in fact it ever returns," says one of the movement's critics, David Rothkopf, currently at the Carnegie Endowment in Washington, and a former official in the Clinton administration.
"Their signal enterprise was the invasion of Iraq and their failure to produce results is clear. Precisely the opposite has happened," he says.

"The US use of force has been seen as doing wrong and as inflaming a region that has been less than susceptible to democracy.

"Their plan has fallen on hard times. There were flaws in the conception and horrendously bad execution. The neo-cons have been undone by their own ideas and the incompetence of the Bush administration.

"George Bush is about the last neo-conservative standing, Cheney as well maybe. Bush is not an analytical person so he just adopted the neo-cons' philosophy.

"It fitted into his Manichean, his black and white view of the world. After all, he gave up his dissolute youth and was born again as a new man, so it appealed to his character."

In-fighting

The fading of the dream has led to a falling-out among the neo-conservatives themselves.


In particular, two leading neo-conservatives, Richard Perle and Kenneth Adelman, attacked the Bush team in Vanity Fair magazine. Both had been on a Pentagon advisory board. Both had argued for war in Iraq.

In an article called "Neo Culpa", Richard Perle declared that had he known how it would turn out, he would have been against it: "I think now I probably would have said: 'No, let's consider other strategies'."

Kenneth Adelman said: "They turned out to be among the most incompetent teams in the post-war era.

"Not only did each of them, individually, have enormous flaws, but together they were deadly, dysfunctional."

Donald Rumsfeld "fooled me", he said.

He declared of neo-conservatism after Iraq: "It's not going to sell."

Defence and counter-attack

Other neo-conservatives defend their record, arguing strongly that the original idea had an effect, and pressing the point raised by Perle and Adelman that it was the execution of the idea not the idea itself that was wrong.


"Now I am not sure we can pick the bacon out of the fire
Gary Schmitt
American Enterprise Institute

Gary Schmitt used to be a senior figure at the "New American Century" project. Now he is director of strategic studies at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), and he says the project has come to a natural end.

"When the project started, it was not intended to go forever. That is why we are shutting it down. We would have had to spend too much time raising money for it and it has already done its job.

"We felt at the time that there were flaws in American foreign policy, that it was neo-isolationist. We tried to resurrect a Reaganite policy.

"Our view has been adopted. Even during the Clinton administration we had an effect, with Madeleine Albright [then secretary of state] saying that the United States was 'the indispensable nation'.

"But our ideas have not necessarily dominated. We did not have anyone sitting on Bush's shoulder. So the work now is to see how they are implemented. Obviously it makes life difficult with the specific failure in Iraq, but I do not agree with Richard Perle that we should never have gone in.

"I do argue that the execution should have been better. In fact, I argued in late 2003 that we needed more troops and a proper counter-insurgency policy."

Indeed, not all neo-conservatives have given up all hope in Iraq.

The AEI, which has become the natural home for refugees from the American Project, is promoting an article entitled: "Choosing Victory: A Plan for Success in Iraq".

The article calls not for a withdrawal of US troops but for an increase. President Bush's decision is expected in early January.

Paul.Reynolds-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/6189793.stm

Published: 2006/12/21 11:23:52 GMT

Friday, December 22, 2006

Security cuts and reports on new vulnerabilities!

Today in the News:

Report: Carry-on bomb could flood N.Y. tunnel Commuter rail tunnels to New Jersey said vulnerable to sabotage


Senate Plan Cuts Security Funding for Big Cities - Friday , June 30, 2006

WASHINGTON — Major cities that compete fiercely for annual counterterror funding face a $12 million cut next year under a spending plan approved by a Senate panel Thursday.

The proposed funding drop follows bitter protests from the two cities targeted in the 9/11 terror attacks after the Homeland Security Department last month slashed their annual share by 40 percent.

The Senate Appropriations Committee also agreed to delay requirements for passports or other secure documents from travelers — including Americans — entering the U.S. from Canada or Mexico until June 2009.

The changes were part of an overall $31.7 billion Homeland Security spending blueprint for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1. The plan would boost security funding by $715 million more than what the White House requested, and $1.4 million beyond current spending levels.

Click here for the Homeland Security Content Center

But it would reduce spending for the nation's high-risk big cities from the $757 million in 2006 to $745 million in fiscal 2007. The White House had requested $838 million for such cities in 2007.

Last month, New York and Washington officials howled after watching their 2006 funding levels drop by 40 percent while cities like Omaha, Neb., got a boost.

Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., said the Senate spending plan doesn't cover needs for New York "or anywhere else."

"This drop in funding starts us off already in a hole," Schumer said.

The spending plan also would delay a controversial border security program for 17 months as lawmakers said the Bush administration appears unable to meet its initial January 2008 deadline. The program would require passports or a small number of other tamper-resistant identification from travelers who now enter the U.S. from Mexico and Canada using birth certificates and drivers' licenses.

The bulk of the money in the spending plan is targeted for the Coast Guard and for transportation and border security programs.

Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., who oversees the panel's homeland security spending, said the plan makes sure the funding "is concentrated on the greatest threats facing our nation: border security, preventing the use of weapons of mass destruction, and intelligence gathering capacity."

He said the plan will be considered by the full Senate as soon as lawmakers return from a weeklong July 4 recess.

The House approved a $32 billion Homeland Security spending plan in early June.

What you can do for your country? Or what you might be forced to do...

Bush plans to increase size of U.S. military

U.S. Selective Service Prepares Test of Military Draft

"WASHINGTON — The Selective Service System, which has remained in existence despite the abandonment of conscription three decades ago, is making preparations to tests its draft machinery in case Congress and President George W. Bush need it, even though the White House says it does not want to bring back the draft."

VA chief calls draft beneficial, but ...

Then Nicholson backtracks on comment, saying he doesn’t support a callup
The Associated Press
Updated: 8:44 p.m. ET Dec 21, 2006
NEW YORK - President Bush’s secretary for Veterans Affairs said Thursday that “society would benefit” if the country brought back the military draft, then clarified that he doesn’t support such a move.

Veterans Affairs Secretary Jim Nicholson spoke a day after Bush said he is considering sending more troops to Iraq. The administration has for years forcefully opposed bringing back the draft, and the White House said Thursday that its position had not changed.

Nicholson, who served in Vietnam, was in New York to announce a partnership with Mayor Michael Bloomberg to help homeless veterans find housing.

A reporter suggested that the all-volunteer armed forces attract a disproportionate number of minorities and people trying to lift themselves out of poverty, and asked Nicholson if the draft should be reinstated to make the military more equal.

“I think that our society would benefit from that, yes sir,” Nicholson said.

The secretary recalled his own experience as a company commander in an infantry unit that brought together soldiers of different backgrounds and education levels, noting that the draft “does bring people from all quarters of our society together in the common purpose of serving.”


He later issued a statement saying his comments had been misconstrued and that he does not support bringing back the draft.

Nicholson, a graduate of the military academy at West Point, N.Y., served eight years on active duty as a paratrooper and Ranger-qualified Army officer, then 22 years in the Army reserve. He has held the VA post since February 2005.

Bush said he has not made up his mind about whether to send more troops to Iraq. No timetables or totals have been outlined publicly, but by some accounts roughly 20,000 troops could be added to the 140,000 already there.

© 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16318530/