Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Britain forecasts growth slowdown amid election furore

LONDON (AFP) - - The British government, under fire over its decision not to call a snap general election, admitted Tuesday that the economy was facing a sharper-than-expected slowdown due to global financial turmoil.

British finance minister Alistair Darling's maiden pre-budget report Tuesday was overshadowed by a row over Prime Minister Gordon Brown's decision not to call an early general election amid opinion polls that favoured the opposition Conservative party.

Darling said his report came at "a time of increased international economic uncertainty and a more fragile global environment, which has already seen turbulence in America, Asia and Europe."

He used his speech to parliament to offer additional funds for British forces fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq, while proposing to close tax loopholes enjoyed by the private equity industry.

Conservative party finance spokesman George Osborne branded Darling's tax and spend pledges as "a pre-election budget without the election," adding that the report was a "desperate cynical stunt from a desperate and weak prime minister."

Darling's pre-budget report is a curtain-raiser to his main annual budget due early next year. He replaced Brown as chancellor of the exchequer in June, as his predecessor became prime minister.

The chancellor told parliament that British economic growth would likely come to 2.0-2.5 percent in 2008 -- which marked a sharp downgrade from the Labour government's previous forecast of 2.5-3.0 percent.

Despite slashing the forecast, Darling lauded Britain's economy as "the fastest growing major advanced economy in the world" -- and also maintained GDP growth forecasts of 2.5-3.0 percent in 2009 and 2010.

He added: "It is that underlying strength of the economy that will stand us in good stead as we face the current international instability that started in the American mortgage market and has now spread across the world.

"The full impact from turbulence on the international markets is as yet unclear.... but the IMF (International Monetary Fund) has said this international uncertainty will have an effect on growth right across the world."

Turning to domestic policy, Darling revealed that the inheritance tax threshold for married couples and those in civil partnerships would be lifted, from 300,000 pounds to 700,000 pounds by 2010.

The move was widely interpreted as a response to the well-received Conservative party proposal to slash inheritance taxation -- or so-called death taxes.

On the topic of climate change, Darling appealed for a Europe-wide level of value-added tax for energy efficient goods and proposed a 5.0-percent level in Britain.

Analysts said that his pre-budget was largely in line with market expectations.

"In light of the election/no election debate heading into this pre-budget report, the measures introduced came as little surprise," noted CIBC economist Jodie Tiller.

Darling also predicted that British gross domestic product (GDP) growth would stand at 3.0 percent in 2007, in line with previous forecasts. He added that annual inflation would be close to the Bank of England's 2.0-percent target in the next two years.

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development last month warned that recent financial market chaos that plagued British banking group Northern Rock could put the brakes on Britain's future growth.

Dollar slips further amid rate cut expectations

By Lisa Twaronite, MarketWatch
Last Update: 1:48 PM ET Oct 10, 2007

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- The dollar slipped against its major counterparts Wednesday, a day after minutes from the Federal Reserve's Sept. 18 meeting reinforced some investors' expectations that another interest rate cut is coming later this month.

The minutes showed Fed officials voted unanimously for the half-percentage point rate cut and called it "the most prudent course of action," and said that future actions would depend on how the economy fared in coming weeks. Read The Fed.

"[N]otwithstanding the lack of a formal easing bias, policymakers are clearly more worried about the economy than inflation, which is why they voted unanimously to ease 50 points with nary any talk of dissension," wrote Sal Guatieri, economist at BMO Capital Markets.
"Since the last policy meeting, dismal housing data, still wide short-term credit spreads, and an established slowing trend in private-sector employment would seem to weigh towards another reduction" of a quarter point at the next Fed meeting Oct. 31, he said.

Lower interest rates erode returns on dollar-denominated assets and therefore weigh on the greenback.
Chart of C_EUR
The dollar index, which measures the greenback against a basket of major currencies, was at 78.315, down from 78.470 in late U.S. trading Tuesday.

The euro rose to $1.4139, up from $1.4106 late Tuesday.

The dollar was buying 117.00 yen, down from 117.08 yen Tuesday.
Japan has the lowest interest rates in the developed world, with its benchmark set at 0.5%.
The Bank of Japan will begin its monthly policy meeting Wednesday and is widely expected to keep interest rates steady. See full story.

A survey compiled by Japan's Cabinet Office's Economic Planning Association released Tuesday showed that private-sector economists expect the BOJ to raise interest rates either in December or February, the Nikkei reported.

Ten respondents said interest rates will be lifted in December, while another 10 predicted that a hike will take place in February. In the previous survey, 15 respondents forecast a rate increase in October. More economists now believe that the rate hike will be delayed due to the U.S. subprime loan crisis.


What rate cut?

While the dollar remained under pressure after the Fed minutes, some analysts said that the scenario revealed in the minutes didn't send a clear signal either way. Some even said a further cut was now less, not more, likely.

In fact, Treasurys continued to fall Wednesday, as investors in that market increasingly priced in expectations that another cut is not forthcoming. See Bond Report.

"[Y]esterday's less pessimistic FOMC minutes...reinforce our view that an October cut is not a done deal and have lowered market expectations of an October cut from 50% to 36%," noted currency strategists at Brown Brother's Harriman.

Eric Rosengren, the new president of the Boston Federal Reserve Bank, said in a speech Wednesday that the effect of the problems in housing on consumption has been muted to date. But he said if housing prices fall further or if the price declines spread across the country, this "would increase the risk of a more adverse impact on consumption." See full story.
Gold advanced further on Wednesday, in line with the weaker dollar. See Metals Stocks.
On Wall Street, stocks gave back some of Tuesday's record gains after blue-chip aluminum producer Alcoa Inc. fell short of earnings estimates and International Paper Co. issued a profit warning. See Market Snapshot.

American habits and the falling dollar: No one likes to go hungry

Rob Creekmore

monroe street journal

Before he was the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke spoke of a "global savings glut," and the fact that the US was the exception. Frankly, it was difficult for Americans to see what he was talking about. The US had experienced negative private savings since 1995 and record public spending deficits since 2000. Therein lay the problem. America could seemingly borrow in perpetuity. With the dollar propped up by China's artificial currency peg, Americans could continue to buy foreign goods cheaply. And with low interest rates fueling the housing bubble, there was even more borrowing against home equity. How long could it last? How big of a fall were Americans setting themselves up for?

Fast forward a few years and the Fed finally raised interest rates throughout 2005, taking away the punch bowl. Only then did the dollar begin to recover against the Euro, but the effect was only temporary. In 2006, we saw the dollar continue to fall, down a staggering 35% against the Euro since 2002. Did Ben Bernanke decide to raise rates again? No - in fact the Federal Reserve lowered them by a half-point. Why did Ben "flip-flop?" Well, with higher interest rates, we saw more expensive home equity loans triggering the collapse of the housing bubble. In combination with the increased use of adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs), higher interest rates also led to record setting default rates of subprime mortgages. While some hedge funds have bet against these subprime lenders, others took huge losses. Banks quickly became hesitant to loan each-other money, fearful of being left holding the bill. Mr. Bernanke's recent action to lower short term interest rates by half a point has eased the credit crunch, but at what cost? What flexibility does the Fed really have at this point? Now that the music has stopped, will America be left standing without a chair? To get an informed perspective, we met with several faculty members at the Stephen M. Ross School of Business and the University of Michigan, Department of Economics.

At a basic level, we have all heard that savings equals investment. The US has negative private savings, negative public (i.e. government) savings, with the majority of investment coming from overseas. What does that mean for the account deficit in the long term? How can it be so imbalanced?

Professor Linda Tesar, Professor and Chair of the Department of Economics at the University of Michigan, joined us to comment:

Tesar: "Keep in mind that savings does not equal investment in an open economy - only in a closed economy."

One fear that some of us have is that a sudden drop in the dollar could cause foreign investors to "puke their positions" and pull out of the US market because it has gone beyond their tolerance for risk. And if that is possible, in its move to diversify its $1.3 trillion foreign currency reserves into a basket of currencies and private investments (ala Blackstone), could China's sale of T-bonds trigger a run on the bank?

Professor Minyuan Zhao, who teaches a class on World Economy as an Assistant Professor of Strategy at the Ross School of Business, generously lent us her time.

Zhao: "China has been divesting itself of its position in the market, but slowly. It's simply not in China's best interest to move quickly on this, because it will only devalue its dollar holdings. China is divesting for a few reasons. As Europe consumes more of China's exported goods, China will not be so nervous about the depreciation of the dollar. Second, China is diversifying because ultimately the dollar may not be entirely risk-free."

Zhao: "Think of it this way: American consumers are buying its toasters, microwaves, textiles, etc, and China is simply getting IOU's in return. China is basically giving out loans to sell more goods and services. Now, historically, the US has had a very high credit rating. But as we have seen with some large companies that start out with high credit ratings, they do not always keep them high. Likewise, the US credit rating may gradually go down."

That would seem to explain why the Fed has been raising rates in 2005 and 2006, even after the housing market was in clear decline, presumably to keep foreign investment flowing into the US, slow the rate of foreign central banks divesting US holdings, and keep the exchange rate from dropping too rapidly.

Professor Jagadeesh Sivadasan, Assistant Professor of Business Economics at the Ross School of Business, also joined us to speak about Federal Reserve policy and the trade deficit.

Sivadasan: "The Federal Reserve is focused on keeping inflation low. In theory, they don't really care about exchange rates; only in so much as they affect the overall health of the economy. Let's take India for example. It used to be that India's trade was highly regulated and the only major import was oil. In fact, a large portion of the nation's oil was imported. If the currency drops, the price of oil goes up, but the demand for India's exports also goes up. In the long run, there is an indirect effect on inflation. We may see that here in the US, but I am not sure the impact will be very large since the US has a relatively low trade to GDP ratio."

Rob: So what was Bernanke thinking when the Fed dropped interest rates by half a point? If the Fed is just concerned about inflation, didn't he just boost direct inflationary pressures and at the same time discourage the other central banks from holding onto their T-bonds?

Zhao: "He is in a bind. But the risk in my view is not a drop in the dollar. The risk is in giving Wall Street the impression that a bailout will occur after a bout of poor investment choices. In the next boom cycle, they will take even more risks if they think another bailout will come."

Rob: What is not clear to me is why at the very same time Bernanke cut interest rates, we see Greenspan in his new book, "The Age of Turbulence," talking about the Fed having to raise interest rates into the double digits in the next decade. Obviously rates that high are not entirely new, but it has been a long time since the US has had to deal with that. Is he actually saying inflation risk will be that high?

Zhao: "He's talking about going hungry. Once you eat a big meal, you have to go hungry for a while. But no-one likes to be hungry, so most likely it is going to happen involuntarily. Eventually, we will see the reluctance of foreign investors drive up the interest rate and drive down the value of the dollar… so fewer Americans can afford to buy McMansions or expensive foreign cars." Professor Zhao was talking about the rising cost of capital - the fact that with inflation taken into account, real interest rates have risen 4% in the last year, from negative 1% between 2001 and 2005, to 3% now. "At the same time, American goods and services will be in higher demand overseas, which corrects the imbalance."

Rob: It's just mind boggling to think that the US trade deficit, negative since 1979 and growing every year, will reverse course.

Tesar: "According to this figure, it has already begun to change course [in late 2006]."

Zhao: "The currency will drop until the trade deficit comes into balance. If you look at the Asian financial crisis of 1997, the Korean currency [Won] lost 60% of its value. The Thai Baht lost 60% of its value. That won't happen in the US. It is a large and robust economy, a diversified economy. Part of the reason that the Dow Jones is doing so well right now is that it is mostly made up of multinational companies, which are diversified in terms of revenue sources in a variety of currencies. A weaker dollar ultimately means that foreign profit translates into more dollars. A soft landing would be a weaker dollar and that the US imports less foreign goods." (A hard landing would presumably be a recession and high interest rates.) "It's going to be somewhere in-between."

Rob: Where does this leave American business with respect to foreign investors? Could they get nervous and pull out?

Tesar: "If the current account is in deficit because other countries are making highly productive investments in the US, then there is little cause for concern. Where will investors go if not to the US? Despite our problems, the investment climate here appears to be healthier than anywhere else."

Sivadasan: "Capital will flow so long as foreign investors continue to see value for their money. As long as American companies continue to come up with innovative ideas and create intellectual capital, it can continue. What's curious is why Blackstone bought Hilton as opposed to somebody like Disney."

Our distinguished guest Robert McKee may have been onto something at this year's Ross Leadership Initiative, when he declared, "There are no hotels in China!" Regardless, there is no need to worry. With inflation solid at 2%, don't expect to see people pushing wheelbarrows of cash or buying cab rides with Marlboro's and Smirnoff. The expert consensus at Michigan is that we will continue to see the dollar drop until consumption and investment habits change to bring our capital account and trade deficits into balance. Make no mistake, this is good for US business, but some Ross grads may get sticker shock at their next visit to the BMW dealership.

Economics to decide dollar peg shift

GULF WEEKLY

THEGulf Co-operation Council (GCC) countries backing the dollar peg now would have to rethink their strategy if inflation got out of hand.

If the dollar drops further and Gulf currencies fall with it, the region will import more inflation from its trade partners in Europe, whose euro currency has surged to record highs against the dollar. Central banks cannot ignore popular sentiment and let rising inflation and falling exchange rates go unbridled for long.

Therefore, it will be finally economics and not political convenience that decides if the GCC will remain tied to dollar woes.

Except for Kuwait, which in May dropped the dollar peg in favour of a basket of currencies to ward off imported inflation, the remaining five GCC states have kept their currencies linked to the dollar.

They have agreed to keep the dollar peg until monetary union in 2010. By keeping the peg, the Gulf currencies have become undervalued against the dollar by about 20 to 25 per cent, according to estimates.

UAE’s official inflation rate for 2006 was 9.3 per cent, but international agencies place it above 10 per cent.

Analysts say the surge was caused by rent increases as housing supply fell short of population growth. In 2006, the annual inflation reached the highest level of 11.8 per cent in Qatar, followed by the UAE at 10.1 per cent, Oman 3.2 per cent, Kuwait and Bahrain three per cent each, and Saudi Arabia 2.2 per cent.

This year, inflation in Kuwait hit 5 per cent in the first quarter and in Saudi Arabia it increased to 3.1 per cent as food and housing costs climbed.

Serhan Cevik, an economist at Morgan Stanley, says the weaker dollar will worsen already high inflationary pressures in the Gulf countries.

Average inflation in oil-exporting economies in the Middle East has soared from 0.1 per cent between 1998 and 2002 to 6.5 per cent this year.

Imported inflation is becoming a bigger threat, as currencies pegged to the dollar keep weakening, says Cevik. Moreover, the abundance of petrodollar liquidity is going to continue with higher oil prices.

Inflation rates would not get corrected unless the authorities decide to revalue exchange rates, Cevik says.

The greenback fell almost 2 per cent against a basket of major currencies in the week after the Federal Reserve cut America’s short-term interest rates on September 18, hitting a new low for the post-1973 floating era.

The fall was particularly pronounced against the euro, where the dollar fell to a record $1.41 per euro on September 25.

Saudi Arabia’s decision not to follow the Fed’s lead and cut interest rates fuelled speculation that the oil kingdom was about to break its 21-year peg with the greenback. There was also the fear that a plunging dollar will fuel inflationary pressure in America and thus limit the Fed’s ability to cut interest rates further.

In Europe there are worries that a high-value euro will imperil the region’s growth.

With inflation rising fast in Saudi Arabia, the link to a falling dollar is causing a growing headache.

A revaluation against the dollar or, better, a link to a basket of currencies –similar to the one Kuwait now has – would make more sense.

But the Saudi government has denied that it plans anything of the sort. Its central bank governor repeated a commitment to the dollar peg on September 26.

More important, a change in Saudi Arabia’s currency regime—or that of other oil exporters—need not cause a dollar crash. Shifting to a currency peg does not mean a central bank would suddenly dump its dollar assets.

Bahrain too has reiterated that it would stick to the dollar peg. But if Saudi Arabia dumps dollar, then we might see Bahrain also following suit.

Considering the rate at which inflation is rising, the UAE looks the most likely candidate to revalue.

The European Union’s importance to the country has risen with imports increasing from 11.3 billion euros in 2002 to 26.4 billion euros in 2006.

The EU now accounts for close to 30 per cent of all imports to the UAE, while the USA accounts for only 11 per cent, according to EU trade statistics.

From 2002 to 2007, the exchange rate between the euro and the dirham has plunged by 28 per cent, making EU goods almost one-third more expensive.

Even for exports the dollar peg does not make sense. The US accounted for only 1.2 per cent of UAE exports in 2006 even as Japan bought 26.4 per cent of all UAE export goods in the same year.

Another major issue caused by the dollar slump is falling exchange rates, which is a major worry for the large expatriate population in the GCC countries.

While the nationals and expatriates alike feel the pinch of the rising cost of living, the expatriates face the risk of losing a significant share of earnings to inflation and currency volatility.

The Indian rupee has gained more than 14 per cent against the dirham from the beginning of the year. The exchange rate losses combined with domestic inflation have cut into more than one third of the earnings of Indian expatriates working in the UAE.

Most western expatriates have also suffered heavily from the dirham’s fall.

The GCC invests nearly 25 per cent of its oil revenues in dollar-denominated assets, according to a study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

The euro would be the biggest beneficiary should the GCC shift reserves since the euro zone is one of the Arab region’s biggest trading partners.

Euro-zone exports to all oil producing nations, including those in the Gulf, had climbed $77 billion to hit $167 billion from 2002-2006.

Further adding to revaluation talk has been the dollar’s generalised weakness, which was exacerbated by the Fed’s recent rate cut. At $3.5 trillion, the currency reserves of the oil-producing nations are roughly three times the size of China’s, and their current account surplus of $500 billion is more than twice as high.

A diversion of even part of this financing base would further undermine the dollar, which has been hammered by the large and growing US current account deficit, analysts say.

Already, Qatar’s $50 billion sovereign wealth fund has cut its exposure to the dollar by more than half to around 40 per cent of its portfolio over the past two years.

Consumers, businesses feel crunch of falling dollar

(Original publication: October 8, 2007)

As Carol Fleischmann shopped for women's shoes at p.ross, an upscale clothing retailer in Nyack, she reflected on how her spending habits might change because of the rising costs of the Italian imports lining the sales floor.

"It certainly makes you more cautious as to how you arrange your wardrobe," said Fleischmann, of Piermont. "You have to be a little more selective in the way you shop. You might buy an item or two less. I don't feel I have the freedom to splurge."

Largely because of a powerful economic force beyond its control - the weakening dollar - the store had little choice but to raise the price for a pair of women's low-heeled dress shoes from $140 to $154 in six months. Other items on the sales floor cost more, too. A women's cardigan sweater is priced at $150, up 8.6 percent over the same period, and a leather handbag is marked at $382, up 7.6 percent. All of the products were made in Italy.

"I like to come here because I know that I will find something unique," said shopper Terry Graves, a real estate agent in Nyack. "But you have to be prepared to pay more for it."

When the once-mighty greenback weakens, clothing and other goods manufactured in foreign countries and shipped to in the United States rise in cost. In the Lower Hudson Valley, and across the nation, the sticker shock means that consumers often are paying more for imported gasoline, cars, wines, cheeses, electronics, furniture and numerous other items made abroad.

"When I see these prices, it is, 'Oh my goodness,' " said Paulette Ross, who has operated the p.ross store for two years. "The challenge is to find something on the lower end so that consumers are not completely shell-shocked when they walk into the store. There is a limit to what the consumer can take or absorb if the dollar keeps going down."

There is little sign, however, that relief is on the way for merchants like Ross. The dollar has lost 35 percent of its value against a basket of six major currencies in six years. It has fallen to its weakest levels since 1973.

The dollar's slide stems partly from mounting pressures on the U.S. economy that include a federal government and consumers spending beyond their means, a soaring trade deficit in which imports far exceed exports, a shaky housing market and rising mortgage defaults by riskier borrowers.

Pessimists such as Robert H. Parks, a finance professor at Pace University, maintain that the weakness of the dollar is only in the early stages. If the trends continue, he said, the dollar could fall another 25 percent or more.

"If you keep running out-of-control budget deficits for years and years, it will culminate sooner or later in a major financial crisis in which the dollar plunges, interest rates spike and the stock market goes into a major nosedive," he said. "There already is a lot of fear out there."

'The costs were just astronomical'

To some consumers, speculation about the dollar can seem to be an abstract, academic exercise that is remote from their daily lives.

But in reality, currency movements hit consumers in many ways.

Just ask Richard Esman, co-president of Rich Worldwide Travel in Harrison. On a recent trip to England, Esman and his wife, Michele, discovered that higher costs of traveling abroad are an offshoot of a weak dollar.

When they went into a London restaurant, the couple were shocked to pay $48 for two hamburgers and two sodas. A 10-minute cab ride cost about $15. A hotel room? Try $350 a night.

Esman figures the costs overall for an English vacation have jumped 50 percent in three years, a period during which the dollar weakened significantly against the British pound and the euro.

"The costs were just astronomical," Esman said.

Esman's travel agency has taken steps to help keep costs manageable for customers, including negotiating preferential rates with European hotels and package deals that include breakfast with the hotel stay. Cruises also have become more popular, because travelers can sleep on the ship and avoid the sticker shock of foreign hotels.

"People are still traveling because it is a favorite American pastime," said Allen Rich, executive director of Rich Worldwide Travel, which has offices in Westchester, Rockland and elsewhere in the region. "But we are concerned about the exchange rates. Eventually, it could reach a point where it really would affect the traveling public."

Changes on the local level: higher prices

The weak dollar also means higher prices for imported wines and liquors. At Armonk Wines & Spirits, a bottle of imported Johnnie Walker Blue Scotch sells for $220, up from over $170 a year ago. Prices of some French wines are up 10 percent to 15 percent, said owner Gael Lorenzen.

Even a small cup of coffee has risen from $1.50 to $1.55 at Moonbean Cafe in Briarcliff Manor, because most coffee beans are imported. The weak dollar is just one of the added cost pressures for the store, which also is affected by the higher costs of gasoline and milk.

"In some ways, it comes back home to everyone," said Abigail Wallace, owner of the cafe. "You have to explain to customers how the prices of everything have gone up significantly."

When Barry Kirschner began working 30 years ago at Lubin’s of Westchester, a clothing store for boys and men in Greenburgh, about 70 percent of the store’s merchandise was made in the United States. At the time, he made trips to New York City to pick up sport coats, overcoats, shirts and neckties manufactured there. Thirty years later, production has largely moved to lower-wage countries.

With 90 percent of the clothing sold at Lubin’s imported from Italy, Eastern Europe or Asia, the weak dollar is having a major impact on prices. In one example, the price of an Italian suit for boys is $375, up about 9 percent from a year ago. Kirschner, owner of Lubin’s, said that his profit margins on the suit are down because he didn’t fully pass on his higher wholesale costs to consumers.

“If the dollar continues falling at the same levels, it will really hurt small retailers,” Kirschner said. “You can’t continue to absorb the price increases. You still have to pay the rent and basic expenses even though your margins are being squeezed.”
Harder for U.S. companies

Inflationary pressures are a real concern as prices of imported goods go up, economists said.

“Because imports are more expensive for us to buy, we have become a little less rich as a country,” said Lawrence White, professor of economics at New York University’s Stern School of Business. “Our resources buy less of the world’s resources. That is the real downside of currency depreciation.”

Ann Davis, assistant professor of economics at Marist College, said the declining dollar could make it harder for U.S. companies to make foreign acquisitions and also could make U.S. companies more susceptible to foreign takeovers.

“As the dollar weakens, some of the merger and acquisition business could shift to countries with stronger currencies,” Davis said. “The whole issue of New York City as a financial capital also is a little more up for grabs.”

A weak dollar, however, is not all bad.

On the positive side, U.S. exports become more competitive overseas as the dollar falls. That can help increase the sales and profits of large multinational companies that derive a big chunk of their orders in foreign markets.

For example, more than half the sales of IBM Corp. originate outside the United States. For PepsiCo Inc., international sales are about 37 percent of its business. During the second quarter, PepsiCo’s international profits grew 18 percent, more than four times faster than the profits in its North American beverage business.
“Some U.S. companies are doing well domestically and overseas,” said Charles Lieberman, chief investment officer at Advisors Capital Management in Paramus, N.J. “The weakness of the dollar enhances their competitive position.”

Highlights Of Ron Paul's Comments In Last Night's Debate

You Tube
Wednesday October 10, 2007

Telecom Immunity May Be in Spying Bill

PAMELA HESS
AP
Wednesday October 10, 2007

A top Democratic leader opened the door Tuesday to granting U.S. telecommunications companies retroactive legal immunity for helping the government conduct electronic surveillance without court orders, but said the Bush administration must first detail what those companies did.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., said providing the immunity will likely be the price of getting President Bush to sign into law new legislation extending the government's surveillance authority. About 40 pending lawsuits name telecommunications companies for alleged violations of wiretapping laws. Democrats introduced a draft version of the new law Tuesday — without the immunity language.

"We have not received documentation as to what in fact was done, for which we've been asked to give immunity," Hoyer said.

In a conference call with reporters, a senior Justice Department official called Hoyer's offer "encouraging" but would not commit to sharing the data. The official spoke only on condition of anonymity while negotiations with Congress continue.

The bill would replace a law enacted in August that is due to expire early next year. That bill was hastily adopted under pressure from the Bush administration, which said changes in technology had resulted in dire gaps in its authority to eavesdrop on terrorists.

Privacy and civil liberties advocates voiced strong concerns, saying the law gave the government far more power to eavesdrop on American communications without court oversight than was initially understood or appropriate.

The bill Democrats unveiled Tuesday would provide greater jurisdiction to a secret court that reviews government requests to carry out certain electronic surveillance, which goes against the administration's wishes.

Currently, U.S. intelligence isn't required to get court permission to eavesdrop on foreign targets communicating with other foreigners, even if those communications flow through U.S. telephone or computer switches.

If Americans are to be targeted for surveillance, however, the secret court must issue a warrant.

The central change the new bill would make is in a third category of surveillance. If the government wants to eavesdrop on a foreign target or group of targets located outside the United States, and there is a possibility they will be communicating with Americans, the government can get an "umbrella" or "blanket" court order for up to one year.

That order would have to explain how the collection of data would be minimized, and how much of the communication could be collected before a regular warrant would be needed to continue listening. That is to prevent the government from "reverse targeting" — that is, wiretapping a foreigner to listen in on their calls to an American, which would otherwise require a court's permission.

The American Civil Liberties Union said the approach is too lax, and that a warrant should be required anytime an American's communications are intercepted or archived for later examination.

In an emergency, the government could begin surveillance without a blanket order as long as it applies for court approval within seven days, under the Democratic bill.

The bill would also require the Justice Department to reveal to Congress the details of all electronic surveillance conducted without court orders since Sept. 11, 2001, including the so-called Terrorist Surveillance Program.

The Terrorist Surveillance Program was a secret eavesdropping program undertaken after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks without the approval of the FISA court created 30 years ago to monitor such programs.

The Bush administration agreed on Oct. 5 to "assemble" that information by Oct. 22 — after the bill is supposed to be voted on by Congress — but warned that many of the requested documents may be withheld.

White House denies leaking al-Qaeda info

AFP
Wednesday October 10, 2007

THE White House has denied being the source of a leak involving an Osama bin Laden video that a private intelligence firm said had sabotaged its secret ability to intercept al-Qaeda messages.

Asked if the White House was the source of the leak, spokeswoman Dana Perino overnight said: "No, we were not ... We were very concerned to learn about it."

The SITE Intelligence Group said it lost access that it had covertly acquired to al-Qaeda's communications network when the administration of US President George W. Bush let out that the company had obtained a bin Laden video early last month ahead of its official release, the Washington Post said.

"Techniques that took years to develop are now ineffective and worthless," SITE founder Rita Katz told the newspaper.

SITE monitors websites and public communications linked to radical Islamist groups and organisations deemed terrorist by US authorities and provides the information to clients, including news media companies.

It got hold of the bin Laden video before its release and provided it for free to the White House on the morning of September 7 but insisted that the video's existence remain secret until it spotted the official release, in order to protect its own work.

"Within 20 minutes, a range of intelligence agencies had begun downloading it from the company's website," the Post said.

By that afternoon the video and a transcript from it had been leaked to a cable television news network and broadcast worldwide, the Post reported.

According to Ms Katz, this tipped off Al-Qaeda that its communications security had been breached by SITE.

White House officials said the matter would be referred to the Director of National Intelligence, and that the White House was not planning any internal investigation.

"When the White House receives information from an individual or a company, we refer that appropriately to the intelligence community. That's what happened here," Ms Perino said.

"And I'll have to refer you to the Director on National Intelligence for any process problem they had in that regard."

Homeland security adviser Fran Townsend echoed Ms Perino's "concern" and referred the matter to the nation's spy chief.

"This is going to be an issue for the DNI to look at so that we can understand what, if anything, happened, and how to deal with it to ensure that we fully protect those who cooperate with us," Ms Townsend said.

"I haven't looked at the internal White House emails, so what I can tell you is the DNI and the Intelligence Committee will need to look at who had access to it.

She said: "We are only going to be successful in the war on terror with the help of the American people."

The video appeared to be timed to coincide with the sixth anniversary of the September 11 attacks on the United States, and was bin Laden's first video appearance since October 2004.

In it, the elusive Al-Qaeda chief mocked the United States as "weak" and vowed to escalate fighting in Iraq.

Taiwan says China military buildup is world threat

David Lague
International Herald Tribune
Wednesday October 10, 2007

Taiwan's President Chen Shui-bian warned in a national address Wednesday that China's military build-up was threatening world peace, and urged it to halt military exercising targeting the island.

In a National Day speech ahead of a parade aimed at underscoring Taiwan's defence capabilities, he also called on China to withdraw ballistic missiles that are aimed at the island.

"With China's rapid rise and relentless military build-up, the 'China threat' is no longer confined to confrontation across the Taiwan Strait. In fact, it has already seriously impacted world peace," he said.

Chen called on urged the international community to "strongly demand that China immediately withdraw missiles deployed along its southeastern coast targeted at Taiwan, stop military exercises simulating attacks on Taiwan."

The independence-leaning Chen accused Beijing of ignoring peace overtures and using "ever more belligerent rhetoric and military intimidation."

He said the tactics were "aimed at denigrating our nation, marginalizing it in the world, cultivating the perception that Taiwan is a local region of China, delegitimizing its government, and undermining its sovereignty."

"Only the people of Taiwan have the right to decide their nation's future," he added.

"Taiwan and the People's Republic of China are two sovereign, independent nations, and neither exercises jurisdiction over the other. This is a historical fact. This is the status quo across the Taiwan Strait."

Taiwan and China split in 1949 after the end of a civil war, but Beijing still regards Taiwan as part of its territory awaiting reunification, by force if necessary.

Everything You Need to Know about Disinformation in 2 Minutes

George Washington's Blog
Wednesday October 10, 2007

The topic of disinformation is a very complicated one. Essays, lengthy papers and whole treatises have been written on the subject. But the very length of most discussions overwhelms people, so that they never get an accurate picture of what disinformation looks like.

So I thought I'd take a crack at a very simple definition of disinformation, something that is short enough to read in two minutes.

Disinformation is:

* Repeating the same factual claims over and over even when people have proven that such claims are contrary to the evidence (for example, the claim that no planes hit the Twin Towers)

* Spending more energy causing in-fighting and disruptions then helping to promote the truth, and causing dedicated activists to waste time rebutting obviously false claims and theories

* Unnecessarily alienating large sections of the population by attacking victims' families, certain religious or ethnic groups, or political parties with no reason

* Calling someone names instead of addressing that person's theories or claimed facts

* Making knowingly false statements about someone

* Threatening people or their families with violence, job loss, or other forms of intimidation or harassment

* Acting as provocateurs to disrupt peaceful groups or gatherings

People who repeatedly do one of the above things even after people have pointed out what they are doing, are spreading disinformation -- consciously or unconsciously. Indeed, because disinformation may be an unconscious activity, I prefer to call it "disruption". These actions disrupt the ability to spread 9/11 truth and to obtain justice against all of those who carried out the attack.

No matter how much seemingly good 9/11 truth work someone has done in the past, if someone starts causing more disruption than good, than he or she should not be followed any more. This is especially true if people have pointed out that person's disruptive behavior, but he or she has carried on disrupting 9/11 truth work anyway.

NATO, U.S. Aiding PKK Terrorists In Turkey

Attempt to crush democratic process, say newspapers
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Turkish newspapers have slammed NATO for its support of the PKK terrorist organization, while also alleging that U.S. forces are arming the militant group in Iraq, as part of an agenda to crush the democratic process and prevent the election of a populist government in Turkey.

The PKK is listed as a terrorist organization by the U.S., the EU and NATO itself. The group espouses Marxist leanings and its goal is to create a socialist Kurdish state encompassing south-eastern Turkey, north-eastern Iraq, north-eastern Syria and north-western Iran. The group has been fingered as the culprit of thousands of bombings, assassinations, kidnappings and acts of sabotage over the past 20 years.

Allegations of international support to the PKK are long-standing. According to a report in the London Telegraph, Kurdish guerrillas are being funded by the U.S. to wage a clandestine war in north-western Iran.

The Turkish daily Zaman has accused NATO of supporting the PKK as part of a plan to destabilize Turkish elections and prevent a new Turkish constitution from being drawn up.

"Forces linked to NATO are trying to crush the democratic process of the Turkish presidential election by pushing the PKK (Kurdish Workers Party) to increase its attacks," reports Press TV.

"During the two months leading to the presidential election, around 100 Turkish soldiers or security personnel have been killed in clashes with the PKK. PKK's most recent attacks have left 26 people dead, 12 of them civilians."

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's demand that NATO target the PKK has consistently fallen on deaf ears, leading Turkey to threaten an invasion of northern Iraq to quell the crisis.

NATO has a long and bloody history of fostering terrorism in order to safeguard its geopolitical agenda.

Parliamentary investigations in Italy confirmed that NATO had created "stay-behind armies" during and after the Cold War, ostensibly to repel a Soviet invasion of the west, but that this was merely a smokescreen for perpetrating violent acts of terrorism in order to install right-wing governments around Europe, in accordance with a CIA directive to launch a "strategy of tension."

'You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force ... the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security," testified former Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra.

We do battle with words, not guns

Michael Hampton
Homeland Stupidity
Wednesday October 10, 2007

Here at Homeland Stupidity, no government cow is sacred. Waste, fraud, abuse, plain incompetence, and bad policy are all fair game. As a result, government officials in the higher pay grades tend to be displeased with what they read here. As a general rule, the higher the pay grade, the more displeased.

Therefore, I was not at all surprised to hear that high-ranking officials in the U.S. Marshals Service were upset with Sunday’s published story regarding their Office of Protective Intelligence. I was, however, surprised to spot two surveillance teams while going about my business Tuesday night.

Before I get into that, though, I want to make a clarification regarding the Department of Justice inspector general’s report (PDF) on the OPI which was published last Wednesday. The report does state that “USMS’s efforts to improve its capabilities to assess reported threats and identify potential threats languished” between 2004 and early 2007, with a significant backlog of reported threats to be assessed in 2006. In fairness to the rank and file, the report also states that they cleared the backlogs and that OPI is revising its threat assessment process to be faster and more efficient. Those changes are set to take place this month.

However, the report also notes that there is no formal process in place “to develop protective intelligence that identifies potential threats against the judiciary. . . . USMS was slow to staff the protective intelligence function and has not developed a strategy to effectively collect, analyze, and share information.” This means that USMS’s ability to identify previously unknown threats is limited. Since, as the report acknowledges, less than 10 percent of individuals who “attacked or approached to attack a prominent public figure” communicated a threat beforehand, developing this capability is critical to providing effective protection.

As you’ll recall, an OPI inspector is here in New Hampshire attempting to assess Manchester resident Rob Jacobs. That is, of course, after he assessed several completely unrelated people who just happen to be Free State Project members. Jacobs and the inspector have yet to meet in person, as they have been unable to agree on a meeting place. After marshals failed to meet with him on Saturday, Jacobs attempted to set up a second meeting for Tuesday evening, which the inspector declined to attend. He apparently objected to the venue, Murphy’s Taproom, a local restaurant where Free State Project members regularly meet.

Tuesday evening at Murphy’s Taproom, instead of the inspector, several of us spoke to a local reporter, who wrote a more neutral story than this one.

Jacobs said he supports the Browns’ cause and has visited their home many times in the past year. He said he has never seen Ed Brown’s supposed hit list and said he does not know anyone who might be planning to harm government officials. . . .

Keith Murphy, owner of Murphy’s Tap Room and a member of the Free State Project, said many Free Staters who already have come to New Hampshire supported the Browns’ crusade against the federal income tax. They were turned off, however, as Ed Brown’s rhetoric became increasingly violent and after he told reporters all of the world’s problems are the fault of Freemasons and Jews.

“We are ’small L’ Libertarians,” Murphy said of the Free Staters. “We believe violence is inherently wrong. It’s not in our nature.” — Manchester Union Leader

We certainly need to do away with the whole sorry system of income taxation. Just throw Title 26 out. (And a few billion useless pork-barrel government programs along with it.) But doing violence to government officials won’t get rid of the income tax, and it will result in crackdowns the likes of which we haven’t seen in this country in recent memory, or perhaps ever.

Interestingly, those same high-ranking government officials are upset at the level of publicity this story has been getting in general, and especially with the publication of videos documenting the experiences of the people here who feel they were harassed and threatened by the marshals and “Treasury agents.” It’s been my experience that, for the most part, it’s the bad apples in government who object to having their actions publicized.

And perhaps the surveillance teams at Murphy’s got wind of some of this. Among the people they got to see while the Republican debate played on the TV screens were a state representative, an off-duty police officer planning a run for state representative next year, two local candidates for alderman in two different wards in the city, several individuals starting a newspaper, local Republican and Democratic party officials, and a couple dozen quite ordinary people who are sick and tired of big government spending their children into debt and invading their private lives at every turn.

Ideas, they say, are bulletproof. And the idea of freedom, to be left alone when you’ve harmed nobody and to have no more government than is necessary to protect your right to be left alone when you’ve harmed nobody, has persisted throughout human history. The income tax flies in the face of everything we understand about what it means to be free. It is indeed a form of slavery, involuntary servitude of the worst kind: the fruits of your labor are not only taken by force, they are taken by a group of strangers you have no effective way to reason or plead with. It will eventually be swept into the dustbin of history along with many other methods of tyranny which have preceded it.

But the battle is for the hearts and minds of those enslaved by it, many of whom don’t even know they are enslaved, and whom along with us would be freed. It is a battle of ideas. Bullets have no place here. It is the state which uses bullets and other means of violence to enforce its tyranny over the people. This is why freedom will ultimately prevail: the state’s bad ideas and their bad actions cannot stand in the harsh light of day.

Security guards fired randomly: Iraq official

Aseel Kami
Reuters
Wednesday October 10, 2007

Iraqi officials on Wednesday accused guards working for a foreign security company of firing randomly when they killed two women in the latest incident involving private security contractors that has outraged Iraqis.

Family members prepared to bury the two women in the New Baghdad district of the Iraqi capital a day after the shooting on Tuesday at a Baghdad intersection involving guards working for Australian-owned, Dubai-based Unity Resources Group.

The company said it deeply regretted the incident and that a vehicle had failed to stop despite warnings.

Brigadier-General Qassim Moussawi, spokesman for Baghdad security, said the women encountered a convoy of four-wheel-drive vehicles when they drove up to an intersection in Baghdad's Karrada district.

"It opened fire randomly, targeting an Oldsmobile vehicle being driven by a woman. The incident made the two women martyrs," Moussawi told Reuters.

Unity Resources Group said in a statement on its Web site that it deeply regretted the incident. It has not yet answered telephone calls or emails to its offices in Baghdad and Dubai.

It statement said its security team was approached at speed by a vehicle which did not stop despite warnings which included hand signals and signal flares, after which shots were fired.

One witness said a warning shot was fired and the security guards opened fire when the driver continued to edge forward.

Many Iraqis see private security companies as little more than private armies which act with impunity. They are still angry over a September 16 shooting involving U.S. firm Blackwater in which 17 people were killed.

Moussawi said Iraqi police and military were investigating the incident and urged the women's relatives to bring charges against the company.

The company has worked in Iraq since 2004 and employs former special forces and tactical police drawn from the United States, Britain, Australia and New Zealand. Its security escorts typically include Iraqi guards with foreign team leaders.

U.S. embassy officials have said the company had a contractual relationship with a U.S. non-government organization but did not elaborate.

CONTRACTORS UNDER SPOTLIGHT

The Blackwater shooting brought private security contractors under the spotlight, with the incident now the subject of at least four investigations by Iraqi and U.S. officials.

Between 25,000 and 48,000 private security guards work in Iraq under a 2004 law, drawn up while Iraq was still under U.S. administration, which gives them immunity from Iraqi law.

"We look at the security companies as a mafia, not as security companies working to make the situation more secure for the people, or even the delegations they are guarding," said a Baghdad resident who gave his name only as Qais.

"People run away from them, they are afraid to cross the street in front of them," he told Reuters.

The Blackwater shooting highlighted what some industry representatives have described as the ambiguous status under which they work, with many firms not holding valid licenses.

The Iraqi government has accused Blackwater of "deliberately killing" the 17 Iraqis in last month's shooting in west Baghdad. A government source has said the government wants Blackwater to pay $8 million compensation to each victim's family.

Blackwater employs about 1,000 people in Iraq and guards U.S. embassy and State Department officials. It says its guards responded lawfully to a threat against a convoy it was protecting.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has ordered tighter controls on Blackwater, including putting cameras on the company's vehicles and ensuring diplomatic security agents accompany and monitor each convoy.

(Additional reporting by Yasser Faisal in Baghdad)

Jaywalkers smarting after rude encounter with cops

ROBERT L. JAMIESON Jr.
Seattle Post-Intelligencer
October 9, 2007

As infractions go, jaywalking is minor. It’s not the sort of thing anyone expects will lead to scrapes, bruises and a night in jail. But what happened to Benjamin De Jong and his girlfriend after a Mariners game Sept. 15 is more than a simple case of jaywalking.

“Police brutality is more like it,” contends the 22-year-old, who was visiting from British Columbia when he got a lasting memory of Seattle, courtesy of police.

De Jong admits he and his girlfriend jaywalked across First Avenue in Pioneer Square — just like a throng always does after a sporting event. They were on the heels of friends who forged into traffic just ahead of them that evening, heading to the J&M Cafe.

“As we were 5 to 10 feet from the curb, an unmarked vehicle sped toward us,” De Jong said. “He hammered on his brakes. Two guys jumped out wearing dark clothing.”

Put yourself in De Jong’s shoes. One second you are about to join friends at a pub after going to see a Mariners game. The next, you’re terrified about who might be storming out of a strange van just feet away. Thugs? Thieves? A driver with road rage?

Nope. Try cops — though De Jong insists he and his girlfriend couldn’t tell the men were officers. “They never said to us, ‘Stop, this is Seattle police,’ or that they wanted to talk to us,” De Jong said. “You know how cops in movies show badges? Nothing like that happened. I thought they wanted to fight.”

The Seattle Police Department’s internal affairs unit is now looking at the case.

De Jong — 5 feet 7 inches tall and 150 pounds — said one of the men from the van grabbed him from behind and brusquely turned him around. He said he saw the second man from the van jerk his 105-pound girlfriend by the arm like a rag doll.

“Yes, I used choice words that night,” De Jong said. “Any guy would if he saw what was happening to his woman and thought a couple of thugs were doing it.”

De Jong was tossed on the ground. His knees got bruised. Blood oozed from his elbows. He was handcuffed and taken to jail. He faces pedestrian interference and obstructing charges. His girlfriend, Kristen Heidt, also 22 and from Canada, was roughed up; bruises were left on her body — and she has photos. She was not taken to jail or charged, even though a police report says she grabbed an officer during the confrontation. Heidt remains shaken up.

The incident is the latest to raise questions about Seattle police conduct — in which civilians accuse cops of failing to identify themselves and being unprofessional and in which officers’ police reports don’t square with victims’ accounts.

This summer, undercover Seattle police in an unmarked car shot at Jesse Toro II, who thought the police were gang-bangers trying to hurt him after a traffic dispute. Toro says at no point did the vice-unit officers show badges or flash police lights.

Last month, 21-year-old Andrew Rutherford ended up bloodied and in the hospital after an off-duty Seattle officer in a civilian car pulled over the Jeep carrying Rutherford and his friends in West Seattle. Rutherford says the officer pulled out a gun, never showed his badge and didn’t immediately identify himself. He and his friends thought they were being carjacked — until uniformed cops stampeded in.

Now comes the case of De Jong and his girlfriend, who came to town just to cheer on De Jong’s kin — Mariners pitcher Chris Reitsma.

Seattle police Capt. Steve Brown confirmed last week that the two officers were riding in an unmarked van and wearing standard uniforms, though he called back later to clarify a point: One of the officers wore a police jacket over his shirt.

Brown conceded De Jong and his girlfriend “may not have immediately recognized (the officers) because they were in a plain car.” He added De Jong was “intoxicated and belligerent.”

De Jong, however, said he had a few beers over the course of the evening — but wasn’t drunk. Either way, the police report makes no mention of drunkenness. “If I was drunk,” De Jong said, “put it in the report.” The report also claims the officers didn’t rush the couple but “walked over.”

The Police Department encourages officers to contact jaywalkers, but not necessarily issue citations.

“It doesn’t mean that a ticket has to be written, and it certainly doesn’t mean that a pedestrian is going to be put on the ground,” Brown said. “I think the pedestrian determines what the outcome will be.”

Yes, but cops determine outcomes, too. Officers are trained to identify themselves and de-escalate situations so jaywalking doesn’t end with someone getting jacked up.

De Jong is considering a lawsuit — as a matter of principle. His aim: better policing. He wonders how many others have been roughed up by overzealous officers.

His family says the City Attorney’s Office floated a deal: De Jong can agree to community service and alcohol counseling and the whole thing can go away. But they believe this is nothing more than a shameless attempt to cover up police misconduct, “a big joke,” they say.

They’re so right, it isn’t even funny.

CCTV reveals Menezes’ final moments

James Macintyre
The Independent
October 9, 2007

Jean Charles de Menezes was shown picking up a morning paper and walking calmly through Stockwell Tube station in the moments before he was shot dead on the Underground by police, in CCTV footage released last night.

Contrary to reports at the time, Menezes – who had been mistaken by police for a suicide bomber – was not running and did not jump over the ticket barriers, the newly released footage clearly showed.

The first images of Menezes in the build-up to his death came after a police officer present at the shooting described the “shocking” moments that the innocent Brazilian was pinned down and then shot seven times in the head. The surveillance officer, codenamed Ivor, told the Old Bailey that the incident – which came in the aftermath of an attempted “second wave” of attacks on the Tube following the 7 July bombings in 2005 – was distressing to passengers on the Northern Line train.

Ivor described how he moved into action “instinctively” after Menezes got up from his seat. He told the jury: “I grabbed Menezes, wrapping both my arms around the torso, pinning his arms against his side, pushing him back to the seat with the right-hand side of my head against the right-hand side of his torso, pinning him to the seat.

“He appeared to stiffen up. He was not in a natural sitting position but he was back in the seat where he had been sitting. After a few moments I felt his head turn towards me. I was aware of a CO19 officer kneeling on the seat to my left. I heard a gunshot very close to my left ear and was hit by a shockwave of a gun being discharged.”

At one point, the officer said, he was apparently mistaken for a suspect himself amid chaotic scenes in which he found himself with a gun being turned on him. “I was aware that the long-barrelled weapon was levelled at my chest and the barrel of a gun was at my head,” he said. “Given this, I held out my hands and shouted ‘police’.”

By chance, the plain-clothes officer was dressed “virtually identically” to Menezes in jeans, a denim jacket and trainers. He was then dragged away from the scene before putting his black police cap on.

“I could hear several gunshots and shouting and screaming, but nothing more specific,” Ivor said. “The scene was extremely violent, extremely noisy and obviously distressing.

“Members of the public were emptying the carriage, obviously in distress. There was a lot of gunsmoke. It was obviously a shocking incident.”

The officer described the immediate thinking that led to his decision to accost Menezes. “Given the nature of the subject we were deployed against, I had to make an assessment within seconds. I was concerned that his hands may come together and instinctively pinned his hands to his side.

“I was obviously concerned that he may be carrying arms or had explosives in his possession which could be a threat to the public on the carriage.”

Police had waited outside Menezes’s home in Scotia Road, south London – an address that, according to police, had been connected to the 21 July attempted bomber Hussain Osman – before following him on to two buses and then into Stockwell Tube station.

The police were uncertain as to the identity of Menezes. Ivor told the court: “I requested via my radio whether or not Menezes should be detained. I received the reply that I should wait.”

He added: “I was certainly in a position to effect some sort of detention of Menezes.”

The Office of the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police denies a single charge of exposing the public to risk in breach of health and safety legislation.

The hearing is set to continue today.

*********************************************************************

VIDEO

New EU treaty seen same as Constitution

Reuters
Tuesday October 09, 2007

MPs gave ammunition to campaigners for a referendum on a new European Union treaty on Tuesday by saying the treaty was substantially the same as the defunct EU Constitution.

The government promised a referendum on the Constitution, rejected by French and Dutch voters in 2005. But it has resisted calls for a referendum on the new treaty on the grounds that it is far less ambitious.

Parliament's all-party European Scrutiny Committee concluded in a report that the effect of the entire new treaty was "substantially equivalent" to that of the Constitution.

The country, however, has won an exemption from the legal force of a Charter of Fundamental Rights, which enshrines broad labour rights that London fears could undermine its trade union laws.

t also won the right not to join police and judicial cooperation.

The Conservatives' Europe spokesman Mark Francois said in view of the committee's conclusions, Brown was "morally bound" to offer Britons a referendum.

But Europe Minister Jim Murphy insisted that the new treaty was "significantly different to the old constitutional treaty in intent, form and substance" and that the version the country would sign up to was even further from the old Constitution.

The treaty provides for a long-term EU president, a stronger foreign policy chief and a more democratic voting system.

The committee also complained that the new treaty had been drawn up in a "secretive" way.