Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Existing home sales fall for eighth month

Existing home sales fall for eighth month

Median U.S. home price dropped by record amount in October
The Associated Press
updated 10:05 a.m. ET, Wed., Nov. 28, 2007

WASHINGTON - Sales of existing homes fell for the eighth consecutive month in October, with median home prices falling by a record amount. Analysts blamed the worsening housing slump on the serious credit crunch that hit in August.

The National Association of Realtors reported that sales of existing single-family homes and condominiums dropped by 1.2 percent last month to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.97 million units.

The median price of a home sold last month declined to $207,800, a drop of 5.1 percent from a year ago, the biggest year-over-year price decline on record.

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22006839/

World spooked by declining U.S. dollar

Duncan Cameron
Rabble
November 27, 2007

The world economy has been built on a major fault line: a national currency, the U.S. dollar, which is also the world monetary unit. The two different roles played by the American dollar have become increasingly incompatible. Today, low U.S. interest rates are needed to reduce recessionary pressures in the American domestic economy. But, lowering U.S. interest rates has made the U.S. dollar less attractive as an investment vehicle for foreign businesses, banks, and governments, rendering it unsuitable as world money, an international storehouse of value.

Developments in financial markets in recent months have brought the dilemma of using the U.S. dollar as the world currency back to the forefront of issues that need to be addressed. Commentators are so far taking stock of the bad news, but not addressing what needs to be done.

If central banks and finance ministries around the world know what to do next, so far they have kept it to themselves.

The bad news is that the U.S. economy is going into a recession. Since it is the world’s largest importer, its economic slowdown will hit others as well. With the U.S. dollar at record lows against the Euro, and recent lows against the Yen, U.S. purchases abroad are bound to fall precipitately.

The worse news is that the trouble in U.S. financial markets could be amplified by the recession, putting U.S. banks and financial institutions in an even weaker position than today. Loss of confidence in dollar-based assets will cause ever greater disruptions in financial markets abroad.

Those countries that have been selling more to the U.S., than they have been buying from the U.S., have, until now, accumulated surplus dollars, and placed them in U.S financial markets. But, since July, purchases of U.S. securities by foreign governments have dropped dramatically, driving the U.S. dollar down, and making financial markets more fragile.

Everybody who holds U.S. dollars or securities is losing money, and stands to lose more when, to fight recession, American interest rates go down again, and the U.S. dollar plunges even further.

The U.S. Treasury Department says it is pursuing a strong dollar policy, which no body believes. The U.S. Federal Reserve makes monetary policy to suit the domestic economy, not the overseas holders of U.S. dollars.

The U.S. policy response to the falling dollar has been to blame those countries, principally China, and other emerging economies, which have continued to peg their currencies to the U.S. dollar, rather than allow their currencies to rise. To avoid a domestic recession, the U.S. wants poorer economies to slow down. China remains unconvinced. Why should it adjust to U.S. needs?

For the past 60 years the U.S. has enjoyed the imperial privilege of having its money accepted all over the world, giving it the ability to buy real assets with its own money. The world held U.S. dollars as financial assets, and the U.S. dollar was used to calculate prices, and make payments throughout a world banking, and financial network.

Because there was a requirement for foreigners spending abroad to earn U.S. currency through international trade, but no requirement for U.S. spenders to earn foreign currency, the world had adopted a dollar standard.

Today, because of U.S. over-spending abroad, many businesses, banks, and governments are moving out of dollars and into Euros, British Pounds, or, even Swiss Francs or Yen. Investors are buying art, and real property outside the U.S., which have become more attractive investments than dollar denominated assets. However, by diversifying out of the dollar, investors only reduce its value further. The U.S. authorities have no back up plan to stop the U.S. dollar from shrinking in value even more.

The market is not going to fix the problems created by using a national currency as the world money. What is needed is a plan to create a genuine world currency to settle debts among central banks. At Bretton Woods, in 1944, John Maynard Keynes presented a plan for such a currency. He called it the “bancor.” His ideas were rejected. American bankers did not want to give up their lucrative business of trading dollars on foreign exchanges.

The world needs a truly international monetary unit, because the dollar cannot fulfill its international role, and replacing it with the Euro will not resolve the contradiction of using a central bank currency to fulfill two roles, one internal and one on the world stage.

Consider a continental currency, Jarislowsky says

STEVEN CHASE
Globe & Mail
Wednesday November 28, 2007

OTTAWA -- Canada should replace its dollar with a North American currency, or peg it to the U.S. greenback, to avoid the exchange rate shifts the loonie has experienced, renowned money manager Stephen Jarislowsky told a parliamentary committee yesterday.

"In a country like Canada we cannot permit ourselves to have a dollar that goes through these kind of gyrations," Mr. Jarislowsky told MPs on the Commons finance committee. " I think we have to really seriously start thinking of the model of a continental currency just like Europe."

MPs on the finance committee are probing the consequences of the strengthened loonie - which has risen more than 20 per cent against the U.S. greenback this year.

Mr. Jarislowsky, a former Canfor Corp. director, said the loonie's rise to above par with the U.S. dollar is destroying manufacturing and could devastate the forest sector.

"We don't have a single mill in Canada which isn't losing cash at the current exchange rate despite the fact we invested hundreds of millions in dollars into new equipment when we had the money," said Mr. Jarislowsky, chairman of Montreal investment firm Jarislowsky Fraser Ltd.

"I believe that if we stay at the present levels the entire forest products industry practically is going to be in liquidation-bankruptcy and there's going to be an enormous loss of employment."

He scorned suggestions that now is a great time to invest in new equipment because the stronger loonie can buy more.

Full article here.

U.S. Mortgage Crisis Slams Property Values, State Tax Receipts

Cryptogon
November 27th, 2007

Via: Bloomberg:

The worst U.S. housing recession in 16 years will drive down property values by $1.2 trillion next year and slash tax revenue by more than $6.6 billion, according to a report by the U.S. Conference of Mayors.

California, the hardest-hit state, will suffer a $630.6 billion decrease in property values that will cut property tax revenue to local governments by almost $3 billion, the study found. The New York City region will see the greatest slowdown in the output of goods and services because of the mortgage crisis, according to the report.

The U.S. residential real estate market is faltering as rising foreclosures among subprime borrowers have pushed down prices and led to a record supply of unsold homes. Foreclosures among homeowners with subprime adjustable-rate mortgages have reached a five-year high.

“The real estate crisis of 2007 and 2008 will go down in the record books,” according to the report, released as the Conference of Mayors gathers in Detroit today for a special meeting to discuss the housing slump. “The wave of foreclosures that has rippled across the U.S. has already battered some of our largest financial institutions, created ghost towns of once vibrant neighborhoods — and it’s not over yet.”

Signs Are Pointing South on Wall St.

Neil Irwin
Washington Post
November 27, 2007

Credit Woes Foster Bets on Bad Times

Wall Street is betting on a recession.

Investors in stocks and bonds are paying prices that indicate they believe a snowballing housing crisis and worsening credit crunch will soon tip the U.S. economy into a recession, analysts said. Many economists, including leaders of the Federal Reserve, don’t think things will get that bad, but some say the risk of a serious downturn has risen in recent weeks.

Investors were so eager to buy ultra-safe government bonds yesterday that they were willing to accept sharply lower interest rates. The rate on the 10-year Treasury bond fell to 3.84 percent from 4 percent Friday. The low rates indicate investors expect the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates aggressively in the coming year to ease the pain of recession.

Stocks are now down more than 10 percent from their peak in October. The Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index fell 2.3 percent yesterday, dropping the market to a level that Wall Street analysts say reflects an expectation that corporate profits will fall.

Taken together, those and other data indicate that financial markets have a decidedly negative prognosis for the economy. “They’re saying the odds of a recession are pretty damn high,” said Diane Swonk, chief economist at Mesirow Financial.

There are reasons to think things will not get that bad, however. Holiday sales started Friday with a strong 8.3 percent gain over last year, and U.S. consumers have proven resilient in past periods of financial distress. With the dollar weakening, U.S. exporters will be at an advantage; joblessness remains near historic lows, at 4.7 percent; and the stock market, an old joke goes, has predicted nine of the past five recessions.

Moreover, economic growth could slow sharply through the first half of next year, as the Federal Reserve and myriad private firms predict, without technically falling into recession territory. A recession is defined as a significant decline in economic activity, as measured by a variety of indicators, that lasts more than a few months. The nonprofit Conference Board said yesterday that its index of leading economic indicators fell in October, but not by so much as to suggest a recession is about to begin.

Other events yesterday showed how widely worry has spread.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York said it would make at least $8 billion available so banks do not find themselves short of cash through early January. Former Treasury secretary Lawrence Summers said in a column in yesterday’s Financial Times that he now believes the odds favor a recession, a view he did not hold a few weeks ago.

Housing prices are falling sharply in many of the nation’s biggest cities, and millions of foreclosures are forecast for the next two years. Oil prices are near $100 per barrel, which could thin out consumers’ pocketbooks if the winter is especially cold. And as the value of the dollar drops, imports as varied as French wine and Japanese electronics could become more expensive.

In a view increasingly typical among Wall Street economists, analysts at Merrill Lynch published a research note yesterday with the headline: “We believe we are going to see a recession in ‘08.”

Widespread expectations of a recession could be self-fulfilling because of how financial markets and mainstream America are interconnected. If investors are sufficiently convinced a recession is ahead, they would be reluctant to lend money to businesses that want to expand, making it so.

Just a month ago, financial markets seemed to be healing from the tumult of the summer, when fear of losses in the mortgage sector caused many markets to effectively shut down. But throughout November, the very institutions that were expected to ease the blow to the economy have shown more evidence of trouble.

Investors are worried that major banks are suffering such severe losses from mortgage and other risky securities that they will not be able to lend as much money to consumers and businesses in the months ahead. The same fears apply to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored housing finance companies.

“It looked like the problems in the credit markets were going away or at least calming down a few weeks ago,” said David A. Wyss, chief economist of Standard & Poor’s. “Now the signs are that they’re not.”

The credit problems are no abstraction. They make it more expensive for individuals to obtain mortgages and for businesses to expand.

Higher interest rates for risky mortgages, for example, could make it difficult for would-be buyers to afford a home, which could cause prices to drop further. That, in turn, could spur more foreclosures, which could lead financial institutions to further increase rates they charge on mortgages.

“These things feed off of each other,” Wyss said.

The same is true for businesses. Continuing expansion of the commercial real estate sector, for example, including office buildings and shopping centers, has been a major cushion from the housing downturn in recent months and has kept construction workers employed.

In February, owners could borrow against such properties at interest rates about one percentage point above the rate for Treasury bonds, based on a Morgan Stanley index for moderately risky commercial mortgage-backed securities. At the end of September, commercial property owners had to pay an additional four percentage points. By yesterday, the premium was seven percentage points.

Higher borrowing costs could make commercial builders less likely to move forward with new construction, analysts said, eliminating a crucial source of growth in jobs and in the gross domestic product.

The potential freeze in bank lending could mirror the savings and loan crisis of the early 1990s, a major cause of the 1990-91 recession.

“In any recession, you get to a tipping point where sentiment unravels and feeds on itself. Psychology takes over,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Economy.com.

Clinton I haven't considered possibility of losing Dem nomination

David Edwards and Jason Rhyne
Raw Story
Tuesday November 27, 2007

Clinton says 'it's time' for aggressive campaign
The much-discussed "inevitability" factor is widely regarded as a major strength for New York Sen. Hillary Clinton and her bid for the Democratic presidential nomination -- and the senator herself appears to be buying in.

In an interview with Katie Couric on the CBS Evening News, Clinton was asked how "disappointed" she would be if she wasn't her party's eventual nominee for president.

"Well, it will be me," Clinton shot back. "But of course, I'm ready to support the Democratic nominee, whoever it is."

Pressed by Couric about whether she had considered the possibility of seeing another Democrat in the general election, Clinton was dismissive.

"No, I haven't," said the senator. "You know, when you get up every day like I do and you go out and meet hundreds and thousands of people and you talk about yourself, and you talk about your dreams and hopes for the country... that takes up all my time and energy, to just keep presenting myself and my candidacy. So I get up every day intending to meet and reach as many as people as possible -- then I go to bed at night and I get up and do it all over again."

"So you never even consider the possibility?" repeated Couric.

"I don't. I don't," Clinton responded.

The former first lady also fielded a question about the new "aggressive tone" her campaign appears to have adopted.

"Well, it's time," said Clinton of her toughening rhetoric about her Democratic rivals. "I have absorbed a lot of attacks for several months now. My opponents have basically had a free reign...but after you've been attacked as often as I have -- from several of my opponents -- you can't just absorb it. You have to respond."

Clinton has stepped up criticisms of fellow Democratic presidential contenders in recent days, and targeted Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) last week for asserting that his time living abroad as a child was a part of his foreign relations experience.

"Voters will have to judge if living in a foreign country at the age of 10 prepares one to face the big, complex international challenges the next president will face," Clinton had said. "I was wondering which world leader told her that we needed to invade Iraq," was Obama's retort.

"A lot of the attacks have been quite persistent shall we say," Clinton told Couric in the interview, describing critical comments from she says come from Republicans and Democrats alike. "Hardly a day goes by when I'm not attacked. And I just figure that it's about time now for me to draw the contrasts, which I think are pretty important to voters. And that's what I'm going to do."


This video is from CBS Evening News, broadcast on November 26, 2007.

We Are Change Ireland Attempts to Confront Bill Clinton

Kurt Nimmo
TruthNews
Wednesday November 28, 2007

Two members of We Are Change Ireland attempted to confront Bill Clinton, who visited their country on a fund-raising tour on behalf of his wife, selected by the elite to serve as our next ruler here in America.

“While Bill Clinton was in Ireland to Fundraise for Hillary and the continuation of the Bush/Clinton dynasty, We Are Change Ireland tried to confront him,” a blurb on YouTube explains. “Clinton didn’t get out of his vehicle and walk down the ‘runway’… but he got the message loud and clear that everybody is waking up to the New World Order jig.”

One of the two We Are Change Ireland activists yelled at Clinton, who was seated in the rear of a mini-van: “Investigate 9/11!” Clinton smiles and turned away as the vehicle moved past. It was obvious by the brief expression on Clinton’s face that he heard the demand.

After the short event, one of the activists explained how he intended to ask Clinton about professor Carroll Quigley, the former president’s political mentor at Georgetown University in the 1960s. In his book, The Anglo-American Establishment, Quigley details how the elitist duopoly long ago hijacked the political process in the United States and thus decimated the political paradigm held by a majority of the public, who are naturally clueless.

In addition, the Irish activists wanted to ask Clinton about his appearance at a Bilderberg meeting in 1991, the year before he was elected.

Clinton, however, after a brief exchange with We Are Change Minnesota in late October, has probably had enough of the common folk asking impromptu questions.

120 War Vets Commit Suicide Each Week

Penny Coleman
AlterNet
November 26, 2007.

Earlier this year, using the clout that only major broadcast networks seem capable of mustering, CBS News contacted the governments of all 50 states requesting their official records of death by suicide going back 12 years. They heard back from 45 of the 50. From the mountains of gathered information, they sifted out the suicides of those Americans who had served in the armed forces. What they discovered is that in 2005 alone — and remember, this is just in 45 states — there were at least 6,256 veteran suicides, 120 every week for a year and an average of 17 every day.

As the widow of a Vietnam vet who killed himself after coming home, and as the author of a book for which I interviewed dozens of other women who had also lost husbands (or sons or fathers) to PTSD and suicide in the aftermath of the war in Vietnam, I am deeply grateful to CBS for undertaking this long overdue investigation. I am also heartbroken that the numbers are so astonishingly high and tentatively optimistic that perhaps now that there are hard numbers to attest to the magnitude of the problem, it will finally be taken seriously. I say tentatively because this is an administration that melts hard numbers on their tongues like communion wafers.

Since these new wars began, and in spite of a continuous flood of alarming reports, the Department of Defense has managed to keep what has clearly become an epidemic of death beneath the radar of public awareness by systematically concealing statistics about soldier suicides. They have done everything from burying them on official casualty lists in a category they call “accidental noncombat deaths” to outright lying to the parents of dead soldiers. And the Department of Veterans Affairs has rubber-stamped their disinformation, continuing to insist that their studies indicate that soldiers are killing themselves, not because of their combat experiences, but because they have “personal problems.”

Active-duty soldiers, however, are only part of the story. One of the well-known characteristics of post-traumatic stress injuries is that the onset of symptoms is often delayed, sometimes for decades. Veterans of World War II, Korea and Vietnam are still taking their own lives because new PTSD symptoms have been triggered, or old ones retriggered, by stories and images from these new wars. Their deaths, like the deaths of more recent veterans, are written up in hometown newspapers; they are locally mourned, but officially ignored. The VA doesn’t track or count them. It never has. Both the VA and the Pentagon deny that the problem exists and sanctimoniously point to a lack of evidence they have refused to gather.

They have managed this smoke and mirrors trick for decades in large part because suicide makes people so uncomfortable. It has often been called “that most secret death” because no one wants to talk about it. Over time, in different parts of the world, attitudes have fluctuated between the belief that the act is a sin, a right, a crime, a romantic gesture, an act of consummate bravery or a symptom of mental illness. It has never, however, been an emotionally neutral issue. In the United States, the rationalism of our legal system has acknowledged for 300 years that the act is almost always symptomatic of a mental illness. For those same 300 years, organized religions have stubbornly maintained that it’s a sin. In fact, the very worst sin. The one that is never forgiven because it’s too late to say you’re sorry.

The contradiction between religious doctrine and secular law has left suicide in some kind of nether space in which the fundamentals of our systems of justice and belief are disrupted. A terrible crime has been committed, a murder, and yet there can be no restitution, no punishment. As sin or as mental illness, the origins of suicide live in the mind, illusive, invisible, associated with the mysterious, the secretive and the undisciplined, a kind of omnipresent Orange Alert. Beware the abnormal. Beware the Other.

For years now, this administration has been blasting us with high-decibel, righteous posturing about suicide bombers, those subhuman dastards who do the unthinkable, using their own bodies as lethal weapons. “Those people, they aren’t like us; they don’t value life the way we do,” runs the familiar xenophobic subtext: And sometimes the text isn’t even sub-: “Many terrorists who kill innocent men, women, and children on the streets of Baghdad are followers of the same murderous ideology that took the lives of our citizens in New York, in Washington and Pennsylvania,” proclaimed W, glibly conflating Sept. 11, the invasion of Iraq, Islam, fanatic fundamentalism and human bombs.

Bush has also expressed the opinion that suicide bombers are motivated by despair, neglect and poverty. The demographic statistics on suicide bombers suggest that this isn’t the necessarily the case. Most of the Sept. 11 terrorists came from comfortable middle- to upper-middle-class families and were well-educated. Ironically, despair, neglect and poverty may be far more significant factors in the deaths of American soldiers and veterans who are taking their own lives.

Consider the 25 percent of enlistees and the 50 percent of reservists who have come back from the war with serious mental health issues. Despair seems an entirely appropriate response to the realization that the nightmares and flashbacks may never go away, that your ability to function in society and to manage relationships, work schedules or crowds will never be reliable. How not to despair if your prognosis is: Suck it up, soldier. This may never stop!

Neglect? The VA’s current backlog is 800,000 cases. Aside from the appalling conditions in many VA hospitals, in 2004, the last year for which statistics are available, almost 6 million veterans and their families were without any healthcare at all. Most of them are working people — too poor to afford private coverage, but not poor enough to qualify for Medicaid or means-tested VA care. Soldiers and veterans need help now, the help isn’t there, and the conversations about what needs to be done are only just now beginning.

Poverty? The symptoms of post-traumatic stress injuries or traumatic brain injuries often make getting and keeping a job an insurmountable challenge. The New York Times reported last week that though veterans make up only 11 percent of the adult population, they make up 26 percent of the homeless. If that doesn’t translate into despair, neglect and poverty, well, I’m not sure the distinction is one worth quibbling about.

There is a particularly terrible irony in the relationship between suicide bombers and the suicides of American soldiers and veterans. With the possible exception of some few sadists and psychopaths, Americans don’t enlist in the military because they want to kill civilians. And they don’t sign up with the expectation of killing themselves. How incredibly sad that so many end up dying of remorse for having performed acts that so disturb their sense of moral selfhood that they sentence themselves to death.

There is something so smugly superior in the way we talk about suicide bombers and the cultures that produce them. But here is an unsettling thought. In 2005, 6,256 American veterans took their own lives. That same year, there were about 130 documented deaths of suicide bombers in Iraq.* Do the math. That’s a ratio of 50-to-1. So who is it that is most effectively creating a culture of suicide and martyrdom? If George Bush is right, that it is despair, neglect and poverty that drive people to such acts, then isn’t it worth pointing out that we are doing a far better job?

*I say “about” because in the aftermath of a suicide bombing, it is often very difficult for observers to determine how many individual bodies have been blown to pieces.

FOX News Takes 32 Seconds to Explain We're in Iraq Forever

You Tube
Wednesday November 28, 2007

On 11-26-07 FOX substitute anchor Bret Baier devoted 32 seconds to the news that George Bush and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki have signed a "deal" that means 50,000 American troops will remain in Iraq for a long, long time.

Feds retreat on Amazon buyers' identities

Feds retreat on Amazon buyers' identities

Subpoena pulled after ruling that protects book customers' privacy
The Associated Press
updated 7:35 p.m. ET, Tues., Nov. 27, 2007

MADISON, Wisconsin - U.S. prosecutors have withdrawn a subpoena seeking the identities of thousands of people who bought used books through online retailer Amazon.com Inc., newly unsealed court records show.

The withdrawal came after a judge ruled the customers have a right to keep their reading habits from the government.

"The (subpoena's) chilling effect on expressive e-commerce would frost keyboards across America," U.S. Magistrate Judge Stephen Crocker wrote in a June ruling.

"Well-founded or not, rumors of an Orwellian federal criminal investigation into the reading habits of Amazon's customers could frighten countless potential customers into canceling planned online book purchases," the judge wrote in a ruling he unsealed last week.

Amazon said in court documents it hopes Crocker's decision will make it more difficult for prosecutors to obtain records involving book purchases. Assistant U.S. Attorney John Vaudreuil said Tuesday he doubted the ruling would hamper legitimate investigations.

‘The subpoena is troubling’
Crocker — who unsealed documents detailing the showdown, against prosecutors' wishes — said he believed prosecutors were seeking the information for a legitimate purpose. But he said First Amendment concerns about freedom of speech were justified and outweighed the subpoena's law enforcement purpose.

"The subpoena is troubling because it permits the government to peek into the reading habits of specific individuals without their knowledge or permission," Crocker wrote. "It is an unsettling and un-American scenario to envision federal agents nosing through the reading lists of law-abiding citizens while hunting for evidence against somebody else."

Federal prosecutors issued the subpoena last year as part of a grand jury investigation into a former Madison city official who was a prolific seller of used books on Amazon.com. They were looking for buyers who could be witnesses in the case.

The official, Robert D'Angelo, was indicted last month on fraud, money laundering and tax evasion charges. Prosecutors said he ran a used book business out of his city office and did not report the income. He has pleaded not guilty.

D'Angelo sold books through the Amazon Marketplace feature, and buyers paid Amazon, which took a commission.

"We didn't care about the content of what anybody read. We just wanted to know what these business transactions were," prosecutor Vaudreuil said. "These were simply business records we were seeking to prove the case of fraud and tax crimes against Mr. D'Angelo."

Prosecutors tried compromise
The initial subpoena sought records of 24,000 transactions dating to 1999. The company turned over many records but refused to identify the book buyers, citing their right to keep their reading choices private.

Prosecutors later narrowed the subpoena, asking the company to identify a sample of 120 customers.

Crocker brokered a compromise in which the company would send a letter to the 24,000 customers describing the investigation and asking them to voluntarily contact prosecutors if they were interested in testifying.

Prosecutors said they obtained the customer information they needed from a computer seized from D'Angelo earlier in the investigation.

Crocker scolded prosecutors in July for not looking for alternatives earlier. Vaudreuil said computer analysts initially failed to recover the information.

"If the government had been more diligent in looking for workarounds instead of baring its teeth when Amazon balked, it's probable that this entire First Amendment showdown could have been avoided," he wrote.

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21997757/