Monday, October 22, 2007

IMF warning on risks of inflation

Anti-IMF demonstrators in Washington DC
There have been demonstrations during the meetings
bbc news

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has warned central banks and finance ministers to stay focused on keeping inflation under control.

At its annual meeting, the IMF also stressed that countries have to work to deal with financial market turbulence.

The IMF's Policy Committee made progress on attempts to give emerging economies more voting power.

Former French Finance Minister Dominique Strauss-Khan takes over as IMF head at the end of the month.

His appointment resurrected arguments about whether Europe should always choose the head of the IMF while the US gets to nominate the head of the World Bank.

The new World Bank head, Robert Zoellick, is presiding over his first set of meetings since he took over from Paul Wolfowitz, who resigned in May.

The IMF's discussions reforms to voting systems are a reaction to the perception that developed nations have too much power over the IMF and World Bank.

Its policy committee is confident that at its meeting this time next year it will be able to finalise agreements to double the number of basic votes in which each member has equal voting power.

"I think that consensus includes certainly that there will be an increase in the voice of emerging economies and developing countries as a whole," said the outgoing IMF chief Rodrigo de Rato said at the summit.

Dollar: How Low Can It Go?

The Taipei Times
Oct 21, 2007

The weakened US dollar tumbled further on Friday on foreign exchange markets, sinking to another record low against the euro, as G7 finance chiefs met for talks in Washington.

The G7 finance ministers and central bank chiefs did not spell out a specific course of action. Rather, they sought to strike a confident tone that they are on top of the situation. Finance officials also said they will seek to learn the causes and lessons from the turmoil.

At 9pm GMT, the euro was swapping hands at US$1.4301, up from US$1.4297 late on Thursday. The euro had earlier surged to a record US$1.4319.

The dollar meanwhile fell sharply against the Japanese currency, dropping to ?114.53 from ?115.62 a day earlier.

The dollar has been undermined by mounting expectations that the US central bank will be again forced to cut borrowing costs.

The US Federal Reserve slashed its key interest rate last month by half a percentage point to 4.75 percent amid financial market turmoil and a lingering housing market downturn.

Lower borrowing costs in the US reduce interest in the dollar and boost the attractiveness of the euro.

US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has voiced confidence in a “strong dollar” in the past week, but the currency has declined sharply in the past year, falling by over 13 percent against the euro.

And many analysts expect the dollar’s fortunes to dwindle further in coming weeks, but that could trigger thorny problems for policy makers in other countries, particuarly the eurozone where exporters are becoming concerned about the euro’s strength.

Concerns are also mounting in the US that the dollar’s fall could spark inflation risks for the world’s largest economy as it makes foreign goods and products more expensive for Americans to buy.

The greenback’s value also dipped against the Canadian dollar, as the Canadian currency climbed as high as US$1.0381, marking its highest level against the US dollar in 33 years, before settling at US$1.0345.

Some analysts said a coordinated action by the G7 was unlikely because the strength of the euro reflected the good health of the eurozone economies.

In late New York trading, the dollar stood at 1.1660 Swiss francs, down from SF1.1693. The pound rose to US$2.0514 from US$2.0444.

Call to increase stop and search

BBC
Sunday October 21, 2007

More young people should be stopped and searched to help tackle knife and gun crime, a leading black police representative says.
Keith Jarrett, the outgoing president of the National Black Police Association (NBPA), said he would be pressing police for such an approach.

He said: "The black community is telling me we have to look at this."

Some senior black police officers have criticised the suggestion fearing it could lead to racial profiling.

Black people are six times more likely to be stopped than white people, according to Home Office figures.

This disparity has led to continued charges of police racism and critics say that increased use of stop and search tactics would inevitably affect the black community disproportionately.

'Victims and perpetrators'

Mr Jarrett will use a speech at the NBPA's annual conference this week to ask Police Minister Tony McNulty and Metropolitan Police chief Sir Ian Blair to consider searching more young people.

The suggestion contradicts the approach taken by the NBPA to date which has questioned the high proportion of black people stopped and searched by police.

Mr Jarrett told BBC News 24: "It's not that we should stop and search more black youths. It's not just black people that carry weapons, white people carry weapons as well.

Full article here.

2nd-Grader Suspended for Drawing of Gun

AP
Sunday October 21, 2007

A second-grader's drawing of a stick figure shooting a gun earned him a one-day school suspension.

Kyle Walker, 7, was suspended last week for violating Dennis Township Primary School's zero-tolerance policy on guns, the boy's mother, Shirley McDevitt, told The Press of Atlantic City.

Kyle gave the picture to another child on the school bus, and that child's parents complained about it to school officials, McDevitt said. Her son told her the drawing was of a water gun, she said.

A photocopy of the picture provided by McDevitt showed two stick figures with one pointing a crude-looking gun at the other, the newspaper said. What appeared to be the word "me" was written above the shooter, with another name scribbled above the other figure.

School officials declined to comment Friday. A message left at the superintendent's office Saturday was not returned.

Kyle drew other pictures, including a skateboarder, King Tut, a ghost, a tree and a Cyclops, the newspaper reported.

DynCorp Likely to Replace Blackwater in Iraq

WARREN P. STROBEL
Miami Herald
Oct. 20, 2007

Troubled military contractor Blackwater USA is likely to be eased out of its role of guarding U.S. diplomats in Iraq in the aftermath of a shooting last month that left 17 Iraqi civilians dead, U.S. officials said Friday.

While no decisions have been finalized, Blackwater’s role in Baghdad is likely to be taken over by one of two other contractors who provide security for the State Department in Iraq, the officials said. They are Triple Canopy and DynCorp International.

”There will be some sort of disengagement process, but it won’t be that they’re shown the door,” said a State Department official. “As one builds down, another builds up.”

He and other U.S. officials spoke on condition of anonymity because Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice had not received an oral report from a four-person team led by Patrick Kennedy, the department’s director of management policy.

The team reviewed State Department security operations in Iraq.

Blackwater has denied wrongdoing in the Sept. 16 shooting, the latest deadly incident involving its employees in Iraq, saying the guards were defending themselves. But reports by the U.S. military and the Iraqi government say the Blackwater guards fired without provocation.

Iraq’s government has demanded that Blackwater leave Iraq within six months.

A company spokeswoman, Anne Tyrrell, didn’t return a phone call seeking comment.

Blackwater’s current work order under a State Department contract worth $834 million reportedly runs out in May 2008.

But replacing the Moyock, N.C., company with another contractor raises several questions.

It’s unclear whether Blackwater employees in Iraq could simply switch employers. And, according to congressional officials, the State Department’s Diplomatic Security service argues that it cannot operate without the helicopters that Blackwater provides for escort and rescue efforts.

In a related development Friday, Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., who’s been investigating State Department operations in Iraq, said in a letter that Blackwater attempted to transport two Iraqi military aircraft out of Iraq without official permission.

In the letter to Blackwater founder Erik Prince, Waxman said an unnamed military official told his House Oversight Committee that “the Iraqi ministry of defense attempted to reclaim the aircraft, but that Blackwater would not comply.”

Waxman also alleged that Prince had misled the committee in testimony earlier this month.

Prince had said that the company’s early contracts with the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq and the State Department were competitively bid, when in fact they were sole-source contracts.

Israel Warns World War III May be Biblical War of Gog and Magog

Ezra HaLevi
Arutz Sheva
October 21, 2007

US President George W. Bush said a nuclear Iran would mean World War III. Israeli newscasts featured Gog & Magog maps of the likely alignment of nations in that potential conflict.

Channel 2 and Channel 10 TV showed the world map, sketching the basic alignment of the two opposing axes in a coming world war, in a manner evoking associations of the Gog and Magog prophecy for many viewers. The prophecy of Gog and Magog refers to a great world war centered on the Holy Land and Jerusalem and first appears in the book of Yechezkel (Ezekiel).

On one side were Israel, the United States, Britain, France and Germany. On the other were Iran, Russia, China, Syria and North Korea.

US President Bush said Wednesday during a press conference that Iran attaining nuclear weapons raises the risk of “World War III.”

“If Iran had a nuclear weapon, it’d be a dangerous threat to world peace,” Bush said. “So I told people that if you’re interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested [in preventing a nuclear Iran]…I take the threat of Iran with a nuclear weapon very seriously.”

Russian President Vladimir Putin visited Iran Tuesday and slammed the US’s refusal to rule out the use of force against Iran’s nuclear project. “Not only should we reject the use of force, but also the mention of force as a possibility,” he said.

Russia has blocked tougher UN sanctions in the UN Security Council, where it has veto power. The Russian president asserts that there is no evidence Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons rather than a peaceful nuclear power program.

Israel’s Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni called for a new Security Council resolution against Iran at a press conference following her meeting with US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice Wednesday. “I do believe there is a need for another Security Council resolution,” she told reporters. “In the past, the need to get everybody on board - including Russia and China - led to some compromises on the nature of the sanctions. I hope this will not be the case this time.”

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert announced Wednesday a sudden trip to Moscow Thursday morning, where he will meet with Putin about Iran. Other topics of discussion will reportedly be Russia’s continued supply of weapons to Syria, which have then made their way into the hands of various terrorist groups based there as well.

Kristol: Iran Is ‘The Only Real Threat’ To Success In Iraq

Think Progress
October 21, 2007

Today, on Fox News Sunday, Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol declared that the U.S. was close to victory in the Iraq war, arguing that the “only” concern left for the U.S is dealing with alleged Iranian involvement in Iraq:

We’re winning in Iraq. That is the absolute crucial precondition to having success in the broader fight against Islamic jihadism. … And I think we are going to have to be serious about dealing with both their intervention in Iraq — which is now the only real threat, I think, incidentally, to relative success in Iraq — and their nuclear program.

Watch it:

While Iran may be causing some violence in Iraq, there are more pressing “threats” to “success.” A National Intelligence Estimate released in February concluded that Iranian involvement was “not likely” to be a major driver of violence. An August McClatchy analysis found that the majority of suicide bombers in Iraq are from Saudi Arabia, not Iran.

In reality, “Iraq’s complex and overlapping sectarian, political and ethnic conflicts, as well as the difficult security situation continue to hinder progress in promoting economic development, the rule of law and political reconciliation,” according to Special Inspector General For Iraq Reconstruction Stuart Bowen.

Kristol used his allegations of Iranian involvement in Iraq to push for more war in the Middle East, claiming, “There has to be the credible threat of force” with Iran. He was quickly rebuked by Juan Williams:

Do you think there’s any question about this — whether or not we have credible military force? We are the superpower in the world. … The thing is we have our military stretched beyond all bounds, and you seem to want to engage in other wars. I don’t know why you feel this way.

Bill Kristol will readily lower his standards for the Iraq war in order to implement his hawkish, neoconservative agenda.

Transcript:

KRISTOL: We’re winning in Iraq. That is the absolute crucial precondition to having success in the broader fight against Islamic jihadism. So Senator Obama was wrong about that.

And he’s wrong about Iran. Senator Obama’s professed position –he’s given speeches on this — is that Iran should not be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. He’s not comfortable with an Iranian nuclear weapon.

And yet we’ve been pursuing diplomacy for four years, with our European friends — just two days ago, Ali Larijani, the Iranian negotiator who — when you go to the Europeans, they say, Well, Ahmadinejad is crazy, but he doesn’t matter. Khamenei, who knows? But Larijani — he’s a reasonable man. We can work with him. He resigned.

He was forced out. It looks like the Iranian government is going for the full hard line on their nuclear program. And I think we are going to have to be serious about dealing with both their intervention in Iraq — which is now the only real threat, I think, incidentally, to relative success in Iraq — and their nuclear program.

WALLACE: When you say getting serious, I think a lot of our viewers are going to say, Kristol thinks there’s going to be a war.

WILLIAMS: Yes.

KRISTOL: I think there could be a use of force. September 6th, 2007, when Israel used force against Syria to prevent them from developing nuclear weapons with North Korean aid, is going to go down in history, I think, as the date where we got a glimpse of the kind of future we’re dealing with.

If diplomacy works, that’s great. There has to be the credible threat of force both on the nuclear issue and, I think much more short-term, though — I agree with Brit on this. I think the short-term question is does Petraeus think he needs a little help across the border to secure our successes in Iraq.

And if so, I think the president will give it to him. We can’t let them just build IEDs and train Iraqis with impunity across the border.

WILLIAMS: Look. Do you think there’s any question about this –whether or not we have credible military force? We are the superpower in the world.

The thing is we have our military stretched beyond all bounds, and you seem to want to engage in other wars. I don’t know why you feel this way.

KRISTOL: I want to win the war. I want to support the military who are fighting over there who are being killed…

WILLIAMS: Oh, wait a second.

KRISTOL: … who are being killed by Iranian weapons.

WILLIAMS: Just a minute. You mean when it came to the surge, you wanted to defend the surge. Why don’t we defend the fact that for five years we’ve been involved in a war that’s cost us life and limb, and we have — we’re totally out of control?

Miami Real Estate Crash: Properties Sell for Half Price at Auction

Cryptogon
October 21st, 2007

Chertoff Warns IEDs a Rising Threat in U.S.

Spencer S. Hsu and Mary Beth Sheridan
Washington Post
October 20, 2007

The Department of Homeland Security and the FBI agree that the homemade explosive devices that have wreaked havoc in Iraq pose a rising threat to the United States. But lawmakers and first responders say the Bush administration has been slow to devise a strategy for countering the weapons and has not provided adequate money and training for a concerted national effort.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, who told the Senate last month that such bombs are terrorists’ “weapon of choice,” said yesterday at a local meeting that President Bush will soon issue a blueprint for countering the threat of improvised explosive devices, or IEDs. Chertoff’s department said in a draft report on IEDs earlier this year that national efforts “lack strategic guidance, are sometimes insufficiently coordinated . . . and lack essential resources.”

Among the shortcomings identified in the report: Explosives-sniffing dogs are trained differently by various federal agencies, making collaboration between squads “difficult if not impossible.” Federal agencies maintain separate databases on bomb incidents. Separately, bomb squad commanders have complained of inadequate training for responding to truck bombs.

Local officials say preparedness efforts around the country remain a patchwork. For instance, the Los Angeles Police Department’s bomb squad, which responds to about 1,000 calls a year, has 28 full-time explosives technicians and is about to move into a new, $8 million downtown headquarters. The squad has an explosives library, a research facility for testing and access to an explosives range for training.

In contrast, the D.C. police bomb squad’s 10 technicians handle about 700 calls a year, but they are housed in portable trailers and must also perform crime patrols. Among the six U.S. metropolitan regions considered top terrorist targets, only the Washington area has not earned the top rating of the DHS three-level scoring system for bomb squads. Regional officials recently decided to spend $7 million in federal grants to buy equipment to lift that rating.

Experts and officials have struggled in reaching a consensus that the government should invest more in efforts to detect and disrupt bomb plots in advance, and not just pay for equipment and training that could keep specific devices from exploding in metropolitan regions or reaching other targets.

Senior Democratic senators have criticized the administration for not completing its national strategy. Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General William E. Moschella said of the forthcoming strategy, “It’s late and we wish we were two months earlier, but the bottom line is we have submitted . . . a product [to the White House] that we’re very proud of.”

Although the document has been under preparation since February, Chertoff said, “we haven’t waited for the paperwork . . . because my concern, frankly, is not words; it’s deeds and actions.” He said his department has provided $1.7 billion in grants related to the IED threat, trained workers at 16 ports and deployed thousands of new explosives detectors at airports, and plans to increase the screening of small boats and private aircraft that might carry bombers or bombs.

While roadside bombs and armor-piercing charges have become the signature weapons of the Iraqi insurgency, U.S. officials define the domestic IED threat across a wide spectrum, including a block of TNT with a remote-controlled detonator; a fertilizer bomb delivered by a car, truck or plane; and a suicide runner carrying a peroxide-based explosive. At the extreme, an IED can be enhanced into a “dirty bomb,” rigged to scatter radioactive material.

“Terrorists’ use of IEDs cannot be extrapolated into anything other than a major threat to this country,” Supervisory Special Agent Barbara Martinez, a senior official at the FBI’s Critical Incident Response Group, said yesterday at a discussion organized by the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

“National coordination of IED prevention efforts is absolutely crucial,” said Lt. Shawn E. Stallworth, a Michigan State Police detective and member of the National Bomb Squad Commanders Advisory Board. The group this year called for “urgent action” to increase training in handling the threat posed by large-vehicle bombs.

Congress last fall called for DHS to produce a national strategy, but the department never released it. Instead, the White House stepped in on Feb. 12, issuing a presidential directive reassigning the lead role for the project to the Justice Department and setting a new, July deadline. That date passed, too, a casualty of fierce disputes among the FBI, the DHS Office for Bombing Protection and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives over the role that the ATF should continue to play in training, the collection of statistics and technical analysis.

“U.S. leaders have been concerned about IEDs for a number of years, but despite the known threat and fear of IEDs reaching America, the government has fallen way behind,” said David Heyman, director of the Center for Strategic and International Studies’ homeland security program. “If terrorists initiated an IED campaign in America today, it could paralyze us.”

Addressing Heyman’s group, Chertoff said the lesson from Iraq is to gather intelligence to disrupt the long chain of events needed to deliver a bomb — from recruiting terrorists to infiltrating them into the country, gathering bomb materials, and selecting targets and tactics. “The better we hone our intelligence, the better we are in having a focused, less disruptive and less costly intervention to prevent an IED from detonating,” he said.

Chertoff cited the example of Raed al-Banna, 32, a Jordanian identified through his fingerprints as the perpetrator of a February 2005 suicide car-bombing in Iraq. In 2003, he was flagged as a potential terrorist by customs inspectors at O’Hare International Airport in Chicago and ordered to leave the country.

U.S. authorities have long tracked the IED threat, since the first World Trade Center attack in 1993 and the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. But officials worry that Iraq — where the explosives have killed or wounded more than 21,200 Americans — has become a laboratory for bomb design, technologies and tactics that can be spread over the Internet.

From the transit system bombings in Madrid and London in 2004 and 2005, to a disrupted Britain-based plot to smuggle liquid explosives onto transatlantic airliners in 2006, al-Qaeda-inspired cells may be importing that group’s signature tactic of coordinated and spectacular attacks but using quickly assembled conventional weapons against softer targets, analysts said.

“As we saw in London and Glasgow, Scotland, in June, this trend has already begun,” FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III said in August, citing the failed car-bomb attacks against a nightclub and an airport.

Critics have noted that although the Pentagon’s main IED-fighting agency is spending $15 billion over five years to defeat the threat in Iraq, the DHS Office for Bombing Prevention is to receive less than $50 million over the same period.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who has proposed adding $25 million per year to its budget, said the office currently cannot afford to finish comparing the capabilities of all local and state bomb squads, or to connect enough first responders to an online network called Tripwire that contains information on terrorist IEDs.

In a recent letter to Chertoff, Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Robert C. Byrd (D-W.Va.) and Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.) criticized the administration for its slow pace and for threatening to veto IED-related funding in a pending budget bill. Byrd told Chertoff in another letter this week: “Having a Strategy is not worth the paper it is printed on unless it is backed up with resources and a commitment to working at all levels of government to address the threat.”

Iran warns it can fire 11,000 rockets in one minute if attacked

Muslim World News
October 20, 2007

TEHRAN, October 20 (RIA Novosti) - Iran has the capability to fire 11,000 rockets at enemy bases within one minute if the country is attacked, a top commander in the Revolutionary Guards Corps said on Saturday.

“Within the first minute of any attack by enemies against our country, the missile and artillery unit of the ground force is capable of firing 11,000 missiles and shells at targets that are known to us,” Gen. Mahmoud Chaharbaghi, the top missile commander of the Revolutionary Guards, said on national TV.

Iran has precise data on the deployment of potential attackers’ military bases in the region, he said.

“A possible war will not last long, because within days we will reduce our enemies to ashes. The enemy must ask himself what losses he is prepared to suffer for his stupidity,” the commander said.

The commander’s comments come four days after United States President George W. Bush’s warning that if Iran’s nuclear program is not stopped, World War III could break out. The United States has military bases in several countries near Iran, including thousands of troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, which share borders with the Islamic Republic.

In response to Bush’s comments, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad Ali Hosseini said on Thursday: “Statements of this kind reflect America’s expansionist goals, which will surely weaken international security and ignite the U.S. government’s militarist policy.”

Washington, which along with many other Western nations accuses Iran of pursing a secret nuclear weapons program, despite Iranian denials, has refused to rule out military action against the country in the long-running international dispute.

Bush’s comments at a White House news conference came a day after President Vladimir Putin’s visit to Tehran, where the Russian leader said he saw no evidence that Iran was developing nuclear weapons.

Putin’s trip to Iran for a summit of Caspian littoral states, the first visit by a Russian or Soviet leader since Joseph Stalin traveled to Iran in 1943, provoked concerns in the West over increasingly close ties between Moscow and Tehran. The summit resulted in a five-way agreement that no Caspian nations would allow the use of their territories for a military strike against any of them.

Living Paycheck to Paycheck Gets Harder

ANNE D’INNOCENZIO
Associated Press
October 19, 2007

NEW YORK (AP) - The calculus of living paycheck to paycheck in America is getting harder. What used to last four days might last half that long now. Pay the gas bill, but skip breakfast. Eat less for lunch so the kids can have a healthy dinner.

Across the nation, Americans are increasingly unable to stretch their dollars to the next payday as they juggle higher rent, food and energy bills. It’s starting to affect middle-income working families as well as the poor, and has reached the point of affecting day-to-day calculations of merchants like Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT) (WMT), 7-Eleven Inc. and Family Dollar Stores Inc. (FDO) (FDO)

Food pantries, which distribute foodstuffs to the needy, are reporting severe shortages and reduced government funding at the very time that they are seeing a surge of new people seeking their help.

While economists debate whether the country is headed for a recession, some say the financial stress is already the worst since the last downturn at the start of this decade.

From Family Dollar to Wal-Mart, merchants have adjusted their product mix and pricing accordingly. Sales data show a marked and more prolonged drop in spending in the days before shoppers get their paychecks, when they buy only the barest essentials before splurging around payday.

“It’s pretty pronounced,” said Kiley Rawlins, a spokeswoman at Family Dollar. “It seems like to us, customers are running out of food products, paper towels sooner in the month.”

Wal-Mart, the world’s largest retailer, said the imbalance in spending before and after payday in July was the biggest it has ever seen, though the drop-off wasn’t as steep in August.

And 7-Eleven says its grocery sales have jumped 12-13 percent over the past year, compared with only slight increases for non-necessities like gloves and toys. Shoppers can’t afford to load up at the supermarket and are going to the most convenient places to buy emergency food items like milk and eggs.

“It even costs more to get the basics like soap and laundry detergent,” said Michelle Grassia, who lives with her husband and three teenage children in the Bedford-Stuyvesant section of Brooklyn, N.Y.

Her husband’s check from his job at a grocery store used to last four days. “Now, it lasts only two,” she said.

To make up the difference, Grassia buys one gallon of milk a week instead of three. She sometimes skips breakfast and lunch to make sure there’s enough food for her children. She cooks with a hot plate because gas is too expensive. And she depends more than ever on the bags of free vegetables and powdered milk from a local food pantry.

Grassia’s story is neither new nor unique. With the fastest-rising food and energy prices since the 1980s, low-income consumers are stretching their budgets by eating cheap foods like peanut butter and pasta.

Industry analysts and some economists fear the strain will get worse as people are hit with higher home heating bills this winter and mortgage rates go up.

It’s bad enough already for 85-year-old Dominica Hoffman.

She gets $1,400 a month in pension and Social Security from her days in the garment industry. After paying $500 in rent on an apartment in Pennsauken, N.J., and shelling out money for food, gas and other expenses, she’s broke by the end of the month. She’s had to cut fruits and vegetables from her grocery order - and that’s even with financial help from her children.

“Everything is up,” she said.

Many consumers, particularly those making less than $30,000 a year, are cutting spending on nutritious food like milk and vegetables, and analysts fear they’re further skimping on basic medical care and other critical services.

Coupon-clipping just isn’t enough.

“The reality of hunger is right here,” said the Rev. Melony Samuels, director of The BedStuy Campaign against Hunger, a church-affiliated food pantry in Brooklyn.

The pantry scrambled to feed 5,000 new families over the past 12 months, up almost 70 percent from 3,000 the year before.

“I am shocked to see such numbers,” Samuels said, “and I am really concerned that this is just the beginning of what we are going to see.”

In the past three months, Samuels has seen more clients in higher-paying jobs - the $35,000 range - line up for food.

The Regional Food Bank of Northeastern New York, which covers 23 counties in New York State, cited a 30 percent rise in visitors in the first nine months of this year, compared with 2006.

Maureen Schnellmann, senior director of food and nutrition programs at the American Red Cross Food Pantry in Boston, reported a 30 percent increase from January through August over last year.

Until a few months ago, Dellria Seales, a home care assistant, was just getting by living with her daughter, a hairdresser, and two grandchildren in a one-bedroom apartment for $750 a month. But a knee injury in January forced her to quit her job, leaving her at the mercy of Samuels’ pantry because most of her daughter’s $1,200 a month income goes to rent, energy and food costs.

“I need it. Without it, we wouldn’t survive,” Seales said as she picked up carrots and bananas.

John Vogel, a professor at Dartmouth College’s Tuck School of Business, worries that the squeeze will lead to a less nutritious diet and inadequate medical or child care.

In the meantime, rising costs show no signs of abating.

Gas prices hit a record nationwide average of $3.23 per gallon in late May before receding a little, though prices are expected to soar again later this year. Food costs have increased 4.5 percent over the past 12 months, partly because of higher fuel costs. Egg prices were 44 percent higher, while milk was up 21.3 percent over the past 12 months to nearly $4 a gallon, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The average family of four is spending anywhere from $7 to $10 extra a week - $40 more a month - on groceries alone, compared to a year ago, according to retail consultant Burt Flickinger III.

And while overall wage growth is a solid 4.1 percent over the past 12 months, economists say the increases are mostly for the top earners.

Retailers started noticing the strain in late spring and early summer as they were monitoring the spending around the paycheck cycle.

Wal-Mart and Family Dollar key on the first week of the month, when government checks like Social Security and public assistance generally hit consumers’ mailboxes.

7-Eleven, whose customers are more diverse, looks at paycheck cycles in specific markets dominated by a major employer, such as General Motors in Detroit, to discern trends in shopping.

To economize, shoppers are going for less expensive food.

“They’re buying more peanut butter and pasta. And they’re going for hamburger meat,” Flickinger, the retail consultant, said. “They’re trying to outsmart the store by looking for deep discounts at the end of the month.”

He said the last time he saw this was 2000-2001, when the dot-com bubble burst and the economy went into a recession after massive layoffs.

For now, low-price retailers are readjusting their merchandising and pricing.

Wal-Mart is becoming more aggressive on discounting. It announced Thursday it is expanding price cuts to 15,000 items, ranging from Motts apple juice and Progresso soups to women’s fleece tops, heading into the holidays.

Family Dollar, whose food offerings were limited to candy and snacks until two years ago, has expanded its mix of groceries like fruit cups, cereal and such refrigerated items as milk and ice cream while cutting back on shoes. This summer the chain began accepting food stamps.

Food pantries are also getting creative. Samuels said her church, Full Gospel Tabernacle of Faith, just started offering free cooking classes to teach clients who are diabetic or have other health conditions how to prepare vegetables like squash. It’s also offering free exercise classes.

“We are trying to make them health conscious,” Samuels said. “It’s not right to give them just anything. Our mantra is eat well and live well.”

Bush Declares Constitution Null and Void Again

Lee Rogers
Intel Strike Blog Network
19 October, 2007

George W. Bush has declared the Constitution null and void yet again. This time, Bush has used the crisis in Burma as an excuse to issue an executive order that further undermines the Constitutional rights of the American people. Thus far Bush has declared himself a dictator in the case of a national emergency, has stomped on the Constitution by abolishing the fourth amendment through a vaguely worded executive order that claims the government has the power to block the property of people without due process who might be undermining democracy in Lebanon and by abolishing the fifth amendment through another vaguely worded executive order that claims the government has the power to block the property of individuals who undermine Iraq reconstruction including Iraq war protesters.

Bush’s new executive order claims the government has the power to block the property of people who might be directly or indirectly supporting the Burmese government. The executive order was issued today and can be accessed here. The language in this new executive order is very similar to the previous aforementioned executive orders and expands the scope of people who the government can seize property from without any sort of probable cause, warrant or due process.

In the first section of this new executive order Bush expands the scope of the national emergency declared back in 1997 as the excuse for its issuance. He also uses vague language to determine the criteria for seizing an individual’s property. According to the language in the executive order, an individual who the government determines provides even accidental indirect support without any sort of due process can have their property seized. The first section of the executive order is shown below.

I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, hereby expand the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13047 of May 20, 1997, and relied upon for additional steps taken in Executive Order 13310 of July 28, 2003, finding that the Government of Burma’s continued repression of the democratic opposition in Burma, manifested most recently in the violent response to peaceful demonstrations, the commission of human rights abuses related to political repression, and engagement in public corruption, including by diverting or misusing Burmese public assets or by misusing public authority, constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, and I hereby order:

Section 1. Except to the extent provided in section 203(b)(1), (3), and (4) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(1), (3), and (4)), the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 (title IX, Public Law 106–387), or regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the effective date of this order, all property and interests in property of the following persons that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of United States persons, including their overseas branches, are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:

(a) the persons listed in the Annex attached and made a part of this order; and

(b) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, after consultation with the Secretary of State:

(i) to be a senior official of the Government of Burma,

the State Peace and Development Council of Burma, the Union Solidarity and Development Association of Burma, or any successor entity to any of the foregoing;

(ii) to be responsible for, or to have participated in, human rights abuses related to political repression in Burma;

(iii) to be engaged, or to have engaged, in activities facilitating public corruption by senior officials of the Government of Burma;

(iv) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, logistical, or technical support for, or goods or services in support of, the Government of Burma, the State Peace and Development Council of Burma, the Union Solidarity and Development Association of Burma, any successor entity to any of the foregoing, any senior official of any of the foregoing, or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to Executive Order 13310 or section 1(b)(i)-(v) of this order;

(v) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to Executive Order 13310 or section 1(b)(i)-(v) of this order; or

(vi) to be a spouse or dependent child of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order or Executive Order 13310.

In section 5 of the executive order Bush states that the Constitution is null and void as it pertains to this executive order. This section states that because of the ability to transfer funds or assets instantaneously that the government does not need a warrant or provide an individual with due process in order to seize an individual’s property because it would make the purposes of the executive order ineffectual. This is similar language that Bush has used in his previous unconstitutional executive orders. Section 5 of the executive order is shown below.

Sec. 5. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to section 1 of this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render these measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13047, and relied upon for additional steps taken in Executive Order 13310, and expanded in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to this order.

Bush does not have the authority to say that he can seize the property of people without a warrant or without due process simply because there is technology to transfer funds instantaneously. Like Bush’s previous executive orders this new one pertaining to Burma is a clear violation of both the fourth and fifth amendments and shows yet again that he is hell bent on tearing the Constitution into a million pieces. Due process, appropriate search warrants and other protected rights referenced by the Constitution are not mentioned anywhere in this new executive order.

George W. Bush is a traitor to this country and he needs to be held accountable for his actions. How can a President get a way with issuing three similar executive orders which between them all declare the fourth and fifth amendments and for that matter the Constitution null and void in a so called free country? The answer is simple, the United States is not a free country and anybody saying so is a liar.

Cheney: Iran faces ’serious consequences’ over nuclear drive

AFP
October 21, 2007

Vice President Dick Cheney Sunday said the United States and its allies would not permit Iran to get nuclear weapons and warned of “serious consequences” if it continues to enrich uranium.

“The Iranian regime needs to know that if it stays on its present course, the international community is prepared to impose serious consequences,” he said in a speech to the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

The United States and its allies “will not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon,” he said.

Implementing Domestic Intelligence Surveillance

Secrecy News
October 15, 2007

Upon lawful request and for a thousand dollars, Comcast, one of the nation’s leading telecommunications companies, will intercept its customers’ communications under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

The cost for performing any FISA surveillance “requiring deployment of an intercept device” is $1,000.00 for the “initial start-up fee (including the first month of intercept service),” according to a newly disclosed Comcast Handbook for Law Enforcement (pdf).

Thereafter, the surveillance fee goes down to “$750.00 per month for each subsequent month in which the original [FISA] order or any extensions of the original order are active.”

With respect to surveillance policy, the Comcast manual hews closely to the letter of the law, as one would hope and expect.

“If your [FISA intercept] request pertains to individuals outside the U.S., please be sure you have complied with all the requirements in 50 U.S.C. sections 105A and/or 105B,” the manual says, referring to provisions of the Protect America Act that was enacted last month. “Requests such as these can not be honored after one year and must be dated prior to February 5, 2008, unless extended by Congress.”

Comcast will also comply with disclosure demands presented in the form of National Security Letters. However, the manual says, “Attention must be paid to the various court proceedings in which the legal status of such requests is at issue.”

In short, “Comcast will assist law enforcement agencies in their investigations while protecting subscriber privacy as required by law and applicable privacy policies.”

At the same time, “Comcast reserves the right to respond or object to, or seek clarification of, any legal requests and treat legal requests for subscriber information in any manner consistent with applicable law.”

A copy of the manual was obtained by Secrecy News. See “Comcast Cable Law Enforcement Handbook,” September 2007.

The role of telecommunications companies in intelligence surveillance is under increased scrutiny as the Bush Administration seeks to shield the companies from any liability associated with their cooperation in what may be illegal warrantless surveillance.

Also, there are new indications that the unauthorized warrantless surveillance program pre-dated 9/11. The Rocky Mountain News, the Washington Post, and others reported allegations that the government may have penalized Qwest Communications for refusing to participate in a pre-9/11 National Security Agency surveillance program that the company believed might be illegal.

The Washington Post editorialized yesterday that the telecommunications companies should indeed be immunized against liability, as the Bush Administration desires. Even though it is not known exactly what the companies did, the Post said, they “seem to us to have been acting as patriotic corporate citizens in a difficult and uncharted environment.”

Writing in Salon.com, Glenn Greenwald disputed that view, arguing that patriotism lies in compliance with the law, not in mere obedience to executive authority.

Illegals OK’d to drive in New York

Karyn Chenoweth
Monsters and Critics
October 21, 2007

New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer has ignited a political fight over immigration by ordering state officials to issue driver’s licenses to illegal aliens, prompting at least one county legislature to defy the executive order and pushing toward a showdown in court.

The Washington Times reporter Joseph Curl writes that “after spending months trying to deflect charges that he used state police to target the Republican leader of the state Senate, Mr. Spitzer appears eager for a fight over this contentious issue.”

“The rabid right that wants to pile on and use this to demagogue the issue will not carry the day in New York state,” he said recently. “Those who view this as a political issue once again are taking the state in the wrong direction.”

The driver’s license issue has thrusted the embattled governor, deeply at odds with New Yorker voters, into the national spotlight.

When New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, who abandoned the Republican Party, criticized the order recently, the Democratic governor shot back that the mayor was “dead wrong, factually wrong, legally wrong, morally wrong, ethically wrong.”

Former New York City Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani joined the list of opponents this week. “Governor Spitzer should not give licenses to illegals,” he told the Republican Jewish Coalition on Tuesday. “It doesn’t make sense.”

Lou Dobbs highlighted the issue on CNN during one segment after the Monroe County legislature defied the governor and ordered its county clerk to require anyone seeking a driver’s license to provide a valid Social Security number. The decision runs counter to Mr. Spitzer’s order, in which illegal aliens with valid foreign passports would be eligible to obtain a state driver’s license.

Spitzer was defiant: “I hate to say it — the clerks have to enforce it,” he said. “The clerks who issue driver’s licenses are agents of the state. They do not make state law on this. State government does.”

In another move, 29 clerks, all but one a Republican, voted to oppose the plan, with 13 vowing to directly disobey the governor, even if ordered to comply. The clerks said their offices would be hard-pressed to determine the legality of applicants.

The issue has prompted high-powered dissent, including on Capitol Hill. Rep. Thomas M. Reynolds, New York Republican, has denounced the order as “bad policy exacerbating our broken immigration system.”

“Those who have come to the United States illegally should not be rewarded with a New York state driver’s license,” he said.

John F. Lehman, a former Navy secretary who served on the September 11 commission, called the governor’s decree “absurd.”

“It’s a perfect formula for al Qaeda. They won’t be able to resist it. They will be able to come to New York,” he said. “It’s going to become a magnet to lawbreakers because the surrounding states will adhere to the federal standards.”

Critics say the credibility of a New York driver’s license could be called into question in other states, because applicants would not be required to prove that they have a Social Security number.

Republican Gov. George E. Pataki decreed that immigrants would need to prove they were in the United States legally before getting licenses. During the gubernatorial campaign, Spitzer vowed to change that. With the Republican-led Senate adamantly opposed to any change, the governor bypassed the Legislature by issuing an executive order according to Curl of the Washington Times.

The plan is supposed to go into effect in December, but the Senate’s Republican majority has pledged to override Spitzer’s order in an emergency session Oct. 22.

The public is opposed to Spitzer’s plan as well, a recent poll shows.

A Reuters/ Zogby survey of 718 likely voters in New York found that 65 percent of the state’s voters are against the proposal. The poll, taken Oct. 11-15, showed that nearly half — 47 percent — of Democrats oppose the plan, compared with 92 percent of Republicans.

Iran’s Ambassador to UN says US nuclear arsenal worries world

Islamic Republic News Agency
October 21, 2007

Iran’s Permanent Representative to UN Mohammad Khazaie said here Wednesday Iran, the only victim of chemical weapons in contemporary era is highly motivated for efforts aimed at a world without WMD, adding, thousands of nuclear warheads at US arsenal worry world nations.

Khazaie made the comment at a meeting of the UN General Assembly’s 1st Committee, allocated to surveying disarmament and international security.

The IRI Ambassador expounded on Iran’s basic policies in that respect, Iran’s stands regarding usage of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, and the assault of Saddam’s armed forces against Iran and brutal vast usage of chemical weapons during the eight years of imposed war.

Khazaie added, “Nearly two decades after the end of the Iraqi imposed war, still thousands of Iranians are suffering from the effects of the chemical weapons, whose raw materials were provided by some permanent members of the UN Security Council.”

Referring to the existence of thousands of chemical weapons at the arsenal of the US Army, he said, “Today, the world is worried about those fatal weapons more than ever.”

The Iranian envoy pointed out the contradictions in declared US policies regarding global disarmament, while Washington simultaneously threatens other nations of atomic bombardments.

He added, “Although the United States claims to be the standard bearer of the international campaign against weapons of mass destruction (WMD), Washington takes full advantage of the stockpiled nukes at its arsenals as an effective tool at the service of materializing its security and foreign policy objectives.

Khazaie said, “The United States is today threatening the non-nuclear countries that are members of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) of US nuclear attacks.

Iran’s Ambassador at UN also denounced the revived US missile shield defense, which he said is the reminder of the Cold War era, questioned Washington’s intentions in bringing up the issue again, adding, “By allocating fifty billion dollars to that suspicious project, the US is after establishment of absolute security for itself.”

He said, “Yet, such a project has long term negative aftermaths for entire world nations, and materializing such an objective is basically impossible in our closely inter-related world today.” Elsewhere in his address, Khazaie criticized the Zionist regime’s persistent refusal from signing the nuclear NPT, while pursuing its military nuclear programs secretly, arguing, “Israel is the only obstacle in the way of declaring the Middle East a nuclear weapons free zone.”

He added, “The international community, and particularly the regional countries, must act unanimously to counter the threat posed by he nuclear weapons of that expansionist, usurper regime.” Khazaie in his address also referred to the work plan agreed upon by Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) aimed at solving the entire remaining ambiguities, calling the initiative a long stride taken by Iran, that has led to creation of a positive atmosphere for returning Iran’s nuclear dossier to the agency.” Iran’s permanent representative at UN reiterated, “The IAEA’s technical framework and holding negotiations are the only appropriate ways for solving Iran’s nuclear problems appropriately.”

He emphasized, “The Iranian nation and Government are resolutely determined to materialize their absolute right to take advantage of nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.”

Khazaie further stressed, “We are also determined to conquer the peaks of nuclear sciences, while Iran respects its entire international commitments, including those stated in the NPT, and asking for nothing beyond his rights.”

U.S. air strikes in Baghdad kill toddlers

Reuters
October 21, 2007

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - U.S. air strikes in a Shi’ite stronghold of Baghdad on Sunday killed at least two toddlers, Reuters television footage showed.

Police said a total of 13 people were killed in the strikes and more than 50 were wounded.

In the morgue of Imam Ali hospital in the district of Sadr city the bodies of two toddlers, one wearing a nappy, lay on blankets while doctors tended to wounded men and boys, the video footage showed.

In the house where one of the toddlers lived, a man who said he was a cousin, pointed to bloodstained mattresses and blood-splattered pillows, choking back tears as he held up a photo showing one of the dead children.

“We were waking in the morning and all of a sudden rockets landed in the house and the children were screaming,” said a woman outside the house.

The U.S. military confirmed it had conducted early morning operations in Sadr city “targeting criminals believed to be responsible for the kidnapping of coalition soldiers in November 2006 and May 2007″.

Friday, October 19, 2007

Dollar dives to historic euro low ahead of G7 meet

LONDON (AFP) — The ailing US dollar hit another record low versus the euro on Friday as the market fretted over gloomy US economic prospects and G7 finance ministers gathered in Washington, dealers said.

In early European trade, the euro jumped to a record 1.4319 dollars, the highest level since the single currency's creation in 1999.

That was an increase of 14 percent over the past year and 22 percent up on its initial rate of 1.1665 dollars set on December 31, 1998.

In late European deals, it stood at 1.4250 dollars, down from 1.4297 late on Thursday.

The dollar slid to to 114.96 yen, from 115.62 late on Thursday.

The dollar's dwindling value has been thrown into the limelight ahead of the gathering of Group of Seven (G7) finance ministers and central bank chiefs in Washington on Friday which was due to start at 1715 GMT.

US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson continues to voice confidence in a "strong dollar" but the currency has declined sharply in the past year.

Nervousness about the health of the global economy and the meeting also pushed up the yen, which is often sold by speculators to fund risky "carry trade" investments in high-yielding assets.

Dealers said players were betting that G7 chiefs would refrain from taking any action to try to bolster the sagging dollar despite growing concern in Europe about the strong euro's effect on eurozone exporters.

"There is already some speculation that officials will attempt to prop up the dollar at the G7 finance ministers' meeting," said Julian Jessop of Capital Economics.

"But we expect this meeting to be a non-event for the markets."

In recent years, G7 officials have refrained from any direct signal to impact currencies.

While French and Italian politicians have voiced concerns about the euro's rise, Germany and other eurozone countries appear more relaxed about it.

On the sidelines of a European Union summit meeting in Portugal French President Nicolas Sarkozy said he saw a consensus among EU leaders that some currencies were too weak ahead of the Washington G7 meeting.

"Not everybody considers that the euro is too high but everybody considers that other currencies are too weak," Sarkozy told reporters.

The French president did not specify which currencies he had in mind. Analysts said, however, coordinated action by the G7 was unlikely because the strength of the euro reflected the good health of the eurozone economies.

"The strong euro reflects robust growth in the eurozone, while concerns over the outlook for the US economy grew" after higher than expected weekly jobless claims, said Hiroshi Sakurai, analyst at Mizuho Investors Securities.

The market was also keeping an eye on oil prices, which hit a record high 90.07 dollars per barrel in New York on concerns about tensions between Turkey and Iraq, dealers said.

In recent weeks, the dollar has been undermined by the increased prospect of another US interest rate cut later this month, after the Federal Reserve slashed its key rate last month by a half-point to 4.75 percent.

Lower borrowing costs in the United States reduce interest in the dollar and boost the attractiveness of the euro.

In late European trade Friday, the euro changed hands at 1.4250 dollars, against 1.4297 dollars late Thursday, 163.82 yen (165.32), 0.6963 pounds (0.6992) and 1.6709 Swiss francs (1.6721).

The dollar stood at 114.96 yen (115.62) and 1.1726 Swiss francs (1.1693).

The pound was at 2.0470 dollars (2.0444).

In London, the price of gold slipped to 763.00 dollars per ounce at the evening fixing from 764.15 dollars late Thursday.

Bernanke speaks; market crashes

salon

"In a world of uncertainty," Ben Bernanke said in a speech Friday morning, "informing the public about the central bank's objectives, plans and outlook can affect behavior and macroeconomic outcomes."

Case in point? He also said, "Indeed, intuition suggests that stronger action by the central bank may be warranted to prevent particularly costly outcomes." Following which, the stock market went into freefall. The Dow Jones industrial average dropped 366 points, with the other major indexes in similar disarray.

Let's be fair. Investors have a lot more to worry about right now than the shape of Bernanke's nuance. The woeful quarterly earnings numbers reported by four big banks -- Citigroup, Bank of America, Washington Mutual and Wachovia -- are distressing. The news that two "structured investment funds" are having trouble paying back their debts is also nerve-racking. The continued terrible performance of the housing sector, along with oil prices that briefly broke through $90 a barrel on Friday, has the word "recession" front and foremost. The much ballyhooed plan to pull Wall Street's coals out of the fire by creating a "super-conduit," aka "The Entity," may have backfired, by signaling to financial markets that the credit crunch is much worse than people had begun to hope.

As the central banker in charge, Bernanke certainly has the power to move markets with no more than an infelicitous phrase, but we can't give him all the blame for this one.

Nevertheless, what he said was very interesting and deserves close attention. The speech was ostensibly an appraisal of the contributions to economic theory made by Bill Poole, the soon-to-be-retiring president of the St. Louis branch of the Federal Reserve. Poole's academic work focused on the challenge of conducting appropriate monetary policy in the absence of certainty about the true state of the economy.

To simplify vastly, one school of thought argues that, absent total certainty about what is really going on, the Fed should move slowly, carefully and gradually, surprising no one, and thus minimizing potential shocks or disruption to the economy. Another school of thought says that such actions won't make any real difference, because the public will factor into their expectations of what's going to happen any such gradualist moves, and thus negate their impact. Therefore, the only actions the Fed can take that would make a real difference would be surprising ones.

All very interesting, and seemingly theoretical; every speech by Bernanke has the feel of a brilliant lecturer at an Ivy League school stretching his muscles just for the intellectual fun of it.

But then he concluded by saying that a) the Fed should be ready to take "stronger action" to "prevent particularly costly outcomes" and b) that it is very important to keep the public informed about the central bank's plans.

So was he saying to the world: Get ready -- at any moment I might do something shocking? That's almost what it sounds like. And although one might think that Wall Street would be heartened by this warning -- yippee, another big fat rate cut could be coming! -- the flip side is that if Bernanke is preparing the way for strong action, that means strong action could be necessary in the near future. Which, in turn, could explain why the bloom is suddenly off Wall Street's rose, again.

On the 20th anniversary of Black Monday, no less, to the very day. How spooky is that?

UPDATE 1-Fed's Poole: too much transparency clouds message

ST. LOUIS, Oct 19 (Reuters) - St. Louis Federal Reserve President William Poole on Friday said that it was possible to be too transparent when trying to communicate with the public.

"Transparency can really interfere with sending the message," Poole told a conference hosted by the St Louis Fed.

"Everything that we do and say is going to be read by the market as having something to do with (our) price-setter responsibility (as) the central bank," he said.

"You have to explain what the message is, why you are doing it, what do you want people to conclude from it. You just don't just throw a whole (out a) bunch of raw data," he said. "That does not create genuine communication."

Poole, a voting member of the Fed's interest rate-setting committee this year, was speaking at a monetary policy conference in his honor before his retirement in March.

"You might ask if it would be more useful to release (the Fed's forecast) on a quarterly basis, or a monthly basis, or every FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee) meeting, and you might come to a judgment that some interval more often than semi-annual might be worthwhile," he said.

He stressed that if that were the case, it should be done in the context of explaining the central bank's message.

The Fed is currently reviewing how it communicates with the public, including whether this task would be aided by adopting an explicit numerical inflation target, something that Poole has long ardently advocated.